You know what the worst? Sylvanas fans who say she isn't evil. She is. She cold hearted bitch and basically Lich King 2.0. Its okay. Its part of her story and her character development. But these people basically denying part of her character for sake of her being sunshine bunny.
But it only stops if you drink the worgen blood or become Worgen, it doesn't matter if you are human, the human part in all this doesn't matter. And think there is a misunderstanding here.
I meant that Sylvanas sacrifice one of her Val'kyrs to save Vol'jin's life, not raise Vol'jin as an undead troll through mass resurrection, as the Val'kyrs does to all the fallen human soldiers. But more as of *Jumps in, take his place, the Val'kyr dies, Vol'jin survives* As the Val'kyrs have been doing time and time again for Sylvanas specifically, she got 4-5 of them left now or something? Then the same could been done for Vol'jin, to save the Warchief of the Horde. Again, this might only work for undeads, as Sylvanas is after all, an undead. I don't know and thats why I asked the question if some one know, interesting thing none the less.
So how is the Alliance (your own words)"retaliating against the wrong target"? Again, she might want to capture it, but she might end burning it instead. How would it look if she attacks it and can't capture it? She might rather destroy it than be humiliatingly repelled.
Listen here sourface varian, i read War Crimes so I know the law... everyone else is to blame for the villain's evil deeds
but seriously though, when it's revealed to not be her doing, come back to this thread and make a formal apology to Queen Sylvanas for these false slanders
Because the Alliance would be attacking the Horde for burning down Teldrassil instead of attacking whoever burned down Teldrassil?
Like if I walked into Teldrassil while everything was happening on Darkshore, dumped a shitload of kerosene, and dropped a match on it, the Alliance should come after me, right? Not talking about "Me, playing a horde character" I'm talking about me the person, here.
If they went after the Horde for burning it down, when I burned it down, they'd be going after the wrong people.
Now if I -didn't- burn it down. If instead it was a situation where Sylvanas captured it and had Malfurion and Tyrande sign a peace treaty ceding the land in exchange for safety and safe passage to the EK the Alliance coming after the Horde would be a breach of their own treaty... Which, y'know, would be something they'd probably try not to do?
Whole "Tries to be Lawful society" and everything.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
idk friends i was always on the side of horde not being the bad guys but i dont think blizzard is anymore and as usual they will rewrite every character to fit whatever idea pops into their head
with garrosh at least we had our rebellion to prove the horde wasnt evil. now we have the same story and sylvanas playing the same character as garrosh except that this time we're told we all are on board with her plans
like what is going on with battle for azeroth seriously. it honestly seems like all the old writers are gone and a bunch of new ones arrived and took a superficial look at the lore then decided on a new story to fix all the problems they saw with it. "the red team look like they're meant to be evil but they dont act evil enough. lets make them more genocidal. hey isnt it weird that each continent doesnt belong to one side lets fix that *knocks down darnassus and undercity*
i fear for the future of our game my wow friends
I mean, you would have to be kind of a noob to the Warcraft series if you seriously think that Horde is in anyway the 'good guys of the series.' There is an entire series of games before World of Warcraft that it's based on. You're seriously calling me an Alliance fanboy when I literally have a Warcraft 3 Troll Shadow Shaman icon as my avatar. Dude, maybe it's time to just admit when you're wrong, lmao. Being the cool bad guys is part of what made the Horde awesome, at least to me. It's a shame that over the years so many delusional Horde fanboys have deluded it to "Alliance light" or "red Alliance" that it has ruined playing Horde for me. The Horde is supposed to be like the bad ass biker-gang of conquerors that take no prisoners and show no mercy kinda group. If they want to burn some stupid tree, then good. I love it. That's what the Horde is supposed to be. Let's put the W A R back in Warcraft and stop pretending like the Horde is some care bear friendship is magic garbage.
Last edited by epec; 2018-02-14 at 06:02 PM.
One thing I haven't seen brought up yet: did Sylvanas intentionally opt to lose Undercity/Lordaeron? I know that may sound weird, but think about it in terms of her quotes.
While that does sound like a power hungry Saturday Morning cartoon villain, I also see something in there about "live and prosper without conflict." This quote does seem to show her aim being Kalimdor specifically, building an empire of strength within seclusion. This makes Teldrassil and the Exodar a problem for her on Kalimdor, but it also means that keeping Silvermoon and Undercity will expend resources she may not really want to. Combine that with the issue of the Desolate Council and how they seem to be building a rebellion to her in Undercity while she's away, it completely makes sense why she would want that closer to Orgrimmar if at all possible. Not to mention with the core spot of Azerite seemingly being Silithus (even though it's all over the place), Sylvanas specifically would want Silithus as a part of her lands."We take this azerite and use it to conquer Kalimdor.
We build the greatest empire ever known; one that is untouchable against the Alliance.
With the seas parting our lands, rather than mere borders, we can live and prosper without conflict.
That is how you ensure the survival of the Horde for the next hundred years, $n."
While a trade of such lands to keep the peace might be amenable to Anduin in an overall sense, there's no real way for that to occur due to the way the other races currently living in those lands would perceive it. This partially may be her intent for attacking Teldrassil, a small scale war for long-standing peace. But what to do with her own lands in Eastern Kingdoms? She very well can't abandon the Undercity without looking weak to the Horde, nor could she get the Blood Elves to abandon the Sunwell. So...you have a small scale set of troops on your side there, bring in some War Machines and the like to show your strength, but you create a fight you intend to lose. We fought hard everyone, but we have to abandon the Undercity. Here's some blight in the meantime to make it uninhabitable to all.
What does this do? This makes it so that the Forsaken are back on Kalimdor with you, makes it look like you really can't protect the Sunwell right now due to the Alliance's strength...but also shows that you are developing a way to do so later on. Plus, the Alliance's desire to get Lordaeron back in an overall sense will likely give them the drive to spend resources rebuilding it...resources that they might not instead be spending to assault you while you build up your strength.
Recruit a front-line Navy to protect your shores while building more Azerite weaponry, she may well have a way to empower the Horde over the next 100 years.