Would you have fired Jordan Hunt?

[Amalaric]

This is quite possibly the most savage insult imaginable.

Instead of feeling insulted you should feel awe and possibly pride at Apple for making such smart phones.

[Checkt]

How is kicking someone with intention to cause harm not violent?

because he wasn't actually intending to harm her. He was trying to be dramatic and knock her phone away....but this 'harden violent criminal' is so violent that he kicked someone who was barely even grazed, despite apparently hitting her in the face.

You guys are continually trying to characterize this guy as a violent criminal so you can have a 'hah! see it's both sides1111!' moment. When the reality is, there's little comparison.

Violence from the right equates someone driving a car into a crowd of people they disagree with, what people like you want to pant as equal is some walking Aspergers case pirouetting and missing his target.

[Venant]

That is a criminal action, which people can get fired for committing outside of the work environment since the dawn of time. Actually committing a crime is not same as firing someone simply for expressing a unpopular but perfectly legal viewpoint

Cuck Norris takes the phrase 'let your feet do the talking' literally

[Synros]

Typical male feminists... When they're not raping and taking advantage of women, they're assaulting them for having opinions that run contrary to SJW rhetoric...

[Checkt]

Good intentions doesn't justify shitty behavior. The path to hell is pave with good intentions (not religious by the way) so your logic is pretty flawed.

that would be very good were I tryna justify what he did. Simply stating an obvious fact that this guy isn't a 'violent criminal' doesn't equate to saying #freetheflowerguy

- - - Updated - - -

But he didn't mean to, though.

- - - Updated - - -



Who would have thought that a person committing a violent act that is punishable via a criminal code would be considered a violent criminal. Strange times, I know.

you keep trying to bring this back to the punishment when that's not what is being disagreed with.

Me finks someone has realized their backs against the wall and they've no where to go but to die upon their hill.

Couldn't care less if this clown gets punished or not -- do care about internet nerds tryna act like this is a heinous act of violence when it's not.

let me know when you wanna come back to the topic.

[McFuu]

I didn't have a problem with the guy until he kicked the girl with the phone. I agree that pro-lifers are shitty people, and that these ones in particular were engaging in shitty practices, but it's also pretty clear this guy wasn't pushed to the edge and angry; he was calm and collected, and was grinning when he attacked her.

If they were harassing a friend of his on the way into a clinic and he got pushed to the edge and snapped, that I'd have argued was justifiable. This, not so much.

That said, I also don't live in Toronto and have basically this video to work off of, so there could be context I'm unaware of.

They are people, like you.

[Jonnusthegreat]

Instead of feeling insulted you should feel awe and possibly pride at Apple for making such smart phones.

Omg it gets worse!

[Symphonic]

because he wasn't actually intending to harm her. He was trying to be dramatic and knock her phone away....

Malicious Destruction of Property... You can't justify things like that anyway. "I didn't mean to shoot you, I was just trying to scare you" is the same as "I didn't try to kick you, I was just trying to kick your phone". It's aggressive, and wrong.

That being said, his scenario of a 16 year old being raped and caused to be pregnant due to the rape, I would have no issue allowing her to have an abortion. The mother's mental health and emotional distress of feeling kicks from a baby who belong partly to the person that raped her, is something I can't imagine anyone having to suffer through. The issue I have is when people pretend the unborn baby is not a baby, and having an abortion is akin to having a mole removed from your skin, or an alternative to birth control pills.

[Checkt]

Malicious Destruction of Property... You can't justify things like that anyway. "I didn't mean to shoot you, I was just trying to scare you" is the same as "I didn't try to kick you, I was just trying to kick your phone". It's aggressive, and wrong.

That being said, his scenario of a 16 year old being raped and caused to be pregnant due to the rape, I would have no issue allowing her to have an abortion. The mother's mental health and emotional distress of feeling kicks from a baby who belong partly to the person that raped her, is something I can't imagine anyone having to suffer through. The issue I have is when people pretend the unborn baby is not a baby, and having an abortion is akin to having a mole removed from your skin, or an alternative to birth control pills.

Let me tell you this full stop:

I would rather be locked in a room with 10,000 violent criminals like this guy than someone who truthfully in their mind thinks that you can compare the mindset of someone who shoots at another human being with someone who kicks at a phone. The level of stockholm 'i get very little social interaction' syndrome people on this forum display daily is MIND BOGGLING.

[RampageBW1]

This is a good point, sometimes demonstrators like that can be very obnoxious, if everyone started roundhouse kicking them in the face then they would probably go away

So it's alright to "unintentionally" kick someone in the face just they disagree with you?

Just another brick in Good Intentions Ave.

[Polyxo]

Yes. That is the term when a Person uses physical force against another person. You seem to be really struggling with simple words today.

I'm struggling to take you seriously. Not just on this subject. At all.

[Synros]

What the actual fuck are you trying to say? What labels? Clothes labels? Fred Perry tshirts?

- - - Updated - - -



Do you have one example of that?

Yes, there are over 3 years worth of examples actually.

Just look at any time the cops go to shut down ANTIFA's violent rioting, and you'll hear them start chanting something about how cops are "Fascists" because they're not letting them destroy other people's property and assault anyone they deem as "Nazis"...

[Kasierith]

Of course. If you aren't emotionally stable enough to even follow the basic modern concept of use your words to disagree, I have no use for you. Nor do I have a use for people so deep in denial that they'll try to deny that kicking someone regardless of scope is a violent act because they're so deeply partisan that they'll grasp for any excuse possible to permit violence. Sorry, but companies don't owe you jobs.

[Jonnusthegreat]

because he wasn't actually intending to harm her. He was trying to be dramatic and knock her phone away....but this 'harden violent criminal' is so violent that he kicked someone who was barely even grazed, despite apparently hitting her in the face.

You guys are continually trying to characterize this guy as a violent criminal so you can have a 'hah! see it's both sides1111!' moment. When the reality is, there's little comparison.

Violence from the right equates someone driving a car into a crowd of people they disagree with, what people like you want to pant as equal is some walking Aspergers case pirouetting and missing his target.

How can you knock a phone away with a roundhouse kick without causing harm?

One of these days you'll run out of energy for gymnastics.

[Polyxo]

/facepalm

At least SJWs like Mormo, Endus, and Didactic know better than to come into a thread and defend something indefensible.

People like you don't so you just come in here and make yourselves look like idiots.

I guess you and meatrubber are going to scream home invasion the next time the kids next doors' ball bounces into your yard.

[zephid]

Keep in mind, Mr. Hunt didn't intend to kick a woman in the face, perhaps his employer should have taken that into account.

That's true, but he did intend to kick her phone.

[Venant]

So it's alright to "unintentionally" kick someone in the face just they disagree with you?

Just another brick in Good Intentions Ave.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions... and the broken bones of those who crossed Cuck Norris.

[Gramlen]

that would be very good were I tryna justify what he did. Simply stating an obvious fact that this guy isn't a 'violent criminal' doesn't equate to saying #freetheflowerguy

- - - Updated - - -



you keep trying to bring this back to the punishment when that's not what is being disagreed with.

Me finks someone has realized their backs against the wall and they've no where to go but to die upon their hill.

Couldn't care less if this clown gets punished or not -- do care about internet nerds tryna act like this is a heinous act of violence when it's not.

let me know when you wanna come back to the topic.

I never left. I'm still where I was when I started, believing that a man that commits a violent criminal act is a violent criminal and should be punished as a violent criminal should be punished, considering the context of the violent criminal act made.

I am more than happy to die on this hill, as I have a criminal code, decades of case law, and a country's worth of judicial pretext. All you have is that he didn't mean to, so he shouldn't be considered the criminal that he is.

I want you to truly take a moment, and consider how intimidated I am of your attempts to sway my opinion.

... or is that too many words?

[Synros]

/facepalm

At least SJWs like Mormo, Endus, and Didactic know better than to come into a thread and defend something indefensible.

People like you don't so you just come in here and make yourselves look like idiots.

It's clear people like him think they're in the right no matter what, and that any action is justifiable against those who don't subscribe to their rhetoric. Because after all, anyone who isn't a Far-Left SJW Communist is automatically a "Nazi"...

[Checkt]

I never left. I'm still where I was when I started, believing that a man that commits a violent criminal act is a violent criminal and should be punished as a violent criminal should be punished, considering the context of the violent criminal act made.

I am more than happy to die on this hill, as I have a criminal code, decades of case law, and a country's worth of judicial pretext. All you have is that he didn't mean to, so he shouldn't be considered the criminal that he is.

I want you to truly take a moment, and consider how intimidated I am of your attempts to sway my opinion.

... or is that too many words?

Too much bullshit, more accurately.

Die on that hill then -- but hurry, the sooner we kill off the, to quote your signature, REE from your ilk the sooner we progress as a species.