Not going to touch on the rest because i disagree with most of it, and would happily discuss it but pretty sure its off topic, so for another time.
What i absolutely, 100% agree with is this really strange mentality many (not all) staunch defenders of DF say - "its not THAT bad, its better than SL". I have seen it over and over again, thread after thread - the same response - "its not THAT bad". I have asked this before and been heckled endlessly, but when did our expectations of any game, let alone a blizzard game, LET ALONE WOW, go from "the best mmo available period" to "its not THAT bad".
For those enjoying DF, power to you, im genuinely happy you like the game and dont have a bad word to say about anyone having a good time playing a video game - i have played Ghost Recon: Wildlands start to finish 6 times now - 6 full playthroughs of a game that launched to TERRIBLE fan reception. Granted, it improved greatly over the years, im just pointing out i like things others hate, and dont hate on those who like things i dont.
I just cant get my head around the bar being SO LOW for a company like Acti-Blizz. The same confusion occurs with Bioware, who could release a game where you create a generic character, name it, and 2 seconds after you hit PLAY it says "GAME OVER" and fans would still claim its genius and an amazing product. CDPR are another example.
One thing i will say, and totally off topic, is for whatever reason, VALVE are the opposite - if its not the best game of the decade the fanbase fucking crucify Gabe, and that takes some solid timber.