Warfronts could be great if it included the players on the opposing team. I don't know why they would have a pvp version of island expeditions and not have a pvp option for warfronts
Warfronts could be great if it included the players on the opposing team. I don't know why they would have a pvp version of island expeditions and not have a pvp option for warfronts
FOMO: "Fear Of Missing Out", also commonly known as people with a mental issue of managing time and activities, many expecting others to fit into their schedule so they don't miss out on things to come. If FOMO becomes a problem for you, do seek help, it can be a very unhealthy lifestyle..
FOMO: "Fear Of Missing Out", also commonly known as people with a mental issue of managing time and activities, many expecting others to fit into their schedule so they don't miss out on things to come. If FOMO becomes a problem for you, do seek help, it can be a very unhealthy lifestyle..
You can "loose" a warfront if your commander dies... Sort of like how you win a warfront if the enemy commander dies.
Just because you claim you can't lose, doesn't actually make it true. All it takes is to understand how google works to see that its possible to lose a warfront.
At least you should turn the ressources in your chest to speed the shit out of the warfront
This is the only thing that matter, turn the resources at the right place to build the fucking catapult asap
It is also possible that tonight Scarlett Johansson, Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone come to my flat with 10 million Euro and invite me to an intimate party, it is just not very likely to happen.
The likelihood of losing a warfront, even with 15 people afking, is roughly equally high.
Agreed they are trash. IF I wanted to be a peon I would be played Age of Empires or the original RTS games.
You can attempt to refute my statement by using hyperbole if you want, it doesn't work though. At least you tried, unlike the OP.
The person i quoted claimed that you can't lose a Warfront. That was a lie, just like you claiming theres an equal chance of losing a wf as there is for 3 a-listers to go to "your flat" is a lie.
You can lose a wf if too many scrubs (like OP and the person i replied to) afk the entire scenario. And three a-listers are extremely unlikely to ever go to your parents house.
What I will say is that the Darkshore warfront is worse than the Arathi one. Both are basically 25-30m wastes of time but Arathi just feels funner to me and doesn't have the 10m of mob burning at the start. They to do make some major changes to them going forward just to make them feel even slightly fun to do.
Funny thing with Darkshore is those trying to take a shortcut and downing a mech with less than all three glaives causes the warfront to bug out. SO enough AFK and not enough iron for example and go at it with two glaives...voila. Technically not a loss of the WF, but a loss of whatever time you spent in there (and anybody unlucky enough to be put into it as players leave)
I'm only in it for the 20 god-pounding reward thingies.
Once I hit 750, #neveragain.
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/djuntas ARPG - RTS - MMO
Can you even complete a Warfront if the entire raid idles? You still need to build up the required buildings and catapults so you can get catapults to passively deal damage to the gate, and are literally the only means of destroying the gate. I'm not entirely sure if you actually need the other bases on the map, but I doubt that an idle raid group would finish just as fast as a raid that actively participates in the objectives.
I doubt that anyone thinks Warfronts that aren't a drag or fun, and they just want to get it over with.
i spend the entire warfront getting resources away from people and I never get kicked /shrug