Page 1 of 21
1
2
3
11
... LastLast
  1. #1

    frost, warrior, holy priest and combat need to be nerfed

    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...1000#class=DPS

    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...#class=Healers

    These specs are ridiculously overtuned. Classes like hunter, paladin, druid and shaman have absolutely no chance at performing on a viable level. I understand people want no changes but if the tuning looks this bad (PS this tuning is worse than BFA) then I do not understand why the game is getting so much praise.

    It's a shame when half of the classes in the game are not viable. I think of this as an absolute development failure.
    "I feel bad for Limit , they put in so many hours only to come in second place" - Methodjosh

  2. #2
    People wanted classic, they're getting classic. And all the "balance" that comes with it.

  3. #3
    Gonna post the expected #nochanges before some1 else does, gotta keep the meme alive.

  4. #4
    If you're going to obsess over logs,parses and DPS meters,I don't think Classic is the game for you.

    Of course the tuning is worse than BfA,BfA has some of the best tuning WoW ever had,while classic wasn't even trying to be a 100% streamlined esport ready game,that's just not what the game was about

  5. #5
    LOL for a moment i thought i was on retail subforum. I had to double check (>_<)

  6. #6
    And still, every raid will want multiple hunters for rage dispells, multiple paladins for blessings and a druid for the Buff+BR.

    That's the thing: Classic has the absolute worst balancing of specs WoW has ever had and there is STILL a place to bring each class to a raid. BFA has some of the best balancing and if you REALLY only care about the DPS viability....it is actually even worse than classic.

  7. #7
    It's almost like we didn't know already for 13 years that Warriors, Rogues and Mages were by far the strongest dps classes in Vanilla. What did you expect, something different? It's going to get worse, I can assure you.

    1/10

    Edit : Also noticed a lot of those top logs are my current guild, and ex guildies from private servers hah.
    Last edited by Bigbazz; 2019-09-15 at 12:49 AM.
    Probably running on a Pentium 4

  8. #8
    Go back to retail, scrub.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Poe View Post
    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...1000#class=DPS

    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...#class=Healers

    These specs are ridiculously overtuned. Classes like hunter, paladin, druid and shaman have absolutely no chance at performing on a viable level. I understand people want no changes but if the tuning looks this bad (PS this tuning is worse than BFA) then I do not understand why the game is getting so much praise.

    It's a shame when half of the classes in the game are not viable. I think of this as an absolute development failure.
    We already knew that raiding was gonna be pretty unbalanced, but most people don't care and why should they?

    Classic is all about getting the vanilla experience as close as possible and this version of the game isn't focused on raiding anyways. Yeah mages might be super OP in MC and Ony, but really who gives a shit? These raids were farm content the second they launched and there's no point in taking only mages, because you will end up throwing away most of the loot drops. Also Classic isn't all about raiding, which is the reason why so many players are excited for it. If I wanted to do some high end raiding I'd play BfA.

    EDIT: btw. as for the healer stats, I don't think that priests actually dominate healing... it's just that there are so many priests out there and currently many guilds are unwilling to take more than 1 or 2 druids (which can often perform better than priests) to the raids.
    Last edited by RobertMugabe; 2019-09-15 at 12:42 AM.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathasil View Post
    BFA has some of the best balancing and if you REALLY only care about the DPS viability....it is actually even worse than classic.
    No, if you are gonna lie, refrain to post stupid stuff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRzxQA1Y7V0

  11. #11
    How is it that everyone else knew this and you didn't?

  12. #12
    Stood in the Fire
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    448
    You dont need parses and logs to play classic. Thats one of the charms of classic. Stop worrying about it and play the class you like and want to play and find a guild that needs a body. There are plenty of guilds that needs bodies and any class and spec and it will only get easier and easier to find a spot.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Poe View Post
    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...1000#class=DPS

    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...#class=Healers

    These specs are ridiculously overtuned. Classes like hunter, paladin, druid and shaman have absolutely no chance at performing on a viable level. I understand people want no changes but if the tuning looks this bad (PS this tuning is worse than BFA) then I do not understand why the game is getting so much praise.

    It's a shame when half of the classes in the game are not viable. I think of this as an absolute development failure.
    Paladin, Druid, and Shaman all have to pay the Hybrid Tax.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  14. #14
    I think you're playing the wrong game if you worry about silly stuff like logs.

    Play what you want and find a group of people who like to play what they want, then you all form a guild and you go kill stuff. It's not that hard.

  15. #15
    these kill speed are actually pretty hilarious especially when we are like week 3 in.

    I actually do wonder how much faster people can get.

  16. #16
    You're a flipping dumbo, mate.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Frozenbro View Post
    No, if you are gonna lie, refrain to post stupid stuff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRzxQA1Y7V0
    Yeah,look at this average guild and their average raid composition

    I mean who the fuck is method anyway? probably some other mid-range raiding guild

  18. #18
    Old God Mirishka's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Get off my lawn!
    Posts
    10,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Poe View Post
    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...1000#class=DPS

    https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zon...#class=Healers

    These specs are ridiculously overtuned. Classes like hunter, paladin, druid and shaman have absolutely no chance at performing on a viable level. I understand people want no changes but if the tuning looks this bad (PS this tuning is worse than BFA) then I do not understand why the game is getting so much praise.

    It's a shame when half of the classes in the game are not viable. I think of this as an absolute development failure.
    Except that's how it was back in vanilla. And vanilla is what people asked for.
    Appreciate your time with friends and family while they're here. Don't wait until they're gone to tell them what they mean to you.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Poe View Post
    It's a shame when half of the classes in the game are not viable. I think of this as an absolute development failure.
    You're 15 years too late complaining friend.
    “Nostalgia was like a disease, one that crept in and stole the colour from the world and the time you lived in. Made for bitter people. Dangerous people, when they wanted back what never was.” -- Steven Erikson, The Crippled God

  20. #20
    Lol people asking for nerfs for classic! they think this is retail or something? no changes QQ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •