Thread: 2v2 titles etc

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    No. They'll never be balanced and there's not nearly enough teams for a competitive Gladiator run.

  2. #22
    Herald of the Titans DiscoGhost's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Behind the Pillar
    Posts
    2,733
    Quote Originally Posted by direarms View Post
    lol WoW pvp. None of it is balanced.
    something tells me your a DOTA kinda person
    You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoGhost View Post
    it already hurts.
    Blizz has decided to balance all of pvp around gladiator 3v3. Problem is the other 95% of pvp situations are totaly retardedly crap. Let's see:
    2v2
    5v5
    Battle grounds, rated and non
    Lower level bg's (I'm leveling a feral and I get one shotted by rogues my same level. And equiv gear)
    Duels
    World pvp

    All broken,but hey, pvp is in a great place :/

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Emothianes View Post
    Yes, lets give shadow priests, rogues, and warriors even easier ways to get gladiator.
    you forgot mages, into WOTLK relentless season there was soo much QQ concerning mage/priest combos, rather than rolling nerfs against their pet classes, they announced they would no longer balance 2's. team ratings were removed from 2's also.

    top classes i see on my servers with "arena master" are #1 mages, #2 priests, #3 res druids/shammies

  5. #25
    The reason why they don't give titles for arena anymore is because every Warrior/healer and DK/healer team right now would be getting glad.

  6. #26
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoGhost View Post
    anything involving a hunter or a warrior these days is faceroll
    lolwut, can't handle hunters dmg? its like..over 9000 or is it..

  7. #27
    I wish they would bring titles back to 2v2. Its most popular bracket and every class has chance to get high rating. 5v5 is easily the worst bracket imo.

  8. #28
    The Patient murdockpt's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    340
    i just want skirmishes back nobody wants to do 2s, and 3s are becoming a hassle to coordinate

    sometimes i just want to test things without having to gather 4 peeps off my already crappy and low pop server

  9. #29
    Yah there should be 2v2 is damn fun
    \

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Wollveren View Post
    Yah there should be 2v2 is damn fun
    If you like 45 minute games that end up in a draw FUNFUNFUNFUN almost like friday.

  11. #31
    The Patient murdockpt's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    340
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobzor View Post
    If you like 45 minute games that end up in a draw FUNFUNFUNFUN almost like friday.
    hard switching is hard.

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by murdockpt View Post
    i just want skirmishes back nobody wants to do 2s, and 3s are becoming a hassle to coordinate

    sometimes i just want to test things without having to gather 4 peeps off my already crappy and low pop server
    I agree, I loved skirmishes. It was the best way to fine tune your arena play. You didn't have to find another willing participant yourself and you didn't have to worry about a rating. I personally love 2's the most, but it is way too imbalanced now.

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by murdockpt View Post
    hard switching is hard.
    A hard switch in 2's? lol

    OMG THEY SWITCHED TO YOU. oh jk you have hots rolling on you now

  14. #34
    Deleted
    They should get 'wannabe Glad' titles. or 'wannable rival'

  15. #35
    2v2 is good fun.
    Gladiator Underbyte

  16. #36
    Warchief SoulPoetry's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    2,060
    Quote Originally Posted by murdockpt View Post
    hard switching is hard.
    you are a warrior, you col. smash and people shit their pants. nuff said.

  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by matherl View Post
    2v2 is all FoTM
    I could say the same about 3v3, which is regarded as the most balanced comp. Which it is. But it's still very imbalanced as far as comps go. You have a few comps and classes destroying everything else. The occasional odd ball. And 5v5 is still zergfests where comp doesn't mean much so no comment.

  18. #38
    Herald of the Titans DiscoGhost's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Behind the Pillar
    Posts
    2,733
    Quote Originally Posted by murdockpt View Post
    hard switching is hard.
    says the warrior running KFC in 3s.........

    this is the part where i say "Cool story, bro!"
    Last edited by DiscoGhost; 2011-04-14 at 09:32 PM.
    You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.

  19. #39
    The Lightbringer Ultima's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,399
    Well, no. This is meant to be the part where we let the thread die as the question was answered very, very early on.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •