As a Demo lock my pet provides huge buffs to the party. He/She does at least 25% of my dps. AOE's better than most classes, provides additional CC at a pinch, provides a 10% spellpower buff, and provides me at least 25% damage reduction. He takes 90% less damage from AOE's, and although I have not done the math, I suspect with the passive heals I provide him through Fel Synergy and the Mana regen he provides me with Mana Feed resulting in less life taps, actually results in less healing required of the healer.
Yet despite all these very good reasons to keep my pet alive, I continually run into healers that say "lolz I don't heal pets". To my way of thinking this is pure ignorance of class mechanics. It doesn't take much logic to understand the benefits of keeping my pet alive far outweigh the negatives. Yes I can resummon him quickly when he dies in a fight... once. Outside of that I can only do it with a Soulburn, which is almost always on cooldown because I use it correctly.
I don't play a hunter so cannot speak with any authority with regard to BM pets, but I suspect a similar situation applies to them as the BM and Demo trees share a similar design.
I understand that in times gone by there were problems with pets being very squishy, and waste of time to try and keep up but my pets all have very nearly 100k health and decent defensive stats. I am also not suggesting my pet should be healed as a priority over another player, but the fact of the matter is with the damage reduction/passive heals and the dps increase resulting in a shorter fight it is an absurd argument for any healer to make that keeping a pet alive is a waste of mana. It is a saving.
So I guess the question I am asking is, are the healers I am meeting ignorant, churlish, or is my reasoning ability being overidden by my bias toward my class? Thoughts please.