Last edited by Nebthet; 2011-09-13 at 10:25 AM.
Estás usando este software de traducción de forma incorrecta. Por favor, consulta el manual.
I keep hearing rumors that although IBT is great at testing heat, P95 seems to be a better job of finding stability. It's not risky to run it at a low voltage, it'll blue screen if there's not enough and then you'll have to up it. May just be a good chip, have to find out how far you can push it though before it hits it's 'ceiling'.
My experience is the opposite. Well not the total opposite because IBT does heat up my chip more than P95.
But when testing several overclocks earlier on sandy bridge, I really could be running P95 for days with no problem, while 35 runs of IBT with AVX linpacks (depending on setting but: less than 10 minutes) would reveal instability.
You've had the opposite experience that myself and a lot of others at OCN have had. For the vast bulk of people, Prime95 has found more instability (though sometimes 4-8 hours into stressing), while IBT w/ AVX only produced hotter temps. Personally, I was able to run 20 6GB+ tests in IBT and fail within 5 minutes of Priming.
Achieved a new stable OC at 4.8ghz after buying some new ram (Mushkin Blackline 1600mhz CL9 @ 1.5v).
Processor: i5 2500K
Clock: 4.8GHZ
Voltage: 1.392v @ load
Screenshot: http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n...cho/proof2.jpg
CPU-Z: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1998272
WoW Character: Wintel - Frostmourne (OCE)
Gaming rig: i7 7700K, GTX 1080 Ti, 16GB DDR4, BenQ 144hz 1440p
Signature art courtesy of Blitzkatze
As I understand it, IBT w/ AVX extension is a variant of what Intel uses. My understanding could be wrong, though.
And what is exactly why you don't like Prime95? Because it finds instability? I considered my i5 2500k overclock stable when it survived a 12 hour P95 run and 30 6+GB IBT w/ AVX passes. IBT (even with AVX) just doesn't stress a Sandy Bridge setup as well as Prime95. It does generate the maximum amount of processor heat, though.
Am I the only one with a 1055t? >.>
Processor: Phenom II 1055t
Clock: 4.13ghz
Voltage: 1.49v according to CPU-Z (1.53 in bios)
Cooler: Spire Thermax Eclipse II
Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/oXx3U.png
CPU-Z: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1384482
Processor: Intel Core i5 2500K
Clock: 4.7Ghz
Voltage: 1.39
Cooler: Hyper 212+
Screenshot LINK: http://i.imgur.com/4RrEs.jpg
Valid CPU-Z link: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2001713
Volt SS from HWMonitor: http://i.imgur.com/A8a94.jpg
Last edited by Slimjayrad; 2011-09-16 at 10:44 AM. Reason: Added additional as cpuz showing wrong
WoW Character: Wintel - Frostmourne (OCE)
Gaming rig: i7 7700K, GTX 1080 Ti, 16GB DDR4, BenQ 144hz 1440p
Signature art courtesy of Blitzkatze
ignore cpuz for volt, it's often wrong
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Gigabyte X670 Aorus Elite AX: G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 C30 : PowerColor Radeon RX 7900 GRE Hellhound OC: CORSAIR HX850i: Samsung 960 EVO 250GB NVMe: fiio e10k: lian-li pc-o11 dynamic XL:
@Icpie - I have that same CPU & MOBO. I can't get anywhere near 4ghz
Yeah, CPU voltage in CPU-Z is really weird. Mine shows around 1.04 to 1.06 volt... at 4.4GHz. So derp.
Additionally here's an odd issue... my computer is stable with auto-voltage, but set the voltage to what it says in BIOS that it's supposed to be? Not stable. Wtf.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Gigabyte X670 Aorus Elite AX: G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 C30 : PowerColor Radeon RX 7900 GRE Hellhound OC: CORSAIR HX850i: Samsung 960 EVO 250GB NVMe: fiio e10k: lian-li pc-o11 dynamic XL: