It matters because it creates a bad atmosphere. Like having stagnant water pools in a areas help mosquitoes and germs to breed there. Now you can kill the germs and mosquitoes or you can clean the water pools. If you stop caring about the dirty water, you'd have mosquitoes and germs all over the place.
But lets go a bit further: If you start protecting the germs and mosquitoes because they've got rights, then there's less focus on cleaning the dirty water around. And the mosquitoes and germs are still there. Stronger than ever.
Last edited by ttak82; 2015-10-08 at 11:22 AM.
A lot of the pedophiles who get caught have child pornography on their computers/devices. That obviously is a crime. Just head fantasies? That is not illegal, disturbing yes but illegal no. Acting out those fantasies for real obviously becomes a crime.
Still if someone comes "out" as a pedophile they should rightfully never work with children. They should get any help they need.
No, you only wanted them rounded up and contained Also, how is a visit from the Police a valid response to your "reasonable" suspicion? "Hi, we were told you are a pedophile, how are you today sir?" It only alerts the "reasonable" suspect of being a suspect. Monitoring sounds like a solution to yield better results.
Your argument is silly. "Homophobia" works as an insult because there's absolutely no reason to be afraid of gay people. There are no consequences for having gay people around, causitive or correlative. There are absolutely, without doubt, actual real world consequences for having pedophiles around certain groups of people. There's not a real counter-argument to that beyond "well, but if they don't." Yeah, IF they don't. Putting foxes in charge of guarding the hen house is fine too, IF they don't get too hungry. Its absurd to say that not letting foxes guard henhouses is discrimination when we've got perfectly functional guard dogs, and other perfectly fine jobs for our foxes. What i'm getting at is that SJW stuff works exclusively on the idea of popular support and group shaming, which does not function in this case. SJW language games don't work in this case because, rather than being a cultural construct, fear and revulsion for pedophilia is rational and correct. Which means that if some 17 year old calls you a pedophobe on twitter, you respond with "so?" and everyone agrees with you and the game ends. So no, SJW people are not going to magically force you to accept pedophile babysitters, that's not how it works.
They know it is wrong, most people know it is wrong. The ones who act on it were ones that were going to no matter what we teach them. The only time that is applicable is outside of Western culture. It is the same arguement as the teach men not to rape, its just a different target.