Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ...
7
15
16
17
  1. #321
    Bloodsail Admiral nobodysbaby's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,055
    It is only a 10% manacost reduction (so far) Zito.

  2. #322
    10% is still pretty big considering it costs over 9000. 900 mana off the top is pretty decent.



    EDIT: Totally didn't purposely try for the over 9000 meme.

  3. #323
    Quote Originally Posted by Afflictid View Post
    10% is still pretty big considering it costs over 9000. 900 mana off the top is pretty decent.



    EDIT: Totally didn't purposely try for the over 9000 meme.
    Sure you didn't Afflictid... we all know your motives.
    Pixl Returned! Holy Priest

  4. #324
    I dont like the 4pc for disc.
    To get the most out of the bigger shields you would have to use more mastery and cast more of them, which means casting them more often every 12s which would reduce the effectiveness of the second part. => Those two parts together are weaker than their sum - weaker than they appear at first glance. Which is always bad (in WoW) since others will cry for nerfs.

    ---------- Post added 2011-10-08 at 06:51 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by [-Spiritus-] View Post
    Theoretically, you could squeeze 8 shields w/ a cancel cast of DH within the window, which would save 12,601.08mana on 8shields(in IF). If 7, 11025.95. DH costs 7412.4 mana. If your goal is to cast x7/8shields, then cancel casting DH is less in net mana than not cancel casting DH. So, the only question would be, does DH resolve more damage than 7/8 PW:S, from a pure HPS standpoint.

    But, again, assuming Disc will even trigger the 2pc w/ DH in live version of the set.
    More than 5/6 PW:S, please. You can cast 2 shields in the 2s after DH finishes even if you channel it for 8s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •