Not even a little bit true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genetic_hybrids
There's a huge amount of genetic divergence between the two. So much, the reason scientists were using paddlefish sperm in their experiments with Russian sturgeon as a control, under the assumption there was no
possible way they could fertilize the sturgeon eggs.
And they did.
In the same sense that human beings are "genetically modified" rodent-like animals, "bred" by natural selection for millions of years for successful traits. We're just quibbling about length of time and whether the selection pressures were natural or artificial.
They're not the same species any more. One population diverging from another into new species does not mean interbreeding is impossible. "Species" does not have a firm objective meaning in biology, because basically every "rule" we've come up with in trying to do so is violated by some set of species or another. Particularly as a single species is not static over its existence. It diversifies through mutation until the population is trimmed down through selection. The modern Coelacanth
superficially resembles its ancient origins, but it's not the same critter and
has changed in that timespan, and "Coelacanth" (Actinistia, properly) isn't a species in the first place; it's a class, several rungs higher up the taxonomic ladder. There's a ton of diversity in that lineage, even if only two species are known to have survived to exist today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth