What exactly did you refer to then by "for-cash ass"?
Totally. Do enlighten me then, oh great master of literacy, what does an "exception" mean in context of age of consent then. Or hell, start with "age of consent".
And explain this here example of New Hampshire, since it has age of consent set at 16 and an R&J exception:
"The age of consent in New Hampshire is 16. But a close-in-age exception exists where a person may "engage in sexual penetration" with a person older than 13 but younger than 16 but only if their age difference is three years or less."
If the R&J exception lowers the general rule of 16 being the age of consent to 13-15 when the partner is less than 3 years older than the person below 16, who is the general rule of 16 aimed at and where are its limits specified for this rule to exclude 30 years old as you claim? And with how old people can a 30 old have sex then? If you say 18, then do explain what's the point of some states having 18 as age of consent that's supposedly aimed at teenagers? Humor me.
And to make you understand the nature of your reading proficiency here, another exception from New Hampshire:
"However, if the partner is acting "in loco parentis", e.g. as a teacher or a guardian, the minimum age is 18."
Hmm, if only teachers, guardians and the like can't have sex with someone below 18, what is the allowed age of the other partner for literally everyone else? Hmmmmmm. If only there was something that specified the age of when someone can consent to sex... Alas, we'll never know. But I suggest that when society develops enough to create such a concept, it should be called something like age of consent.
What's the age of consent in Ottawa?
If the student was of legal age I can see maybe not sending her to prison. If the child was underage lock her up and throw away the key.
She needs to be barred from teaching regardless.
That statutory rape is a pretty stupid concept for teenagers ?
Should she be fired and face consequences ? Sure, a teacher shouldn't engagne in a relationship with a minor student.
Should she be put in jail ? Nope, that's stupid if it wasn't an actual real rape. NOT when both parties are consenting.
Let's stop pretending teenagers are fragile flowers, they aren't.
I really hate the double standard of statutory rape being okay with some people if the perp is a woman. It also sucks that even if I try, I have a much harder time getting angry about a woman being with an underage male than the other way around.
Look at all the closet women haters come out when anonymous XD
Here's a picture of the perp, aka perpetrator.
Yes there's a double standard, everyone knows it.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
You actualy don't. Swiss law is pretty smart with this by giving a 2 years gap under 16.
a 14 with a 16 is legal for exemple. And past 16 you're free to make your own choice. Teacher aren't allowed to pursue relationship with minor teenagers. And will be fired if they do. But won't face jail time if the minor was freely consenting.
What's wrong with a little boy banging a woman..? Get out of here..
Brains develop until 25. That's why America doesn't allow people under 25 to have sex, join the military, own guns, drink (which, according to America, requires the most developed brains somehow).
Oh, wait.
Age of consent is completely arbitrary. Obviously the best way to do it would be case-by-case, but that's not going to go over well, so an arbitrary number (15-18 generally) is set to blanket sweep punishments.