Schumer and Warner, ranking Democrats in the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, bemourn the loss of Coats and Gordon.
I'll skip to the end: they both agree that Trump pushed out decades of experience to satiate his ego.
Anyone who disagrees with that is free to read this or any of dozens of articles in which Trump jokes and laughs about his crowd size vs Beto's while visiting hospitals where some of the patients of the weekend's mass murders agreed to see him. But what you won't read is Trump admitting he blocked the FBI and DoJ from going after white supremacists, or see him sighing HJ 40, because that would make him look bad.
- - - Updated - - -
This Axios article brings up an interesting point about several key international issues:
1) India vs Pakistan
2) South Korea vs. Japan
3) NK vs. sanity
4) Brexit vs. No Brexit
They all have something in common: silence from the White House.
There have been times in the past where the US has been called to mediate, especially as part of a group. That's not happening. In the case of India vs. Pakistan, for example, Trump volunteered to mediate the Kashmir situation, and immediately afterwards, India made their move without informing US first. That's a slap in the face.“None of these crises were made in America,” says Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. “That said, we have made it worse in each case either by what we’ve done or what we haven’t done.”
“All of these situations argue for quiet American involvement,” Haass says. “You need the United States, behind the scenes, encouraging people to say and do things that are constructive and avoid saying and doing things that are not.”
“That’s old-fashioned foreign policy. This is an administration that doesn’t seem to do a lot of that.”
The US doesn't have to enter into every international situation, that's true. But refusing to even offer allies help is bad enough. Offering, and being snubbed, is...hey remember when Trump said the US was respected again? That doesn't look like respect. That looks like a snub.
- - - Updated - - -
Reuters poll of economic experts increases the chance of recession next year from 35% to 45%. It's the highest result they've gotten yet.
Nearly 70% of economists responding to an additional question said the latest developments had brought the next U.S. recession closer.
“Certainly, escalating trade tensions through higher tariffs and restricted access to markets is hurting sentiment, increasing costs, damaging supply chains and weakening corporate profitability,” wrote James Knightley, chief international economist at ING.
“This then feeds through into consumer sentiment and spending more broadly in the economy with recession risks mounting.”