Originally Posted by
mickybrighteyes
I disagree... there was no effort put in on an alternative plan by the alliance at all. It was all in for causing as much damage as possible to the Horde and, by extension, the Zandalari. If they bothered to consider another outcome they could have made the horde look like worse and worse allies or a poor choice to back by NOT fucking with the Zandalari... not invading and making ridiculous demands of the King and killing him outright... and maybe actually opening op some form of communication (or used their damned spies for something useful instead of picking targets to blow up)
On this point... what reason should they have bothered with Alliance plights? They didn't even seek out the horde until Zul and the Princess brought Nathanos and the player in. I'm still unclear on events around Talanji winding up in the Stockades and what transpired for her capture and during her stay, though. Overall, I think it's a poor point of view to use the bold as point here... Though I might be biased since it's the point I'm levying against the alliance.
That's all well and good. But I don't particularly like how the faction that is supposed to work well with others and pursue diplomacy in some fashion is shown, straight up, blatantly ignoring diplomatic measures to:
1 - destroy enemy personnel and goods
2 - subverts local wildlife to their own ends
3 - immediately assumes the nation is against them
I know it's railroaded to have both factions get a new group added, but dammit if they just straight up ignored how some actions should have played out. Did Talanji and Zul really fucked up Stormwind when they got apprehended? I mean we know they fucked things up when they got out, but what happened before that?