Page 1 of 7
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1

    Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Any thoughts on whether or not Cataclysm will be Blizz's last real expansion to WoW? I half expect their new MMO to be announced at Blizzcon.

    When I say last *real* expansion, I am inferring that while there will likely be another one, it won't be as epic as the last ones. Rather it will be a bone thrown to feed the hungry. All energy thereafter will be put towards the newer MMO.

    Then again... knowing Blizzard, they are probably 4 years away from actually releasing a new MMO.

  2. #2

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    There will be at least one more. Sargeras has to die.
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment

    Artefacts:
    • In ordner to better fit the current post-truth zeitgeist, we are going to rename alle occurences of "artefact" into "artebelieve".

  3. #3

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    What about the Emerald dream?! We need to fix that up and free the green dragons and druids stuck in that Nightmare.

  4. #4

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mix
    What about the Emerald dream?! We need to fix that up and free the green dragons and druids stuck in that Nightmare.
    I thought Malfurion and Cenarius already dealt with the Nightmare hence both are in Cataclysm fighting Ragnaros.

  5. #5
    Deleted

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    I think i readed once from somewhere, that blizzard promised that there will be at least 6 WoW expansions. Im not sure about that thought.

  6. #6
    Deleted

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Anderone
    I thought Malfurion and Cenarius already dealt with the Nightmare hence both are in Cataclysm fighting Ragnaros.
    No, you've been misinformed.
    Blizz said LOOONG ago that the Emerald Dream will most probably have it's own expansion.
    So, yes, atleast 2 more coming our way.

  7. #7

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Don't forget that Sargeras and Azshara are still alive...
    And we have never meet the titans from Pantheon

  8. #8

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Good points guys, however Blizzard doesn't *have* to let us 'beat' the universe that this game exists in. That would be stupid, buisness-wise, for them to do. They want to milk this franchise forever. So until there is lore to suggest that Sargaras isn't the baddest of bad, I don't expect there will be any plans for him to be someone that can be killed.

    Rather, we are more likely to see the following happen from Blizzard.

    WoW - Catacylsm - 2010
    WoW - Last Expansion - 2012
    New MMO - 2014
    Warcraft 4 - 2015 <--- start off where Last Expansion left off
    Warcraft 4: Expansion - 2016
    WoW2 - 2020 <--- start off where Warcraft 4 left off

  9. #9

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by lordhakera
    No, you've been misinformed.
    Blizz said LOOONG ago that the Emerald Dream will most probably have it's own expansion.
    So, yes, atleast 2 more coming our way.
    They said it long ago that it was something they wanted to do, true. But then some months back the Stormrage book was released, effectively solving the problems within the Emerald Dream. I think that boat is gone. Perhaps it could be a part of an expansion, but not an expansion itself.

  10. #10

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mehdi
    Good points guys, however bare in mind that we don't *have* to do any more... Saragaras does not *need* to die, for example. World of Warcraft is a cash cow for Blizzard, so they aren't going to let you just "beat" the universe, so to speak.

    Rather, we are more likely to see the following happen from Blizzard.

    WoW - Catacylsm - 2010
    WoW - Last Expansion - 2012
    New MMO - 2014
    Warcraft 4 - 2015 <--- start off where Last Expansion left off
    Warcraft 4: Expansion - 2016
    WoW2 - 2020 <--- start off where Warcraft 4 left off
    Indeed
    My armory
    DK tanking stuffs since WoTLK beta's first day of release.

    Actually I have a real life, I'm just on my friends computer while we have a drink around his house before we go BMX'ing down the castle near by his house and found all the geeks spouting rubbish.
    Most fail troll thread ever. Featuring Boub as last post!

  11. #11

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mehdi
    Good points guys, however Blizzard doesn't *have* to let us 'beat' the universe that this game exists in. That would be stupid, buisness-wise, for them to do. They want to milk this franchise forever. So until there is lore to suggest that Sargaras isn't the baddest of bad, I don't expect there will be any plans for him to be someone that can be killed.

    Rather, we are more likely to see the following happen from Blizzard.

    WoW - Catacylsm - 2010
    WoW - Last Expansion - 2012
    New MMO - 2014
    Warcraft 4 - 2015 <--- start off where Last Expansion left off
    Warcraft 4: Expansion - 2016
    WoW2 - 2020 <--- start off where Warcraft 4 left off
    Screw that,,, I quit
    Paladins are Cool Now?
    What happen to Kalgan?

  12. #12

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mehdi
    Good points guys, however Blizzard doesn't *have* to let us 'beat' the universe that this game exists in. That would be stupid, buisness-wise, for them to do. They want to milk this franchise forever. So until there is lore to suggest that Sargaras isn't the baddest of bad, I don't expect there will be any plans for him to be someone that can be killed.

    Rather, we are more likely to see the following happen from Blizzard.

    WoW - Catacylsm - 2010
    WoW - Last Expansion - 2012
    New MMO - 2014
    Warcraft 4 - 2015 <--- start off where Last Expansion left off
    Warcraft 4: Expansion - 2016
    WoW2 - 2020 <--- start off where Warcraft 4 left off
    In this scenario would the 2012 be the expansion where everybody loses. IE. 90% of all life on Azeroth is destroyed (including the players) in patch 6.4 or something silly and then we all start at level 1 in WoW2 with new classes + the basic Warrior/Priest. I think it would really make for a good outcome and Warcraft 4 can work on new heroes that build upon this total extinction of some species being wiped out. Kind of like the Mammals after the Dinosaurs went extinct.

  13. #13

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Personally, I dont see the advantage of going to a "WoW2", when they can charge the same to keep the story lines going as expansions of the existing game. They have already setup the advancement of the game via specifically named expansions (i.e. Burning Crusade, WotLK, etc), so the "WoW2" moniker isnt really necessary. They can do everything that they want to expand the game, upgrade the game and keep the funds coming in via the existing path. Plus, with new IPs in the pipeline why fix what ain't broke, when you can just keep rolling out the content for the foreseeable future.

  14. #14

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    In before the list of awesomeness showing expansions and level numbers :
    Sometimes you just have to stop healing some people to prove a point, if they don't listen, it's really their own fault :P

  15. #15

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Merlandec
    Personally, I dont see the advantage of going to a "WoW2", when they can charge the same to keep the story lines going as expansions of the existing game. They have already setup the advancement of the game via specifically named expansions (i.e. Burning Crusade, WotLK, etc), so the "WoW2" moniker isnt really necessary. They can do everything that they want to expand the game, upgrade the game and keep the funds coming in via the existing path. Plus, with new IPs in the pipeline why fix what ain't broke, when you can just keep rolling out the content for the foreseeable future.
    Note, that my claim is that WoW2 would be released in the 2020 timeframe. That is 10 years from now. There is no way the game would be running on the same engine.

    However, if EVE is any retort, then perhaps WoW *can* follow the model you suggest.

    However, from a buisness perspective, I find that they are more likely to make money when shifting 70% of their userbase from WoW -> New MMO -> WoW2. In short, I believe that this would be done because (a) Supporting 2 MMOs is nuts and (b) You can reignite your customer base by releasing entirely new worlds every 10 years, rather then relying on only sustaining them.

    However, to amend my previous claim... WoW2 would probably release much after 2020 ( perhaps 2024 ). I imagine a 10 year cycle for an MMO is healthy.

  16. #16

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Their new MMO should take a really long while before it is released. Blizzard has Starcraft 2 being released shortly. Then, a new xpac for WoW. After that comes Diablo 3. Xpacs for Starcraft and Diablo 3. And guess what? WoW has achieved a very sustainable status. It loses a few players here, get new players there. Even if it had almost a 50% cut on the playerbase it would still be amazingly profitable.

    WoW dominates the market. WoW is dying since it was released, just like each and every one of us. We are still alive and kicking, and coming back for more WoW.

    One more expansion at the very least and even though I am a big fan of Druid lore, the Emerald Dream and the Green Dragonflight, I hope they do not make Emerald Dream have an entire xpac dedicated to it. If a huge amount of regular people has access to it, it would already be WAY beyond salvation. The world in the xpac could be immense, but the Emerald Dream is a verdant paradise and not a large scale battlefield. If it ever comes to that it would be doomed very quickly, especially with the leadership of imbeciles like Garrosh, Varian Wrynn and especially the Forsaken, which are not part of the nature. They are just magic gone wrong. Having their aid and presence there would make even the most open-minded green dragon flinch in disgust.

  17. #17
    Dreadlord Metian's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    764

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mehdi
    Good points guys, however Blizzard doesn't *have* to let us 'beat' the universe that this game exists in. That would be stupid, buisness-wise, for them to do. They want to milk this franchise forever. So until there is lore to suggest that Sargaras isn't the baddest of bad, I don't expect there will be any plans for him to be someone that can be killed.

    Rather, we are more likely to see the following happen from Blizzard.

    WoW - Catacylsm - 2010
    WoW - Last Expansion - 2012
    New MMO - 2014
    Warcraft 4 - 2015 <--- start off where Last Expansion left off
    Warcraft 4: Expansion - 2016
    WoW2 - 2020 <--- start off where Warcraft 4 left off
    WoW2 isn't going to happen. Why would they make a WoW2 when they can also update the current World of Warcraft with a different team.
    ALTF4.

  18. #18

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by MushroomBomb
    They said it long ago that it was something they wanted to do, true. But then some months back the Stormrage book was released, effectively solving the problems within the Emerald Dream. I think that boat is gone. Perhaps it could be a part of an expansion, but not an expansion itself.
    To people who want to go to the emerald dream and fight villains there, why would u mess up the blue prints of azeroth ... for loot?

    Nice, i want incoming!

  19. #19

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    I hope it'll be the last. It's getting old.

  20. #20
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,249

    Re: Cataclysm last *real* wow expansion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mehdi
    Note, that my claim is that WoW2 would be released in the 2020 timeframe. That is 10 years from now. There is no way the game would be running on the same engine.

    However, if EVE is any retort, then perhaps WoW *can* follow the model you suggest.

    However, from a buisness perspective, I find that they are more likely to make money when shifting 70% of their userbase from WoW -> New MMO -> WoW2. In short, I believe that this would be done because (a) Supporting 2 MMOs is nuts and (b) You can reignite your customer base by releasing entirely new worlds every 10 years, rather then relying on only sustaining them.

    However, to amend my previous claim... WoW2 would probably release much after 2020 ( perhaps 2024 ). I imagine a 10 year cycle for an MMO is healthy.
    Supporting 2 MMOs IS nuts. Also, people really, really do not like change. Look at the QQ every time a patch is released. It doesn't matter what the patch does, SOMEONE doesn't like it. If it gave everyone a pony, there would be threads here about how terrible it is that people didn't have to earn that pony, or some such.

    The thing is, WoW is already well past the point of normal decay, and it continues to grow. The expansion system is the best idea Blizzard could have had, because at this point, there is no concept that any mechanic is incapable of being changed, or that new mechanics cannot be added. The changes already made are massive. Instead of developing an entirely new and unrelated class/race/talent system in a brand new untested engine with a new world, Blizzard can just update their existing content, upgrade the engine (as they've already done a few times; the addition of shadows a few patches back for instance), and tweaking things to retain balance.

    This maintains the continuity enough to keep the change-fearers playing, while adding enough content to continue to attract new players.


    The other absolutely major issue is that WoW continues to hold the #1 slot for a reason; content. Each expansion is roughly the same size, content-wise, as most new MMOs. What this means is that WoW now has three times the content any competitor can reasonably expect to provide at launch, and this will be only increased with each new expansion.


    Any kind of "WoW 2.0" has two hurdles to overcome. It has to provide enough content to be an attractive competitor, which means it needs more content than most MMOs at launch manage to provide. And it needs to provide enough of an improvement to the engine and mechanics that it would not be possible to convert the existing WoW over to that system in a patch or three, while still retaining enough similarity that it can justify still being World of Warcraft. And this is assuming they remove another major hurdle by turning WoW 1.0 off, forcing people to quit or switch to 2.0; otherwise, many people will just stick with what they know.


    It's a huge risk for almost negligible advantages, when they've already got a solid paradigm here. If anything, I think EvE is a good inspiration, in that they've committed to only upgrading the existing game as they move forward, rather than ever trying to start over.

    You start over when things are broken beyond repair. WoW isn't even remotely close to that mark.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •