Page 19 of 26 FirstFirst ...
9
17
18
19
20
21
... LastLast
  1. #361
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Please. I've been pointing out his bullshit for over 4 years now. I know how he operates.
    So shut up then and stop responding?

  2. #362
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,024
    Hey, here's an interesting interview I found.

    MARTIN: So, Matt, what were the internet trolls pushing out this past week?

    TAIT: So one of the big things that the trolls have been talking about this week is - at the beginning of the week, British Prime Minister Theresa May released a statement on the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, who was poisoned in Salisbury in the U.K. earlier this year. The U.K. government has now claimed that two military intelligence officers for the Russian government were behind the poisoning and released a bunch of evidence behind it.

    The Russian government and Russian trolls have been really aggressively pushing this week this was not the case, trying to undermine the specific evidence that the U.K. government has produced.

    MARTIN: So the intention here is to undermine confidence in the investigation into this poisoning here, which is - obviously is a very big issue, not just in the U.K. but also in the United States because it shows kind of a cross-border intelligence operation, which no one wants, right?

    TAIT: Sure. And in the United States, the U.S. expelled a large number of diplomats as a consequence of this poisoning. And yet the Russian government's position is that they're not behind this. They want to discredit the British government's evidence suggesting that they are.
    Matt Tait is a current cybersecurity expert at the University of Texas, but he is former British intelligence. And I believe we're seeing he's correct.

  3. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    There is precisely zero people here who get to tell me to stop responding to whom the fuck ever I want. Nothing short of permanent ban will stop Shalcker from spreading his bullshit, so I don't give a fuck anymore about not feeding him.
    Carry on with your winning tactic then. Its like talking to alexa and expecting it not to respond. "Don't tell me to stop banging mah head against the wall!"

  4. #364
    Quote Originally Posted by Easo View Post
    Because brits are actually functioning democracy with strong institutions and thus can be held to an degree of accountability?
    Well, Russian institutions also can be held to "degree" of accountability. Pretty low degree, but still, it happens.

  5. #365
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Hey, here's an interesting interview I found.



    Matt Tait is a current cybersecurity expert at the University of Texas, but he is former British intelligence. And I believe we're seeing he's correct.
    "Troll Watch"--that's amazing. Thank you for the link.

  6. #366
    Quote Originally Posted by Deja Thoris View Post
    So shut up then and stop responding?
    Shalcker will keep up his paid narrative regardless of wethe rhe's "fed" or not. His initial to deflections to this thread was "Must be drugs!1" and "It's probably the daughter!"

    He's entertaining to engage in a "debate" with, whenever you're bored at work. Simply to see how far he can spin obvious shit, simply to divert from Russia, sadly he'll usually just fall back to whataboutism /shrug.

  7. #367
    Given that Putin said on TV that those two were identified, they are harmless civilians, and urged them to come out to media as that would be best for everyone, i'm pretty sure we'll get their side of the story soon enough.

  8. #368
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Given that Putin said on TV that those two were identified, they are harmless civilians, and urged them to come out to media as that would be best for everyone, i'm pretty sure we'll get their side of the story soon enough.
    Yeh well up until now, they where saying this is "russian hysteria" and they dont know anything about it... This changing story reminds me on someone.... hm... who might that be...

  9. #369
    Quote Originally Posted by SoLoR1 View Post
    Yeh well up until now, they where saying this is "russian hysteria" and they dont know anything about it... This changing story reminds me on someone.... hm... who might that be...
    It takes time to make sure they are actually harmless civilians across all agencies - or, alternatively, creating plausible narrative around them and falsifying/erasing records (if you're into conspiratorial thinking).
    Last edited by Shalcker; 2018-09-12 at 12:49 PM.

  10. #370
    Quote Originally Posted by tollshot View Post
    Aye, no doubt they are memorising their script as we speak.
    As well as counting their windfall from all paid interview and show opportunities.

  11. #371
    Quote Originally Posted by tollshot View Post
    A lifetime in prison would be more approprate, but who knows, they wouldnt be thd first russian spies to become tv personalities.
    There still wasn't even court hearing on Litvinenko... only "public inquiry".

    I guess UK law has no convictions in absentia?

  12. #372
    Dreadlord zmp's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Дания
    Posts
    979
    Did they find those two SUSPECTS yet? Weren't they using aliases according to British "Intelligence"?

  13. #373
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,024
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Ohh Putin said they had nothing to do with the incident.
    And I'm sure that the presidential decree Putin personally signed, just hours before the indictment, allowing Russia to call even more people acting on its behalf overseas "state protected assets" and allowing Russia to hide them from, say, indictments, was coincidental timing.

    Nobody believes Russia. Nobody believes Russian state-run propaganda. Nobody believes Russian trolls. They're a laughingstock across the world, and even they know it. I know, I know, post objectively false bullshit or no turnips in the food line.

  14. #374
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Ohh Putin said they had nothing to do with the incident.

    Okay folks, case is closed. Lets go home everybody.
    There is no "case closed" yet because we don't exactly know what UK wants to ask them - and what do they want to tell.

    Isn't it pillar of Western justice that accused should be able to defend themselves either way?

  15. #375
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    There is no "case closed" yet because we don't exactly know what UK wants to ask them - and what do they want to tell.

    Isn't it pillar of Western justice that accused should be able to defend themselves either way?
    Shalker the secret services of EU and not only, cooperate closely especially in counter terror info. Seeing so many EU countries joining the accusations, mean that they are all in the same page.

    The weird thing in the whole case for me, is UK's denial to present evidence to the public, which it doesn't really make any sense if you think about it.

  16. #376
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Except that it totally does.

    Intelligence agencies just spilling everything out to the open just to satisfy public curiosity is a retarded idea as it can put intelligence assets in danger, or reveal ways of gathering intelligence that the enemy (Russia) was unaware of.
    Not giving it though is recipe for corruption with "just trust us - because we say so".

    Can't be held accountable if you never admit to being wrong anywhere and pass the buck to other side that should reveal anything instead.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Here is their interview to RT (in Russian)

    I'm sure RT will have translation/transcript soon enough.

    - - - Updated - - -

    And yep, here is transcript:
    Quote Originally Posted by RT
    RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan has spoken exclusively to the two men the UK named as suspects in the Skripal poisoning – Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov.

    Margarita Simonyan: You called my cell phone, saying that you were Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov. You're Alexander Petrov, and you're Ruslan Boshirov. You do look like the people we saw in those pictures and videos from the UK. So who are you in reality?

    Alexander Petrov: We are the people you saw.

    Ruslan Boshirov: I'm Ruslan Boshirov.

    AP: And I'm Alexander Petrov.

    MS: These are your real names?

    RB: Yes, these are our real names.

    MS: But even now, frankly, you look very tense.

    AP: What would you look like if you were in our shoes?

    RB: When your whole life is turned upside down all of a sudden, overnight, and torn down.

    MS: The guys we all saw in those videos from London and Salisbury, wearing those jackets and sneakers, these are you?

    AP: Yes, it's us.

    MS: What were you doing there?

    AP: Our friends have been suggesting for quite a long time that we visit this wonderful city.

    MS: Salisbury? A wonderful city?

    AP: Yes.

    MS: What makes it so wonderful?

    RB: It's a tourist city. They have a famous cathedral there, Salisbury Cathedral. It's famous throughout Europe and, in fact, throughout the world, I think. It's famous for its 123-meter spire. It's famous for its clock. It's the oldest working clock in the world.

    MS: So, you traveled to Salisbury to see the clock?

    AP: No, initially we planned to go to London and have some fun there. This time, it wasn't a business trip. Our plan was to spend some time in London and then to visit Salisbury. Of course, we wanted to do it all in one day. But when we got there, even our plane could not land on the first approach. That's because of all the havoc they had with transport in the UK on March 2 and 3. Because of heavy snowfall, nearly all the cities were paralyzed. We were unable to go anywhere.

    RB: It was in all the news. Railroads did not work on March 2 and 3. Highways were closed. Police cars and ambulances blocked off highways. There was no traffic at all – no trains, nothing. Why is it that nobody talks about any of this?

    MS: Can you give the timeline? Minute by minute, or at least hour by hour, or as much as you can remember. You arrived in the UK – like you said, to have some fun and to see the cathedral, to see a clock in Salisbury. Can you tell us what you did in the UK? You spent two days there, right?

    AP: Actually, three.

    MS: OK, three. What did you do those three days?

    AP: We arrived on March 2. We went to the train station to check the schedule, to see where we could go.

    RB: The initial plan was to go there and return that day. Just take a look and return the same day.

    AP: To Salisbury, that is. One day in Salisbury is enough. There's not much you can do there.

    RB: It's a regular city. A regular tourist city.

    MS: OK, I get that. That was your plan. But what did you actually do? You arrived. There was heavy snowfall. No trains, nothing. So, what did you do?

    AP: No, we arrived in Salisbury on March 3. We wanted to walk around the city but since the whole city was covered with snow, we spent only 30 minutes there. We were all wet.

    RB: There are no pictures. The media, television – nobody talks about the fact that the transport system was paralyzed that day. It was impossible to get anywhere because of the snow. We were drenched up to our knees.

    MS: Alright. You went for a walk for 30 minutes, you got wet. What next?

    AP: We traveled there to see Stonehenge, Old Sarum, and the Cathedral of the Blessed Virgin Mary. But it didn't work out because of the slush. The whole city was covered with slush. We got wet, so we went back to the train station and took the first train to go back. We spent about 40 minutes in a coffee shop at the train station.

    RB: Drinking coffee. Drinking hot coffee because we were drenched.

    AP: Maybe a little over an hour. That's because of the large intervals between trains. I think this was because of the snowfall. We went back to London and continued with our journey.

    RB: We walked around London…

    MS: So, you only spent an hour in Salisbury?

    AP: On March 3? Yes. That's because it was impossible to get anywhere.

    MS: What about the next day?

    AP: On March 4, we went back there, because the snow melted in London, it was warm.

    RB: It was sunny.

    AP: And we thought, we really wanted to see Old Sarum and the cathedral. So we decided to give it another try on March 4.

    MS: Another try to do what?

    AP: To go sightseeing.

    RB: To see this famous cathedral. To visit Old Sarum.

    MS: So, did you see it?

    RB: Yes, we did.

    AP: On March 4, we did. But again, by lunchtime, there was heavy rain with snow.

    RB: For some reason, nobody talks about this fact.

    AP: So we left early.

    MS: Is it beautiful?

    RB: The cathedral is very beautiful. They have lots of tourists, lots of Russian tourists, lots of Russian-speaking tourists.

    AP: By the way, they should have a lot of pictures from the cathedral.

    MS: Your pictures, you mean?

    AP: They should show them.

    MS: I assume you took some pictures while at the cathedral?

    RB: Of course.

    AP: Sure, we did.

    RB: We went to a park, we had some coffee. We went to a coffee shop and drank coffee. We walked around, enjoying those beautiful English Gothic buildings.

    AP: For some reason, they don't show this. They only show how we went to the train station.

    MS: If you give us your pictures, we can show them. So, while you were in Salisbury, did you go anywhere near the house of the Skripals?

    AP: Maybe. We don't know.

    RB: What about you? Do you know where their house is?

    MS: I don't. Do you?

    RB: We don't either.

    AP: I wish somebody would tell us where it is.

    RB: Maybe we passed it, or maybe we didn't. I'd never heard about them before this nightmare started. I'd never heard this name before. I didn't know anything about them.

    MS: When you arrived in the UK, when you were in London or in Salisbury, throughout your whole trip, did you have any Novichok or some other poisonous agent or dangerous substance?

    RB: No.

    AP: It's absurd.

    MS: Did you have the bottle of Nina Ricci perfume which the UK presents as evidence of your alleged crime?

    RB: Don't you think that it's kind of stupid for two straight men to carry perfume for ladies? When you go through customs, they check all your belongings. So, if we had anything suspicious, they would definitely have questions. Why would a man have perfume for women in his luggage?

    AP: Even an ordinary person would have questions. Why would a man need perfume for women?

    MS: Where would an ordinary person see that you have a perfume bottle?

    RB: I mean, when you go through customs…

    MS: Long story short, did you have that Nina Ricci bottle or not?

    RB: No.

    AP: No, of course not.

    MS: Speaking of straight men, all footage features you two together. You spent time together, you lived together, you went for a walk together. What do you have in common that you spend so much time together?

    RB: You know, let's not breach anyone's privacy. We came to you for protection, but this is turning into some kind of interrogation. We are going too far. We came to you for protection. You're not interrogating us.

    MS: We are journalists, we don't protect. We aren't lawyers. In fact, this was my next question. Why did you decide to go to the media? Your photos were published some time ago together with your names, but you were keeping silent. Today, you called me because you wanted to talk to the media. Why?

    RB: To ask for protection.

    AP: You say we kept silent. After our lives turned into a nightmare, we didn't know what to do, where to go. Police? Investigative Committee? UK Embassy?

    RB: Or FSB. We didn't know.

    MS: Why would you go to the UK Embassy?

    AP: We really didn't know what to do. Where to go? Hello?

    RB: You know, when your life is turned upside down, you don't really understand what to do and where to go. And many say, why don't you go to the UK Embassy and explain everything?

    MS: And you know what they are saying about you, right?

    AP: Of course we do.

    RB: Yes, of course. We can't go out on the street because we are scared. We're afraid.

    MS: What are you afraid of?

    RB: We fear for our lives. And for the lives of our families and friends.

    MS: So, you fear that the UK secret service will kill you or what?

    RB: We just don’t know.

    AP: Simply read what they write there. They even offer a reward.

    MS: What do you mean? There’s a bounty on your head?

    RB: Dmitry Gudkov, if I am not mistaken, promised a trip to the UK to anybody who brings us to him. Do you think it’s OK? And you think we can feel just fine, walking around all smiling, talking to people? Any sensible person would be afraid.

    MS: Why did you call me of all people? Why did you contact RT?

    RB: We were reading the news today, your Telegram channel.

    MS: Now I know people read it.

    AP: You said it yourself. I don’t know whether I can mention this on air.

    MS: Just say it. If it’s something we can’t say, we’ll take it out.

    AP: “Let’s go, bastards,” you wrote.

    MS: Oh, that. I wrote, “Go to the back of the line, you bastards” [meaning other media]. [This is a quote from Mikhail Bulgakov’s novel Heart of a Dog.]

    MORE TO FOLLOW

  17. #377
    "MS: What are you afraid of?
    RB: We fear for our lives. And for the lives of our families and friends.
    MS: So, you fear that the UK secret service will kill you or what?
    RB: We just don’t know."

    Lul. Sure, Brits are gonna send hit squads after them. Sure. What kind of being high fantasy is this?

  18. #378
    The Lightbringer Cerilis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,191
    Quote Originally Posted by Easo View Post
    "MS: What are you afraid of?
    RB: We fear for our lives. And for the lives of our families and friends.
    MS: So, you fear that the UK secret service will kill you or what?
    RB: We just don’t know."

    Lul. Sure, Brits are gonna send hit squads after them. Sure. What kind of being high fantasy is this?
    That's probably no lie though....

  19. #379
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Here is their interview to RT (in Russian)

    I'm sure RT will have translation/transcript soon enough.

    - - - Updated - - -

    And yep, here is transcript:
    Sorry, but their story sounds like made up bullshit. Visit London and Salisbury? There are so many more interesting places to visit, they wanted to visit that city on that specific day and the only thing they could come up with is tall cathedral spire? They also don't look like average traveller, more like "быдло" look on their faces.

    I guess I was wrong about UK. Though I'm still not buying their reasoning that Putin ordered it. It just doesn't make any sense. What makes more sense is oligarchs ordering it because Skripal was helping police to deal with Russian mobs in Spain. Though response sending out diplomats makes more sense because its politicians that are responsible for current state of affairs in Russia where oligarchs control everything. Politicians don't want to make laws to fight corruption, so they are partially responsible for it.

  20. #380
    Quote Originally Posted by Binki View Post
    Sorry, but their story sounds like made up bullshit. Visit London and Salisbury? There are so many more interesting places to visit, they wanted to visit that city on that specific day and the only thing they could come up with is tall cathedral spire? They also don't look like average traveller, more like "быдло" look on their faces.
    Yep, it totally sounds like bullshit. Absolutely facepalm-worthy.

    Not to mention that cathedral, apparently, is in opposite direction from Skripal's house from train station.

    I guess I was wrong about UK. Though I'm still not buying their reasoning that Putin ordered it. It just doesn't make any sense. What makes more sense is oligarchs ordering it because Skripal was helping police to deal with Russian mobs in Spain. Though response sending out diplomats makes more sense because its politicians that are responsible for current state of affairs in Russia where oligarchs control everything. Politicians don't want to make laws to fight corruption, so they are partially responsible for it.
    I think i'll stick to my previous "mafia guys" version; i guess they still think they somehow can get out of it without getting the rest of "friends" into eyes of authorities...

    Either that or things are actually that bad in GRU; and then i guess with competence like this everywhere nothing short of WW3 is going to fix this mess...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •