Hunters should be able to have a quiver equiped along side a cape

[Gimlix]

As simple as it goes, why are we limited to either use a quiver and remove our cape our vice versa? Since we use bows we should also have a quiver as immersive as it can be. If we want a cape and quiver then we are limited with only the legion artifact weapons.

Should hunters be able to get another equipment slot just for quivers? Like shoulders got 2 seperate slots when you wanna have 2 different shoulder pieces?

[Mysterymask]

Game limitations
probably the best way would of been make the quiver a belt that shows up instead but i feel that might break the spaghetti code

[Lochton]

Naw, not really needed. Could be cool but not needed.

Instead, the ammo quiver and pouch shouldn't be class locked to Hunter only..

[loras]

Naw, not really needed. Could be cool but not needed.

Instead, the ammo quiver and pouch shouldn't be class locked to Hunter only..

This, could see me using the ammo pouch as a stand-in bomb pouch for my engineer.

[3DTyrant]

As cool as it would be, for me personally the potential clipping issues would bug me too much to use both. Once I see it it's just a big no for me.

[Lolites]

well first of all the quiver shouldnt be on back, its impractical as hell, should be on belt

[Schizoide]

Quivers on the back are a very common fantasy look, like chainmail bikinis. Impractical but iconic, really.

Anyway of course you should be able to have both a cape and a quiver, but cloak clipping is already really bad on a lot of player models so I just don't see how it would work in this engine.

[melzas]

well first of all the quiver shouldnt be on back, its impractical as hell, should be on belt

You know what else is impractical?

- 3 meters long swords
- shoulderpads 3 times size of characters head
- plate skirts
- slut mogs
- wearing coffin or a treasure chest on your back
... and so on.

The last thing that should be of anyone's concern regarding transmogs in this fantasy, whimsical setting is realism... Quivers on the back are cool.

[meheez]

ofc just like the legion artifact bow allows us

[Lolites]

You know what else is impractical?

- 3 meters long swords
- shoulderpads 3 times size of characters head
- plate skirts
- slut mogs
- wearing coffin or a treasure chest on your back
... and so on.

and when that will be ANYWHERE near the topic we might discuss that
topic is quiver vs cape, or why not both - which with quiver at belt would be solved...

The last thing that should be of anyone's concern regarding transmogs in this fantasy, whimsical setting is realism...

i never said its bcs it unrealistic... its impractical, and with cape would be even more so, you know roleplaying, which transmog kinda belongs to, is a thing...

Quivers on the back are cool.

thats your opinion, in my opinion its stupid, impractical, and it looks terrible, but sadly unlike with all your examples, theres no option...

[Nymrohd]

and when that will be ANYWHERE near the topic we might discuss that
topic is quiver vs cape, or why not both - which with quiver at belt would be solved...

I mean . . . then you would not have a belt

[Deneios]

In vanilla you would see the quiver and it had 3 models. It was only visible to the hunter tho.

[Lochton]

well first of all the quiver shouldnt be on back, its impractical as hell, should be on belt

But... Quivers can be both? It is about your function, then you choose its placement? Quiver mounted at the belt/hilt can be really dreadful for mobility.

- - - Updated - - -

In vanilla you would see the quiver and it had 3 models. It was only visible to the hunter tho.

I used to bug it out on purpose to have weapon + quiver appear. Looked so great!

[Lorgar Aurelian]

Game limitations
probably the best way would of been make the quiver a belt that shows up instead but i feel that might break the spaghetti code

In classic we had capes and quivers no it’s not a game limitation they would just need to bring that back.

[Gimlix]

Naw, not really needed. Could be cool but not needed.

Instead, the ammo quiver and pouch shouldn't be class locked to Hunter only..

Why not? What class should also have a quiver on their back though?

- - - Updated - - -

As cool as it would be, for me personally the potential clipping issues would bug me too much to use both. Once I see it it's just a big no for me.

Clipping should be normal and understandable, since you can't forcome that because we got so many races, just because it clips a bit we shouldn't have it.
I never understood how people get bothered too much by clipping, most of the time it's very minimum.

https://imgur.com/a/Hvpi40C (it's not too bad)

[Lochton]

Why not? What class should also have a quiver on their back though?

Hunters ain't the only ones with a use for an ammo pouch or quiver? I mean, Warriors and Rogues should be able to apply it too?

[Gimlix]

Hunters ain't the only ones with a use for an ammo pouch or quiver? I mean, Warriors and Rogues should be able to apply it too?

Since when does a warrior use a bow? I do get the point of throwing knives and having a little pouch that can have these kinda knives.
Reminds me of the 2004 version warrior where you had an extra slot for... what was it called? for bows and any other side weapon...

[Lochton]

Since when does a warrior use a bow? I do get the point of throwing knives and having a little pouch that can have these kinda knives.
Reminds me of the 2004 version warrior where you had an extra slot for... what was it called? for bows and any other side weapon...

You don't get the point of transmogging, I guess? I mean, Warriors and Rogues have used ranged weapons for a long time before it was removed, and there are a lot of people who wish to apply such look to their character, either because they miss it, or as a build of a roleplay character - and these two classes can still equip said ranged weapons.

[Gimlix]

You don't get the point of transmogging, I guess? I mean, Warriors and Rogues have used ranged weapons for a long time before it was removed, and there are a lot of people who wish to apply such look to their character, either because they miss it, or as a build of a roleplay character - and these two classes can still equip said ranged weapons.

But having an quiver on the back while using only a melee weapons sure does look odd, no matter how much ur into roleplay. Then give them an option to be able to shoot with a bow again. Anyways, i don't mind getting another "Quiver" slot for any class to use for their specific goal end, if it's quiver, knifepouch, ammopouch, extra backpack etc.

Clipping shouldn't hold such an epic thing back.

[Lochton]

But having an quiver on the back while using only a melee weapons sure does look odd, no matter how much ur into roleplay. Then give them an option to be able to shoot with a bow again. Anyways, i don't mind getting another "Quiver" slot for any class to use for their specific goal end, if it's quiver, knifepouch, ammopouch, extra backpack etc.

Clipping shouldn't hold such an epic thing back.

So, you are saying one cannot take on a role in a roleplaying game, and look the part? As well, can one not fight melee with a quiver or even so, an ammo pouch?

What you are saying is basically, "Oh, because you can't shoot a bow/gun, you can't have it" - then, what about the added fantasy of the damn fact that as a Rogue, I can shoot a gun?