
I wasn't actually aware of that, which shows how much I've honestly kept up with Marvel outside of the movies and the old X-Men 97' cartoons. Either way, my point was more so that when people think Professor X, they think the man in the wheelchair/hoverchair for the most part.
I am a bit surprised though to hear that Marvel moved away from him being wheelchair bound, since that was a fairly iconic part of his character and his backstory, and it added inclusivity and acceptance to the comics, which was of the core foundations of X-Men at it's inception and early run.
But again, my knowledge of marvel comicwise really doesn't go beyond the 90s era comics so for all I know that's also changed as well.
Last edited by Bladesyphon; 2026-02-12 at 04:22 PM.
Yeah, or, y'know, maybe they simply wanted him to be visibly injured and out of commission after a nearly fatal disintegration, and a wheelchair was an easy solution to convey that to players.
Despite what maladjusted, chronically online rightoids say, not every decision made by game designers is part of some woke DEI conspiracy.
Last edited by Kathranis; 2026-02-12 at 05:06 PM.
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.
Yeah. To me it's really simple writing motivations. They wanted to bench him, and used that as an opportunity to do a fake out to give Xal'atath's destruction of Dalaran more gravitas. Revealed he survived but is debilitated and now they can keep him around as a side character.
You know what I found amusing to myself. The name. Arcantina. I said this name in a southern Drawl to myself. Kinda sounds like how an old western Cowboy might say "Howdy pardner! Welcome ta Ar-cantina (OUR-Cantina)"![]()