even though he made it clear what he meant with "powerfull mc and all that" and "ill proofread what I wrote" thats just svada. If he proofread what he writes then he atleast must see how retarded most of his things are, like "A great number, if not a majority, of Shadow priests have Dispersion so it's hard to argue it isn't attractive" wtf? I say again what the f***? Number 51 talent should not be just badly attractive that just "most" specc it, gg.
Well who am I to complain, just look on rogues for pvp, dont specc number 51 talent, not becuase its not good ,becuase they are good number 51 talent, but they got 3 dps speccs to choose from and many, many abilities from different speccs they want. What do we got? ONE F'ING DPS SPECC, with a number 51 talent many even dont know if its worth speccing? Thats retarded, when you have 1 dps specc it should need something to make up for having just 1 dps specc, not "ehm most specc it, that makes it attractive, I think?"
And forgot to mention; whats up with the 4 set PVP bonus for sp? The same as a Disc Priest gear, 2 sec less cd on shield (or to be more exact, 2 sec less of the debuff caused by shield), but only one itsy bitsy problem there. Our shield SUCK compared to a discs shield (like disc shield; more dmg absorb, lots of buffs (25% haste, 3% less dmg and so on), damage given on hit etc) but whats with shadow priest shield? 4-5k shield? I dont say 4-5k shield is bad thing, but come on! its not that its cheap as a disc shield (almost 900 mana for us) and you nearly ever get to put it up every 13 sec on yourself if your hit on (something called global cooldown that is always for us on all abilites almost is in the way)
Atleast why couldnt the set bonus have been something USEFULL for us? Look at druids, 20% speed in all forms, or rogue; 10 more energy which improves their burst. We could have got some, maybe some mana back gained of our dmg, or maybe when movement impared; heres mana (like dk gets runic power) or something atleast useful