Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
6
... LastLast
  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    isnt literally any picture of a hot woman real or fake "pixels on a computer screen arranged in a certain way"
    Just going to quote myself since your are too disingenuous to do it yourself:
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsWhimsy View Post
    More posters trying to equate two unlike things. Azshara is not real, but the objects in the images you described are real by your own admission. You cannot compare the two.

    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    lol you watch porn online? degenerate, the only way is to watch it in person.
    You're assuming I do, which is an ad hominem attack but I guess most lacking any real argument do so, and also now want to take your twisted version of what I said seriously. The hoops people will go through to protect their fragile minds...

  2. #62
    Her kind usually end up very hot indeed:


  3. #63
    Personally, i think her model (both forms) is indeed among the most attractive females in WoW (and that is an important limitation)...but what really draws me in is her Voiceover. That is just glorious. It has all of the depth and sinister tones of Sylvanas but mixed with much more arrogance and lasciviousness. After BFA so far (and Legion, too) was pretty disappointing for me in the "Villain VO" department - Azshara makes up for that.

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsWhimsy View Post
    More posters trying to equate two unlike things. Azshara is not real, but the objects in the images you described are real by your own admission. You cannot compare the two.
    It's not just about Azshara, but any pictures of fictional characters. While Azshara is not one of them, there are many "hot" video game characters with very human anatomy and proportions. Many also objectively look "better"than their IRL counterparts.

    The entire argument is just pointless.

    Let's compare that with porn. I will never meet any of the pornstars, and will never interact with them, so for all intents and purposes they don't exist to me. For the vast majority of people watching their videos, they aren't any more real than any "random hot videogame character" in some animated video.

    So what exactly is the difference here again? Fundamentally, there is no difference between a picture of an actual human, and and animated picture of a character who looks like a human. They are both pixels on your screen, nothing more.
    They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
    Holyfury armory

  5. #65
    It's threads like this that let me know we have a mental health problem in this world.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by ThrashMetalFtw View Post
    It's not just about Azshara, but any pictures of fictional characters. While Azshara is not one of them, there are many "hot" video game characters with very human anatomy and proportions. Many also objectively look "better"than their IRL counterparts.

    The entire argument is just pointless.

    Let's compare that with porn. I will never meet any of the pornstars, and will never interact with them, so for all intents and purposes they don't exist to me. For the vast majority of people watching their videos, they aren't any more real than any "random hot videogame character" in some animated video.

    So what exactly is the difference here again? Fundamentally, there is no difference between a picture of an actual human, and and animated picture of a character who looks like a human. They are both pixels on your screen, nothing more.
    If you can't tell the basic difference between a computer generated image and something that's tangible... there's just no hope.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsWhimsy View Post
    You've lost me in your realm of insanity.
    Apparently it's insane to say you don't have issue with the actual arrangement of pixels, but rather what the arrangement represents.


    Now your equating ANY emotion with arousal. Unlike comparisons must be your favorite logical fallacy. I'll leave you to your wallowing.
    arousal is an emotion and doesn't react any different to any other emotion... you see something, you react to it...You also conveniently ignored the last part.

    Anyway, funs over.
    Last edited by Kumorii; 2019-08-08 at 02:35 PM.

  7. #67
    Legendary! Dellis0991's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Detroit,Michigan,USA
    Posts
    6,238
    Quote Originally Posted by Aeula View Post


    Sure.
    I seen enough hentai to know where this is going...

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by alturic View Post

    - - - Updated - - -



    If you can't tell the basic difference between a computer generated image and something that's tangible... there's just no hope.
    When talking about pictures of people I know IRL, yes, there's an obvious difference, but that's not what we're talking about here.


    There's no real difference between a picture of a random human I have never met, and a fictional animated one. I have zero emotional attachment to either of them. A picture of a random hot celebrity, or an animated one showing the exact same content? Couldn't care less, they are for all intents and purposes the same thing.
    They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
    Holyfury armory

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by ThrashMetalFtw View Post
    Let's compare that with porn. I will never meet any of the pornstars, and will never interact with them, so for all intents and purposes they don't exist to me.
    That is a very flawed viewpoint. I've never met you so you don't exist to me.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by ThrashMetalFtw View Post
    When talking about pictures of people I know IRL, yes, there's an obvious difference, but that's not what we're talking about here.


    There's no real difference between a picture of a random human I have never met, and a fictional animated one. I have zero emotional attachment to either of them. A picture of a random hot celebrity, or an animated one showing the exact same content? Couldn't care less, they are for all intents and purposes the same thing.
    + a lot of celebrities actually spend money to look more like video game characters...

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by alturic View Post
    It's threads like this that let me know we have a mental health problem in this world.
    People act like the world wasn't always hilariously twisted. Before religion was invented, people used to walk into town wanting to marry a goat. It wasn't until people waved a book at them and told them that was wrong they stopped. Remember, when you're in the hot desert with no air conditioning, no electricity, and no internet, idle hands WILL do the devil's work as the old saying goes.

    And the Romans? Ever heard of public orgies?

    If anything, human beings today are way more restrained and curbed by societal norms.

    Now...



    Cue the sexy party!


  12. #72
    Legendary! Pony Soldier's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    In my safe space
    Posts
    6,930
    She seems like a total bitch so no.

  13. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by Dellis0991 View Post
    I seen enough hentai to know where this is going...
    It looks like it already got there.

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyphael View Post
    People act like the world wasn't always hilariously twisted. Before religion was invented, people used to walk into town wanting to marry a goat. It wasn't until people waved a book at them and told them that was wrong they stopped. Remember, when you're in the hot desert with no air conditioning, no electricity, and no internet, idle hands WILL do the devil's work as the old saying goes.

    And the Romans? Ever heard of public orgies?

    If anything, human beings today are way more restrained and curbed by societal norms.

    Now...



    Cue the sexy party!

    Dude...they never stopped. They just hid it instead.

  15. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyphael View Post
    And the Romans? Ever heard of public orgies?

    Since it's the only example you gave, public orgies aren't as twisted as someone's brain thinking "wow these computer generated pixels are hot, let me see if other people jerk off to them like I do". At least the public orgies were with real, physical people.

  16. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsWhimsy View Post
    That is a very flawed viewpoint. I've never met you so you don't exist to me.
    Until you replied to my post, that statment would have been quite accurate indeed. It sure was that way the other way around.
    They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
    Holyfury armory

  17. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by Kumorii View Post
    Apparently it's insane to say you don't have issue with the actual arrangement of pixels, but rather what the arrangement represents.
    No matter how many times you type it, it still doesn't make sense. The definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again expecting to get a different result; you keep typing the same thing over and over again expect it to, what? Magically come true? I can type a bunch of words and say you ought to be made fun of because reasons too.

    arousal is an emotion and doesn't react any different to any other emotion... you see something, you react to it...You also conveniently ignored the last part.
    Arousal most certainly reacts differently than other emotions; all emotions react differently. Do you feel aroused when you're sad? Well you should because by your own logic the two don't react differently. So I guess we go through life feeling every emotion at the same time every moment... And please point out this last part. You'll mention that I "left it out" but dare not bring attention to what I supposedly left out because you don't want to be called out on it.

    Anyway, funs over.
    I assume you are going to block me or just deny to respond further which is fine since I win the argument then, albeit much earlier and easier than I expected. At least you kept pace longer than many others.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by ThrashMetalFtw View Post
    Until you replied to my post, that statment would have been quite accurate indeed. It sure was that way the other way around.
    I think you broke down somewhere. You just typed two sentences and stuck them together with no meaning...
    Last edited by ItsWhimsy; 2019-08-08 at 02:46 PM. Reason: Added quote and response.

  18. #78
    Quote Originally Posted by alturic View Post
    Since it's the only example you gave, public orgies aren't as twisted as someone's brain thinking "wow these computer generated pixels are hot, let me see if other people jerk off to them like I do". At least the public orgies were with real, physical people.
    That's a matter of opinion. A vast majority of people in the world who practice religion kind of think orgies are for twisted, degenerate perverts, especially public orgies which aren't a thing anymore, not even in Amsterdam. Maybe on a private island.

  19. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by Void Fallen View Post
    She is supposed to be one of the most beautiful characters in Warcraft, so much so that she is titled "The Vainglorious". I wouldn't date her because she is a fucking videogame character and an octopus.
    You should look up vainglorious. It's not exactly a compliment.

  20. #80
    I'd have a hard time having a relationship with her. I'm a light sleeper and her glowing eyes would keep or wake me up at night, even if I was comfortable with them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •