This argument has been used a lot lately.
It was answered several times in the AMA and is being used constantly in MMO-C.
Some people are outraged because Blizzard didnt listen to their feedback to change the game on the Beta stage.
But is this really something reasonable to ask?
Beta lasted for less than 4 Months.
Feedback goes as far as saying "island expeditions suck", "Warfronts suck", "Azerite sucks".
So basically people wanted Blizzard to change almost the entire game in less than 4 Months.
Reasonable?
Also, people are asking to take part in "game development"
They want their feedback to effectively change the game as if they were game developers themselves.
Reasonable?
--------------
-When should player feedback take part in the game development?
-How much reasonable time should we give Blizzard to take actions?
-Who is to say if feedback "X" is reasonable and will appeal to the whole community (if the game actually gets changed)?
I think this are all VERY difficult questions...do you have the answer to them? I dont...and have no idea how we should approach the situation.