Any class that is /afk.
Any class that is /afk.
I do believe sir, that you have just won the internet(s?).Originally Posted by Abandon
Originally Posted by Zenarius
qftOriginally Posted by Chillstream
GM/Raid Leader of <Air>, Sargeras-US, Alliance
13/13M Mythic Morning/Day-Time Raiding Guild
Now recruiting for Legion! Apply at air-guild.com
Resto shamans sometimes really hate Disc priests. Dispel water shield every time it's applied and mana burn them to zero. /victory
water shield uses no mana to cast so that doesnt cause much concern..
Plus, doesn't having it get dispelled use up a charge, thus giving them mana? (Unsure, but it's my guess)Originally Posted by Chillstream
~Former Priest/Guild Wars 2 Moderator~
Now TESTING: ArcheAge (Alpha)
Now PLAYING: MonoRed Burn (MtG Standard)
Twitter: @KelestiMMO come say hi!
~When you speak, I hear silence. Every word a defiance~
Water Shield was and possibly still is bugged, where casting it actually gives mana. Dispelling it should not make the mana proc from it though, because it removes all of the stacks immediately and Water Shield has no dispel protection like Lifebloom does.
I shall die here. Every inch of me shall perish. Every inch, but one. An inch. It is small and it is fragile and it is the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose it or give it away. We must never let them take it from us.
Uhm. NoOriginally Posted by Abandon
They won't get rage for hitting on a target that's shielded.
They will however, gain rage, when absorbing damage.
Really? I thought GC made a post saying that he knew it would be a slight nerf to Priests in PVP.
I shall die here. Every inch of me shall perish. Every inch, but one. An inch. It is small and it is fragile and it is the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose it or give it away. We must never let them take it from us.
My god, this quote is sigworthy.Originally Posted by drf691
Shamans and Boomkins are really easy to beat.
I recall a blue post saying "that's a buff to warriors agains priests" where they say that attacks that generate absorb will generate the rage. Can't find it tho and cba to look trough all the blues now.
Shadow Priests have owned Warlocks forever now.
The change was for Warriors getting hit and not generating rage while they have an absorption shield on them. This would benefit tanking warriors now that they can generate rage when the absorption takes the dmg. The other dude had no idea what he was talking about Rymezz.Originally Posted by Rymezz
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/26/1521...solutions.html
Guess Blizzard decided they wanted to buff warriors in PvP after all, and nerf the rage-starve tactic for priests.
But but but we still have armor when we deal with them!Originally Posted by Nezoia
Code:/endsarcasm
~Former Priest/Guild Wars 2 Moderator~
Now TESTING: ArcheAge (Alpha)
Now PLAYING: MonoRed Burn (MtG Standard)
Twitter: @KelestiMMO come say hi!
~When you speak, I hear silence. Every word a defiance~
Did they change Sunder Armor to a % yet or is it happening in 3.1
I shall die here. Every inch of me shall perish. Every inch, but one. An inch. It is small and it is fragile and it is the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose it or give it away. We must never let them take it from us.
It would be logical if Warriors gained Rage when hitting shielded targets. I mean, it IS pretty frustrating...
Dunno why, but I don't think I've lost to a Hunter 1v1 since I specced Disc sometime early in S3. (And even as Shadow they were generally easy).
Originally Posted by Ghostcrawler