View Poll Results: Dwarf

Voters
241. You may not vote on this poll
  • Thorin Oakenshield

    82 34.02%
  • Balin

    39 16.18%
  • Bifur

    4 1.66%
  • Bofur

    11 4.56%
  • Bombur

    22 9.13%
  • Dori

    2 0.83%
  • Dwalin

    27 11.20%
  • Fili

    12 4.98%
  • Kili

    30 12.45%
  • Gloin

    8 3.32%
  • Nori

    1 0.41%
  • Oin

    1 0.41%
  • Ori

    2 0.83%
  1. #1421
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    - talking trolls and goblin king ruins the mystery aspect of middle earth. (can u imagine balrog talking to gandalf? that would've ruined the entire scene)
    While the trolls and goblins are supposed to be a peril and you should be a little concerned with the situations, they are nowhere near the level of the Balrog. A Balrog is an ancient evil that most people don't even know anything about. If Jackson had made the trolls and the Goblins more on the level of the Balrog, THAT would have been a huge issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontenac View Post
    One of the change I didn't like was Mirkwood. It was supposed to be already corrupted and called Mirkwood when the wizards arrived in Middle Earth about 2000 years before the story. It is even implied in the Silmarillion that the darkening of Greenwood-the-Great was what prompted the Valar to send the Istari in the first place.

    Same with the Ringwraiths. In the movie, it is said that the Witch King died in Angmar and was buried deep in a tomb locked by a spell. The White Council is surprised to learn he lives again and recognizes the blade Gandalf brought as a Blade of Morgul. It is implied the Necromancer brought him back from death. It goes against what we know of the Rings and their effects. The bearers of the Nine never died, but were turned into the Ringwraiths. The Witch King was already a Nazgûl when he was ruling over Angmar. He was then beaten by an army of Men and Elves and fled to Mordor, where he laid siege to Minas Ithil, which became known as Minas Morgul. If, in the movie, the Witch King was buried all this time, when did he take Minas Ithil where he could forge blades of Morgul?
    Both those points bothered me some as well. I am sort of curious about how they are going to handle everything with the Necromancer and the Witch King (since they seemed to indicate he is around already even though he isn't in corporeal form yet).

  2. #1422
    Herald of the Titans Frontenac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Québec, Québec
    Posts
    2,877
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    watch the fellowship of the ring again and tell me the goblin king felt completely silly
    Without a strong leader the likes of Sauron, Saruman or Nazgûl, the Orcs or Goblins are nothing more than roving bands of thieves and plunderers. They have no strong structures, no discipline and tend to fight among themselves. They are not as fearsome as the orcs we see in LotR and can more easily be dispatched. The Great Goblin is more like some sort of mobster than a warchief. He is just as chaotic as any orc, and yes, a little silly and erratic with a dark sense of humour.

    _________________________________________________


    As for Azog, I will wait the other movies before I form a firm opinion on its introduction in the story. As for now, he seems to me like a useless addition to the story. But like I said, we'll see...
    "Je vous répondrai par la bouche de mes canons!"

  3. #1423
    I can't help but find it fascinating seeing people reacting to the Hobbit after they've seen the LotR series, with the mind set that it shouldn't have anything to do with Middle Earth, or that it's not dark enough/out of place etc.

  4. #1424
    Quote Originally Posted by Shinzai View Post
    I can't help but find it fascinating seeing people reacting to the Hobbit after they've seen the LotR series, with the mind set that it shouldn't have anything to do with Middle Earth, or that it's not dark enough/out of place etc.
    Well, my argument that I used against Return of the King (too much unlike the book) at least isn't applicable to The Hobbit. It was pretty damn close to the book, the only problem is that it's my opinion that this particular book would make a much more difficult movie to watch than other Book -> Movie scenarios.

  5. #1425
    To infinity and beyond det's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The forums
    Posts
    28,627
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    you honestly werent let down by the movie?

    i mean i still enjoyed it. but it didn't come anywhere close to lotro. it has nothing to do with the childrens vs dark aspect. its how the film was made.
    I enjoyed the Hobbit. Still love the LotR movies more. But it is kinda unfair. They are more mature, more epic (because the books are) and should have been produced after the Hobbit. Will however shell out amazing amounts of money for the ultimate Hobbit / LotR six pack on bluray, recut, reassembed with oodles of extras. In 2015.

  6. #1426
    Banned Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,360
    but to be honest the similarrion has the potential to be better than the hobbit and lotro combined.

    morgoth anyone?

  7. #1427
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    but to be honest the similarrion has the potential to be better than the hobbit and lotro combined.

    morgoth anyone?
    but its written like a history book it would be boring.
    Gamdwelf the Mage

    Quote Originally Posted by Theodarzna View Post
    I'm calling it, Republicans will hold congress in 2018 and Trump will win again in 2020.

  8. #1428
    Banned Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamdwelf View Post
    but its written like a history book it would be boring.
    the history and flash back bits were some of the best parts in lotro and the hobbit...just sayin...

    ---------- Post added 2013-01-10 at 05:27 AM ----------

    i wonder how peter jackson would implement this in the movie



    btw thats morgoth

  9. #1429
    Pandaren Monk Xiphan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    but to be honest the similarrion has the potential to be better than the hobbit and lotro combined.

    morgoth anyone?
    It's really, really unlikely, but it would be great to see some of the individual story arcs fleshed out and adapted for film. Seeing Morgoth in action against Fingolfin would be fantastic.
    I'd like to see The Children Of Hurin on screen, but the romance is probably a little too unorthodox for the family audience it would likely be targeting.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    btw thats morgoth
    Isn't that Ungoliant?

  10. #1430
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    but to be honest the similarrion has the potential to be better than the hobbit and lotro combined.

    morgoth anyone?

    That book is just crap. And no, The Hobbit wasn't a letdown.

  11. #1431
    Herald of the Titans Frontenac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Québec, Québec
    Posts
    2,877
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    but to be honest the similarrion has the potential to be better than the hobbit and lotro combined.

    morgoth anyone?
    The Silmarillion is way too long and has too much characters to make a movie out of it. They could take one story from the book like Beren and Luthien or The Children of Hurin. In fact, a movie of The Children of Hurin could be more captivating than that dry book Christopher Tolkien wrote. I was so disappointed. It was like reading a chapter from The Silmarillion, only longer, as verbose and with barely more dialogues. I mean, they could have done so much more with that story if they gave it to a decent writer.

    Anyway, don't expect a movie from the Silmarillion soon. At any rate, Peter Jackson won't be doing it. The Tolkien Estate is not overthrilled by his work (although they should be happy with the money they make out of it). Such a project would mean years of negociations with the Tolkien Estate.

    ---------- Post added 2013-01-10 at 12:43 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post

    btw thats morgoth
    That little man in the bottom right may be Morgoth. This is Ungoliant.

    This is Morgoth.

    Last edited by Frontenac; 2013-01-10 at 05:43 AM.
    "Je vous répondrai par la bouche de mes canons!"

  12. #1432
    Scarab Lord xylophone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    4,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Howdyho View Post
    That book is just crap. And no, The Hobbit wasn't a letdown.
    I'm guessing you didn't get through the beginning of it. either that or shit taste

    Please don't abuse spoiler tags and insult people.
    Last edited by Arlee; 2013-01-10 at 05:33 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Lets say you have a two 3 inch lines. One is all red and the other is 48% red and 52% blue. Does that mean there's a 50-50 chance they're both red or is the second line matching the all red line by 48%?
    ^^^ Wells using an analogy

  13. #1433
    Herald of the Titans BHD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    WMTown
    Posts
    2,743
    Quote Originally Posted by xylophone View Post
    I'm guessing you didn't get through the beginning of it. either that or shit taste
    While I don't like to call other people's opinions/taste wrong, the fact that there could be anyone enjoying Tolkien's work enough to read Silmarillion fully and NOT liking it would blow my mind. So I kinda agree with you. I knew it would be one of my favorite books even before reading half of it. But I won't re-read it for years due to how it's written.
    Cave Cave Deus Videt

  14. #1434
    Banned Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,360
    im actually kind of surprised by the blind approval of the hobbit movie from the tolkien fans.

  15. #1435
    Herald of the Titans BHD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    WMTown
    Posts
    2,743
    ..Huh? I loved the movie and you didn't, just because I, and others here who loved it, happen to be Tolkien fans doesn't mean that it's blind approval. I love Batman but I thought the Dark Knight Rises was pretty shit.

    Also, there's a couple of posters in here that shared their opinions about things they didn't like and they do seem to be Tolkien fans, seeing how they know a lot of the lore outside of the movies and hobbit/lotr books.
    Cave Cave Deus Videt

  16. #1436
    Banned Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Xiphan View Post


    Isn't that Ungoliant?
    spider is. morgoth is the little man

  17. #1437
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    im actually kind of surprised by the blind approval of the hobbit movie from the tolkien fans.
    Blind approval? If I wanted to I could critique the movie down to every last fault. If you start nitpicking then hell, you can claim there's tons of faults in movies like Schindler's List, Twelve Angry Men, Pulp Fiction, Citizen Kane (Widely considered some of the best movies) etc.

    The main thing you need to ask yourself when you leave the cinema is, "Did I enjoy that movie?" If your answer is yes, then it's not 'Blind Approval', it's called enjoying the damn movie. You stated on the last page that you did, 'enjoy the movie', so what's with the snarky comment almost implying that we're weird for being Tolkien fans but still loving the heck out of the movie? You clearly like Tolkein based off your comments and Similarion stuff, and you enjoyed the movie, so I don't see what the problem is. State what you thought was strange about it (Like you did with your Goblin King comment etc from the last couple pages) and see what other people's opinions are, but don't try and say that people liking those aspects is, 'Blind Approval'.

    In regards to Azog, I think Peter had two choices, either add that 'Main Antagonist' in to give the movie a more tense story Arc making the film stand better as it's own journey. Or spend all that time that was spent explaining Azog and any scene that involved him or his band of Orcs, basically instead just having talking shots between the Dwarves, learning about them, their history, more silly humour etc. Now I personally wouldn't mind it either way, when it comes to the Writing team behind these Middle Earth films, I'm happy to spend an hour of just character background setup, since it's always still done extremely well in both script and direction. But as a person who understands basics of our society, majority of people need more then that, they need an antagonist to follow and they need at least some action to break up the "slow" sequences. Frankly it could have been completely terrible, but in the hands of Peter Jackson he was able to create this interesting plot Arc, build up a character who in the book was essentially nothing and turn a film which could have had no tension and mostly 2 hours of character setup, into a Thrilling and intense journey which satisfied both aspects.

    As I've stated before, I don't think The Hobbit is better then LOTR (And that's just slightly unfair considering it's 1 movie VS 3 >.> ), and I don't think it will beat out LOTR even after the entire trilogy is complete (Unless the next 2 movies are Higher then God Tier). Even comparing Fellowship of the Ring VS Unexpected Journey I still think Fellowship is better. But it was still an immensely enjoyable movie, worthy of being called a 'Tolkein based' movie and another year to wait is going to be an Expected Journey of patience. (For reference, IMO FOTR > TTT > UJ > ROTK and Bilbo (Martin Freeman) > Frodo)

  18. #1438
    Scarab Lord Vestig3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands, Amsterdam
    Posts
    4,171
    Quote Originally Posted by Daverid View Post
    Even comparing Fellowship of the Ring VS Unexpected Journey I still think Fellowship is better.
    But The unexpected journey was def better then The Two towers which i personaly disliked most of the LOTR trio but tbh even if this trio is better then TLOTR and im not saying it will be better you still cant compare both yes they are connected but by far are the same the hobbit isnt ask dark as TLOTR therefor people will dislike it more then TLOTR.
    - Vanilla was legitimately bad; we just didn't know any better at the time - SirCowDog


  19. #1439
    Fluffy Kitten Majad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    13,531
    I don't know if this has been posted or not, but I saw it on Imgur and I thought I'd put it here so everyone can see it.




    Amazing poster I say, love it a lot.
    MAL
    ----------------------
    Last.fm
    ----------------------
    Perfect Illusion

  20. #1440
    Can't wait to see the next LoTR, The Destruction of Smaug. I really enjoyed The Hobbit, and I haven't seen any LOTR before except the first one at release.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •