Different people are different, but I doubt most guys around 15-16 would mind if their decently looking somewhat busty teacher wanted to bang them.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Under Your Spell you belong on Resetera or Neogaf,, they are pedo friendly.
Even if you find it normal to have sex for money with fourteen years old when you are thirty, most society on Earth frown upon this and the ones who don't frown upon this are the ones with a version of shotgun wedding. It's not normal to have sex with a minor, even if the usual suspects find it normal.
I sure hope that black mass on her crotch under her yellow bikini pic is a tattoo that reads "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here."
Because if not, holy crap that is just vile.
For all we know these boys found her fugly
As soon as people stop using words wrong.
Then don't imply that "studens = pedo".
What's dumb is using "pedophile" to describe someone who has sex with a teenager.
I'm not saying that they aren't victims. She did blackmail them into having sex with her, after all.
\
And you probably would have walked away with 12 variations of drippy dick. She's a horrible person and a pretty obvious skank.
Hey edgelords who keep droning on ''she is ugly'' (again, she is ugly compared to actresses and anime girls, but frankly the average poster should really aims for Marge Simpson instead of Jessica Simpson...), does that means that molesting priests with rocking abs can do whatever they want ?
I think local culture is relevant here. I'm not going to pretend to understand Columbian culture, but there was this weird as fuck documentary on a regional Columbian tradition of boys having sex with donkeys before moving on to sex with women, and the documentary talked about this expectation for boys to start having sex at a very young age.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw documentary is here, and it is gross.
In the US, there's this perception that everyone in high school is having sex, but in reality it's less than half.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
Nobody is saying that (i hope). It's wrong regardless of attraction but nothing wrong with consensual sex between a 16 and 40 y/o... A bit creepy yeah but still legal in UK
- - - Updated - - -
I think it's average in UK for people to have lost virginity at 16/17
I would be so curious to see the faces of edgelords saying ''UGLY LULZ'' and whose ''argumentation'' include ''YOU URE UGLYZ''. I'm sure they have rocking bodies. Sure of it.
Short of that, is there something even more irrelevant in sex crimes than ''what she was wearing'', it's ''was she/he hot'' ? In addition to the point that, presumably, Victoria Secret models most likely would not have to scoop down to teenagers to find partners, that an edgelord find someone attractive or not have ZERO relevance to the issue.