[Megathread] Fire and Fury

[Felya]

Ok pal goodnight

Don’t call me pal, buddy!!

Have a good night!

[Deleted]

Ahhh his tweets are so embarrassing... like a kid he rages against "sloppy Steve" again and this time reveals Bannon cried when he got fired!

[Omega10]

The most telling part of the book isn't what is actually written but that there is no real way to tell what's real and what is not.

And the fact that exists is an extremely telling statement on Trump and his administration and family.

And, combined with the fact that a huge majority is likely to be true, it ends up being quite damning. The desperation of the Trump supporters here is further proof that they basically believe the book, and that the book is mostly valid with its depiction of Trump.

[Deletedaccount1]

How will Sloppy Steve ever recover?

[Macaquerie]

How will Sloppy Steve ever recover?

He could reveal himself to have been a deep cover liberal this whole time. It'd be complete bullshit of course but I for one wouldn't mind, the amount of havoc he has wrought on the conservative movement is truly legendary, by the time this is all over and done with there won't be a single prominent Republican with a shred of credibility left.

[ezgeze]

Bannon is a leach and was fired because he was leaking NK details. So bannon invited this guy to sit in the white house and "collect" information from whoever would talk to him, aka "bannon". The author literally just then collects whatever he hears and transfers them to a book without sourcing who gave him that information. We also know portions of the book are 100% incorrect already and the guy even said in interviews that the information in the book were never checked into but basicly whatever he heard while in the white house, again, his source was literally bannon himself. The book is nothing but the National Enquirer but in paperback or hard copy.

[Draco-Onis]

Bannon is a leach and was fired because he was leaking NK details. So bannon invited this guy to sit in the white house and "collect" information from whoever would talk to him, aka "bannon". The author literally just then collects whatever he hears and transfers them to a book without sourcing who gave him that information. We also know portions of the book are 100% incorrect already and the guy even said in interviews that the information in the book were never checked into but basicly whatever he heard while in the white house, again, his source was literally bannon himself. The book is nothing but the National Enquirer but in paperback or hard copy.

Bannon did not invite him Trump did, also there are other sources noted and recorded in the book but I understand that you are just spouting what you have been told. it's funny watching alt right people suddenly turn against the grand priest of the church of Trump.

- - - Updated - - -

How will Sloppy Steve ever recover?

Grovel and praise will get him back into Trump's good graces and soon all of yours as well.

[ezgeze]

Bannon did not invite him Trump did, also there are other sources noted and recorded in the book but I understand that you are just spouting what you have been told. it's funny watching alt right people suddenly turn against the grand priest of the church of Trump.

- - - Updated - - -



Grovel and praise will get him back into Trump's good graces and soon all of yours as well.

Trump didn't invite him into the white house, bannon wanted him in there that's how he got in.

Yup that's it, just like how the radical left considered Bannon a trustworthy source of information a month ago. Oh wait, he is suddenly a left darling, I wonder why.

[JohnBrown1917]

Trump didn't invite him into the white house, bannon wanted him in there that's how he got in.

Yup that's it, just like how the radical left considered Bannon a trustworthy source of information a month ago. Oh wait, he is suddenly a left darling, I wonder why.

No, he is not lol

[Arvei]

There's no reason to believe the book itself is "bullshit". However, as said many times throughout this thread, the author does give a proper note at the beginning that what WH officials said themselves could be/is possible bullshit due to conflicting claims. And that's one of the major points of the book. It highlights the conflict and the dysfunction inside the WH.

[ezgeze]

No, he is not lol

Sure he is, he is getting his 15 minutes of fame. He is of course literally the source of the fire and fury and moonbat leftists are currently buying that rubbish book in droves.

[Deletedaccount1]

Grovel and praise will get him back into Trump's good graces and soon all of yours as well.

Sloppy Steve won't be in my good graces as long as Pinhead Larry and Dirty Dan are the sheriffs of this town.

[ezgeze]

Sloppy Steve won't be in my good graces as long as Pinhead Larry and Dirty Dan are the sheriffs of this town.

Bannon is and has always been looking out for #1, Bannon. He literally ruined breitbart and turned it into his personal satire news source and rode his way into the white house because of mercer. He was the source of the white house leaks to the NYT and the cause of much of the disfunction there. Good riddance.

[Ripster42]

He believes that his son is treasonous?

We get it. You don't have the capacity to understand the point being made. You're just driving that fact home now.

[Draco-Onis]

Trump didn't invite him into the white house, bannon wanted him in there that's how he got in.

Yup that's it, just like how the radical left considered Bannon a trustworthy source of information a month ago. Oh wait, he is suddenly a left darling, I wonder why.

Trump invited him after seeing a cool cover from something he wrote, Bannon is not a darling of the left heck only the alt right loves him. You are mistaking our glee at watching you guys attack one of your own with love. Since at the core of the alt right is one law Trump is always right if Bannon gets in his good graces you will be back here saying how wonderful he is just like a good automaton.

[ezgeze]

Trump invited him after seeing a cool cover from something he wrote, Bannon is not a darling of the left heck only the alt right loves him. You are mistaking our glee at watching you guys attack one of your own with love. Since at the core of the alt right is one law Trump is always right if Bannon gets in his good graces you will be back here saying how wonderful he is just like a good automaton.

Umm no.

and hate to break it to you, but nobody liked bannon. If you think the right did, you were reading it on breitbart and bannon essentially runs that so yeah. No. unless you have the visitor records from the white house, USAT, not exactly a right wing publication has reported that almost all access was given by Bannon, why? Because bannon was marginalized early on, pretty much shoved in a closet with his stupid whiteboard, with nothing to do all he did was leak stuff to NYT and sit down with Michael Wolff, gossip and tell him how important he was and how he was really the one pulling the strings.

[Cthulhu 2020]

This sounds like the parallel to the Bush story. They guzzled the shit out of Bush kool-aid, and when he was out of office they were like "Nahhhhhhhhhhhhh didn't really like him."

They guzzled Bannon's kool aid and loved the shit out of Bannon, and now that Trump has denounced him and the two cucks are literally fighting (Trump and Bannon) the Trumpites and Bannonites are now literally having an internal war, and the respective sides are now tearing each other apart.

And then when Trump is finally out, even the Trumpites are going to deny ever liking Trump.

The right has such blind tribalism to whoever is holding the power at the moment, but will immediately flip on them when they're no longer relevant and claim they never supported them, ever, which anyone who's watching the shitshow knows is rubbish, but it's still funny as fuck to watch all the flip flopping on support.

[Grapemask]

Umm no.

and hate to break it to you, but nobody liked bannon. If you think the right did, you were reading it on breitbart and bannon essentially runs that so yeah. No. unless you have the visitor records from the white house, USAT, not exactly a right wing publication has reported that almost all access was given by Bannon, why? Because bannon was marginalized early on, pretty much shoved in a closet with his stupid whiteboard, with nothing to do all he did was leak stuff to NYT and sit down with Michael Wolff, gossip and tell him how important he was and how he was really the one pulling the strings.

Almost all of your posts here are troublingly wrong.

Bannon was known to be a key member of Trump's team until he was being pushed out by Kushner, and then Kelly. Trump and most people who interacted with the White House acknowledged this. The narrative only changed as soon as Kelly got in the room, but I understand Trump supporters have fluid memories that are able to completely reshuffle and realign when their overlord tells them it must be done to accommodate new narratives.

But moreover, Bannon was always Trump's link to some of his more... hardcore support base. The "middle-right" does not like Bannon, absolutely. But the far right and the alt-right love the guy. They have perhaps begun to sour on him recently, because his wording has started putting him in an awkward place opposite of their adored power structure. But marginalizing that role, like marginalizing his role in the White House, and being willing to believe that that was always the case when it provably was not, is mostly a sign of mental illness.

[Deletedaccount1]

Bannon is and has always been looking out for #1, Bannon. He literally ruined breitbart and turned it into his personal satire news source and rode his way into the white house because of mercer. He was the source of the white house leaks to the NYT and the cause of much of the disfunction there. Good riddance.

A lot of the current political muck would probably have been avoided if it weren't for Andrew Breitbart's untimely death.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Almost all of your posts here are troublingly wrong.

Bannon was known to be a key member of Trump's team until he was being pushed out by Kushner, and then Kelly. Trump and most people who interacted with the White House acknowledged this. The narrative only changed as soon as Kelly got in the room, but I understand Trump supporters have fluid memories that are able to completely reshuffle and realign when their overlord tells them it must be done to accommodate new narratives.

But moreover, Bannon was always Trump's link to some of his more... hardcore support base. The "middle-right" does not like Bannon, absolutely. But the far right and the alt-right love the guy. They have perhaps begun to sour on him recently, because his wording has started putting him in an awkward place opposite of their adored power structure. But marginalizing that role, like marginalizing his role in the White House, and being willing to believe that that was always the case when it provably was not, is mostly a sign of mental illness.

It's funny because there's literally a war going on on /pol/ and it's completely divided between the Bannonites and Trumpites. /r/TheDonald went full Trump support and as soon as Bannon released scathing statements about Trump, they turned on Bannon where they loved him before. Meanwhile Breitbart of course is now calling Trump a cucked president and distancing themselves from him.

Truth is most of these people loved Bannon and you're perfectly right, they loved him when they agreed with him, and tend to have a fluid memory about who and what they love. As soon as Trump is out over some kind of charges, they're all going to go "Yeah we never liked Trump anyway" and jump back on the Bannon-wagon which will inevitably go right back to talking about how evil the left is as soon as Trump is out of the picture. Bannon isn't a left wing darling. Everyone knows he's the leader of the reactionary deplorables, who's going to go right back to trying to savage the left when the crybaby in chief is no longer his primary target.