http://www.wowhead.com/news=275306/b...mpler-spoilers
very last line
nice try.
http://www.wowhead.com/news=275306/b...mpler-spoilers
very last line
nice try.
Well the most obvious reason is of course revenge because after all Genn Greymane just ruined her plans of attaining immortality. Also have you forgotten that the Forsaken require ongoing conflict in order to not die out? They need bodies (seemingly human bodies as I don't recall seeing any undead orcs, trolls etc. in Undercity/Tirisfal etc.) in order to create new Forsaken. They've attacked Hillsbrad, they've attacked Gilneas (unfortunately for them, the worgen curse made the Gilneans immune).
Ongoing peace means extinction for the Forsaken. They're undead monstrosities after all.
Last edited by Nerovar; 2018-01-22 at 03:21 PM.
Two linens above it, the clause that the sentence-fragment is a part of.
"It is, for the moment," she said. "Injuries need time to heal. Crops need to be planted. But soon, I will call upon the brave fighters of the Horde for another battle. The one you and I have both longed for."
Otherwise she's just saying "Stormwind" for no fucking reason.
Nice try.
For one thing: The Forsaken don't need more people if there's no war. If there's no war, they continue to exist as they are -almost indefinitely. Sure they'll rot over time, but if there's no war, they can spend their time looking for solutions.
And even if they do need more people: People die ALL THE TIME. Accidents. Age. Disease. Raise 'em. It's not like you need a birth rate in the thousands per month to maintain your numbers, between WC3 and Wrath there were no more Forsaken made, only the ones who already existed (Some of whom were trapped in their coffins) and they had enough people to keep the kingdom running.
It's only because of War (and the threat of it) that more forsaken are needed so drastically, because war results in dead Forsaken.
Revenge on Greymane I'll give you, absolutely. It's what I think she's talking about in the Christie Golden novel.
But that means she wants HIM. Not to "Nuke Everything" to get more corpses as has been posited.
- - - Updated - - -
That's not really headcanon, I'm pretty sure he would, too, since he warned her the Horde would rise up if she was weak (And Peace = Weakness)
And she does care. She puts on this disaffected attitude to try and present herself as uncaring. But if the Forsaken were -just- a Bulwark against the infinite the initial idea that the Desolate Council were traitors wouldn't cut her so deeply or elicit such a strong response that Nathanos has to correct her before she even opens her mouth.
Last edited by Steampunkette; 2018-01-22 at 03:32 PM.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
Initially she reacts with betrayal. But when Nathanos explains they're not rebelling but just handling day-to-day affairs she's mollified and calms down. She's upset, again, when she learns they're not hot to trot on the immortality train but Nathanos reminds her, and I'll remind you, that she gave them Free Will and they're exercising it.
She could've mind-controlled them and had actual meat-shield slaves (Still might if she winds up going raid boss since even that might not be a bridge too far if she's really threatened and goes off the deep end) but she didn't. She sees them as people...
Which is more than you can say for the Alliance.
- - - Updated - - -
LONGED FOR implies that for some period of time they've wanted the battle.
But there's fuck-all to show that they've longed for a battle against Stormwind or the Alliance.
Genn? Sure. He's in Stormwind, counseling Anduin. But Stormwind itself?
There's never been a -hint- before now. Which is why I think it's a rhetorical flourish. 'Cause it's either that or a Retroactive Continuity. And the only thing Stormwind has ever "Done" to them is not letting them join the Alliance back at the end of WC3/Beginning of WoW.
Maybe -that's- why they've longed for that battle? But it feels... stretchy.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
Appreciate your time with friends and family while they're here. Don't wait until they're gone to tell them what they mean to you.
You know the last line "Stormwind." was connected to the line before which states "
Nathanos was silent. She did not take that for disagreement of disapproval. He was often silent. That he did not press her for more details meant that he understood what she wanted." which was connected to the line with "The one you and I have both longed for.".
Try to process this information, and tell me again what she might have meant with "I will call upon the brave fighters of the Horde for another battle. The one you and I have both longed for."
Please do that, simple logic and common sense.
- - - Updated - - -
Of course it feels stretchy and out of nowhere. That's what I mean before, if the author of the novel really twists it somehow, that Sylvanas does not want to have anyhting to do with a battle for Stormwind, it would be a really fucking bad prelude, it just makes 0 sense. Also there is still the reason, that Stormwind consists of a lot of Humans which she might want to revive as Forsaken, so there is that.
As you said: Forsaken decompose and Forsaken can also die to accidents/homicide etc. and do you honestly think they could just go to the humans of the Alliance and ask them nicely to give up their dead loved ones so they can inflict them with the curse of undeath?
If the Alliance doesn't give them bodies, the Forsaken will decompose and eventually die out if they don't start a war to obtain more bodies.
Prior to Wotlk the Forsaken didn't really need to create new Forsaken because their main goal was to destroy the Lich King and not to exist as a nation of undead people. This is best reflected in the character of Sylvanas herself who commited suicide after the defeat of the Lich King because the only thing that kept her "alive" was revenge (now it's fear).
To say that Forsaken need to create more Forsaken because of war is a delusional confusion of cause and effect. After all it's the Forsaken who are trying to expand their borders at the cost of other races all the time.
Edit: also regarding the whole free will thing. Didn't the Forsaken try to create more obedient slaves in the sludge fields by experimenting on prisoners of war?
correct
also look up fenris isle, a group of humans trying to escape the undead, you kill them and raise them literally right away, and 90% of them are "praise sylvanas" well the odd one yells "what have you done to me" but is still forced to join the forsaken
- - - Updated - - -
theramore was filled with innocent people, did you even see SoO where mothers and fathers were forced to fight to the death for the "true horde"'s amusment or have their children slain?
Yes. Of COURSE the last line is Stormwind and connects to the previous statement and the internal monologue/thought process. No shit. The issue is that it's one they've LONGED FOR. Why have they longed for it? When did they long for it? There's nothing elsewhere in the game, books, or comics that shows them longing for it, so whenceforth came the longing?
Which you clearly understand, based on the other half of this post so I don't understand what the fuck you're trying to say, here.
If Sylvanas's "Battle" at Stormwind isn't one of mass-slaughter of the occupants of Stormwind and is instead an attack specifically on Greymane it certainly undermines the idea that she wants to completely obliterate Stormwind to get more corpses to raise because -that's- what the argument was in the first place. Me pointing out that she doesn't want destruction for destruction's sake, or destruction to just grab some more corpses. She wants immortality, which is what -she'd- probably use the Azerite for, as opposed to just making a nuke and dropping it on Stormwind.
It's an issue where I'm trying to make one argument and in the process of defending that argument from 4 different people they each present diffferent sub-arguments and shit gets tangled.
Would every human from Stormwind be all "Yes. Raise grandpa from the grave, please?" No. But some would. Some love-lorn folks would gladly seek undeath to return their lover to the land of the living because "Even death cannot end our love!" or whatever. There would always be people who want to cheat death, too. Who sign contracts to be raised when they die because they don't want to go.
Would it be as much as a war? No. But there's also people dying on other battlefields that don't INVOLVE the Forsaken who could be raised to fight again for their King and Country, or go home with honors and laurels for having sacrificed themselves in the line of duty to spend their remaining years with their loved ones.
And yeah. There were some Forsaken who tried to do that. And Sylvanas wanted them dead for it. She gave them Free Will and they tried to take it from others because they had the choice and made the wrong one.
As to the "Expanding their Borders" thing: Hillsbrad and Gilneas were both Ordered by Garrosh. Sylvanas didn't get a wild bug in her bonnet and decide to go kill people, Garrosh would've killed her if she refused (And she values her life more than any other) so she went to war. And then she used the Plague to minimize Forsaken Casualties in the battles while the Val'kyr raised more soldiers both against Garrosh's orders because she could conserve lives that way.
Also worth noting? She took a Hostage to force a peace agreement when the Worgen resurged in their fighting. She could've just dumped more Plague on them, and the 7th Legion, and sent more of her people to die in a costly, but ultimately successful campaign because the Plague is basically Mustard Gas.
But she chose to keep her people alive. Even though she could always just raise more off of the battlefield, she kept the ones she's had, the ones who are loyal and have been since WC3, even when Putress and others betrayed her...
Last edited by Steampunkette; 2018-01-22 at 04:12 PM.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
We're talking about sustaining a nation. Again there are several flaws with your argument 1) A few desperate people seeking to prolong the lives of their dead loved ones is simply not enough 2) why would they want them raised when they're not going to see them anyways. After all they're Forsaken now and are probably going to Tirisfal3) The people of Lordaeron recognised that their own home was in ruins and pretty much lifeless but it was their home nonetheless. Why do you consider that these people of the Alliance would even want to be part of an undead kingdom that is far away from their own home?
As far as I can remember Sylvanas only wanted the responsible forsaken dead because they also experimented on Forsaken.
So within a single argument you say that 1) Sylvanas couldn't refuse Garrosh's orders because he would have killed her and 2) that she did so anyways by creating more Forsaken. wew
I think I'm actually done discussing. This is too much.
The mineral itself is the weapon/bomb. It's highly explosive they said at blizzcon aswell. The ammount mined will be used to explode Darnassus. If the alliance hadnt intervened who knows what else.
Just as you say about North korea, the horde's intentions are clear and the mining is an act of war. The alliance retaliated to that. The horde is still the agressor. The operation was shutdown because unlike with north korea the horde is not interested in any kind of peace talks and horde champions were told to kill anyone on sight. So, it is painfully obvious they were the ones that started hostilities.
Last edited by mmoc80be7224cc; 2018-01-22 at 04:44 PM.
Neither faction is good or evil - depending on who you are, you tend to think you're the good guy, and "they're" the bad guy. I was born/raised in America - taught that we were the best country on earth, and the arbiters of all that is good and righteous in the world, and we were lucky to be born in such a great place. Then, after high school, I moved abroad. Everyone that I ever met from other countries said the same thing about their homes (some exceptions for people who had left pretty dire situations). I don't really want to turn this into an irl political thing, but just to say I gained LOTS of perspective about the actual state of the world once I left the US and could see other countries and their people up close, and could see the US from the outside.
It's the same with Azeroth. I play Alliance, but there are plenty of blinded idiots in this faction. My character (Paladin, now the leader of the Silver Hand which accepts all Paladins) would not discount or fight the Horde simply because of their races or affiliations. As a Paladin, my character would fight users of the Void who were on the Alliance sooner than Light users who happened to be Horde. There's not a universe in which my Paladin would align with Void Elves...yet, that's what my faction leaders are doing...
But, is that right? Is Alleria evil because she's aligned with the Void? Can I condone the forced subjugation and attempted submission of Illidan, even though he didn't want the Light forced on him? It's all a matter of perspective. Just like irl, everybody believes they're right and good, and their enemies have it wrong, and in reality we could all use a little more discussion and empathy, rather than jumping to conclusions and fighting.
This is the reason this whole free will is utter bullcrap. At the first mention of a different opinion Sylvanas feels betrayed and upset. Why would that be? Maybe because she doesn't want her pet zombies to think? She just wants them to be there to prolong her life.
She does not see them as people. She keeps them to protect her. And what about the Alliance? They don't see rotting walking corpses as people? Oh the humanity.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, but would your paladin fight greedy goblins literally bleeding your planet dry?