Then by that logic, they should bear the responsibility of having the kids with a man who did NOT want them......
I mean if women(plural generalization you used there) who have sex are 'intending to have kids, then they are intending to accept the financial, parental and legal responsibility for them.
Again, unless you have something else in mind. Because many of the women(plural here for me as well) I know have sex because they enjoy the feeling, NOT because they re looking to get pregnant. The ACCEPT that it may happen to them but still do it anyway, but for them it is because they 'enjoy' it.
No, it doesn't. It's joint responsibility. If a man doesn't want a kid at all costs, he has the options of v-sec, condoms (how own, never anyone else's), and/or any eventual male BC. The woman can have her tubes tied, condoms/female condoms, and/or any BC. Same as a man. These areas are exactly equal.
Where it is unequal from biology, and that isn't something we can just change at the push of a button, women are the ones who have to carry the pregnancy, so they're also the only ones who can decide over keeping it or terminating. Yes, people can get fucked over, it does happen, and it sucks ass that it does. so take precautions if you want to have sex but not a kid. And don't ever fuck someone you don't think you can trust.
And I said in an earlier post that I think men should have the option to 'abort' as well, but it must be concluded before elective abortion is cut off. If the woman still chooses to keep the pregnancy after that, she cannot demand any money from the bio-dad, and goes on government support. This can be used as an emotional bludgeon towards pregnant women not in a relationship, and it will be abused, same as any other system for everything else. As long as it is a very small minority though, it's 'acceptable', if it evens the odds out more.
However, in the end, societal stigma over not treating offspring properly because the parents are being shitheads is there for a reason. The kid had no say on being born to just 1 parent with possibly no money to tend to them, regardless of the gender of said parent.
You dont think having a baby brought into this world is a consequence?! Hell, having a fatherless baby brought into this world. You don't think that's a fucking consequence?
Or that having an abortion isn't a consequence?!
In what damned way, do you think a woman just "gets away with it"?
You're super confused here, pal.
You cannot prevent that which has already been underway for several weeks or months. You can terminate the process, but without a time machine you cannot "prevent" something which is already in place.
If I stuck a knife into your gut you could go to the hospital and have it fixed, but that trip to the hospital does not make the stabbing have never happened. The police and you will still want to see me in jail because I still stabbed you. You got it fixed, sure. But undoing the damage does not mean it never happened.
Prevention means keeping it from ever happening, it does not mean fixing it after the fact.
Taxpayers are represented by government, government wants that kid, government uses its resources to support that child, taxpayers provide the resources. It's a cycle. This is what state is all about. Collect a share of wealth and redistribute. That's what taxpayers pay the taxes for. That way each taxpayer will pay some marginal fee for the child support. Instead of a single taxpayer who not only pays taxes but also gives a significant portion of their income as child support.
It won't kill ya, in fact you won't even notice. But I bet you will bitch about it.
- - - Updated - - -
You can prevent it from continuing. Duh.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
You would have thought the answer was given in your previous bullshit threads on the issue:
https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...wants-abortion
https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...wants-abortion
Obviously, you haven't learned anything.
Yes, and throughout this thread I have stated that BOTH accept responsibility. But see here there is one distinction, if a man says he does not want kids and has sex with a woman who says she does then BOOM if he sticks it he accepts it.
If he sticks it inside a woman who knows he does not want kids, then BOOM she accepts responsibility for the result because she a( did not she any form of contraceptive and b) she chose do to so knowing what the consequences were, thereby accepting them knowing the man did not want kids.
Moral of the story is BOTH have the responsibility and decision to make. It is the woman that has the final say. If the risk aint worth the reward then DO NOT DO IT
Dont have sex then, simply as that.
The main reason for sex is gettin children.
you stick your dick in, you pay.
Men up and care for the child too, the child doesnt deserve scumback parent who fuck of or just gettin pregnant for money or for the lulz.
people need to grow up and take responsibility for their actions, Women too!