

The Beholder in D&D vs the WoW one is different in that a Beholder has eyes at the end of each tentacle.. while the WoW version just has the one eye and multiple tentacles.. even the older WoW version had one big eye and several mini eyes around the body.
The closest we have to what D&D kobolds look like are the Draknoid Hatchlings.. like that one battle pet you'd get if you pre-ordered Dragonflight. Which already have the Goblin's model skeleton.. so they'd have to make a variant that is more reptilian and less dragon looking.
Spoiler:

That’s actually a very good point. Being that it is tech based and brand new, it could easily fill any role they wanted it too. Hell, they could even make it involve music if they wanted to appease the bard people. (I hope they don’t…) That class could easily fill melee or ranged dps, tanking, healing, or support dps depending on how it was designed. And if they DO indeed go underground, and involve more Goblins and Dwarves and (hopefully(personally)) Gnomes, it’s a really really solid possibility the class gets added with it after years and years of fans talking about it.
Also very possible they never add that class because of the controversy ha.

As I understand it WotC (or Hasbro I guess? WotC in the past at least) was pretty litigious with anything close to it but fair enough. And I admit my own ignorance in things as I just kinda figured kobolds in general were draconic to some degree but a wiki dive has since told me I'm very much wrong and kobolds are honestly pretty varied with versions of them being just kinda gremlins, small human-like sprites, their names were apparently the root for goblins even, and even some canine-like ones (those seem to be the version Japan prefers which are derived from Record of Lodoss War which themselves are derived from earlier D&D versions).
So yeah, seems I'm mistaken.
...still want my draconic goblins though.
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.
They cannot sue over kobolds because kobolds were part of the Open Gaming License and its successor texts and were never copyrights. After all most D&D monsters have to some extent a basis in real world myths so Hasbro or previous owners would never have been allowed to establish a copyright on them. And as said, even if they could they waived that right when they included them in the SRD or other similar texts. Beholders and Mind Flayers are a different case (were never under an open license) and Blizzard has to an extent used both which suggests that Hasbro is not interested.
I know the thread drifted a bit from the speculation stuff, but now that we're nearly 30 days away from the announcement if I had to bet into something, I would go with this:
Sadly, no Revamp again, my fellow world revampers. Maybe next time?!
Only another two years or so will tell...
I only hope 11.0 will not have a Master Voidlord, who was behind everything void-related stuff that happened since "only God knows when", if you know what I mean.
Pretty much, I recall the newcomers being part of the reason for easier, streamlined content (i.e. Cata Heroic nerfs). It can be interpreted many ways so I wouldn't place much weight into it. Legion was one of the better expansions and it likely never reached WoW's peak numbers. Likewise, other games have never reached these metrics, doesn't mean they're terrible.

I wouldn't take it TOO seriously.
It's Gnome/Goblins used as comedic relief as a reference to this ad for the NE/Undead heritage armour.
Because they are short. (But some people might argue that Gnome/Goblins are not used for comedic relief!)

Put an orc on it is insteresting wording isnt it. Kinda confirms an orc heavy or at least thrall heavy exapsnio imo.
World revamp, and Lightforged Draenor invasion? Could explain the data mined new manafield from Ethereals.
Would also be a fun time to add Ethereals as a neutral race.

The Ilgynoth whispers are Blizzards best creation because they create so much discussion by just being some vague sounding BS that could apply to a Million different things.
Every single quote has been solved in every single expansion, somehow. Five lanterns turned from Pillars of Creation Covenants to Oathstones. Vassal of Life turned from Bolvar to Ysera to Malfurion to now Alexstrasza. The Blind Queen turned from Sylvanas, to Azeroth, to Tyrande, to Azshara, to any female character.
Then we get whispers like "The lord of ravens will turn the key" or "The boy-king serves at the master's table. Three lies will he offer you" which I don't think will ever become relevant, or haven't been relevant.
They should give whoever wrote those a raise because they certainly got their money worth.
Last edited by Makorus; 2023-09-28 at 09:39 AM.

Got nothing against the guy, but do any of you actually think that most of these Statements he's making hold any substance towards anything that's going to happen? Why should he, on his own, be allowed to throw out not hints, but actual insinuations to direction so abundantly. It's just weird. He's not gonna be Blizzards golden child of Streamers that gets extra privileges above all others and he's probably also not in the Loop on anything without signing something that'd partially prevent these kinds of Tweets (his Tweets on the Bcon Topic/Xpac/Classic+ in general).
My money is simply on his usual shenanigans where he's just fishing for MMOC Reactions. Bait people en masse, then open the site on Stream sometime, laugh at his haters, laugh at the ones that believe it and fuck off till next Season.
