Why judge people by the fact that they're not from the same patch of dirt that you're happened to be born on?
Why judge people by the fact that they're not from the same patch of dirt that you're happened to be born on?
- Dare not to sleep -
The biggest problem with immigrants is them breeding like rabbits when the natives feel they can't even support a family.
Nothing wrong with pride in your land. Nothing wrong with wanting people to enter it legally. But to just blindly label them all as something that is wrong or to be afraid of its just stupid.
While I'm no fan of social justice, the statement ". . . we need to understand the root of the problem." and arguing in favor of xenophobia contradict one another. A xenophobic approach would just be the polar opposite to the naively open social justice approach which isn't much better. We need to address the reality of the situation and not just run off of preconceived notions.
The most Xenophobic cultures in the world are the ones you (the western world) feel xenophobic about. i say this being Egyptian myself and able to see its effects around me.
look how fantastically prosperous xenophobia has made us become, and then rethink your strategy to combat how to handle your own.
Nothing wrong with it. Way too much immigration in many countries...which sucks for the countries.
Well
As a non european, even though id love to live in europe if i could; id not let any immigrants to EU if i were you. Most of us dont deserve to live in a civilizied european country. We will ruin it.
As an American where we all accept that you can have your culture and I can have my culture and we all get along somehow, I find your stance to be the epitome of hilarity. when you say Multiculturalism in regards to Europe it’s always with an * because clearly the concept is well beyond you guys, for some reason cough*.
Last edited by Sky High; 2018-01-07 at 09:33 PM.
No, because we haven't experienced similar immigration in the past. The people coming in the past were labor migrants who came to work, were more culturally similar to us due to proximity and needed to have some kind of education to show to even get in(With the exception of people from balkan in the 90s which was a temporary spike and not decades long like with arabs and africans), unlike the people who come here under the pretense of being refugees from african and arab nations and then behave like invaders.
Xenophobia is wrong because its counterproductive. Sure, Japan has always tried to seal itself off against foreigners, but it's not a coincidence that the greatest advances in their economic and societal development came when the barbarians broke down the gates and forced their way in anyway. And when countries do manage to successfully seal their borders against invasion, they tend to find themselves short on workers and needing to coax outsiders to come do all the dirty work for them. I can't see why so many people are in favor of some monocultural society when there isn't a single example of that actually working.
It leads to cultural stagnation. When you look at cultures that have gone a long period without influxes of new people they come to a point where they cease to advance and become overly insular. Ironically, in the case of east Asia this is exactly what was happening until relatively recently, it's why the far less xenophobic west was so technologically advanced in comparison. You can also see this in the middle east, where places like Iran went from a modern country to the current status due to extremely xenophobic practices.
As for your first example, Japan is actually the least xenophobic is has been in the last several centuries. Japanese people take pride in learning English (and frequently practice it with foreigners), cover their products with English phrases and often treat tourists as minor celebrities. Japan is isolated less xenophobic.