Swinger lifestyle. Would you try it out?

[Muajin76]

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/20...g-swingers.cnn

For me, i'd only give it a go if my wife wanted to try it. I think it would only be a one time thing for me.

Has anyone ever tried it?

[Low Hanging Fruit]

Probably not. I can only imagine having extra people involved in a relationship would just be more complications. Sure, I get it, we probably aren't suppose to be hanging out with these people all the time but I probably am not going to be flying out of state or driving for hours to go do this. So odds are these people will be around. Just wouldn't want to deal with that at all.

[Chinese Bootlickers]

Nope. I don't like being "tied down", but also prefer to have a "monopoly" on/with certain people with certain relationships, cases permitting. The more moving parts, the easier it is to fuck up. Applies just as well to human relationships as it does to mechanics.

[Fluttershy]

only old gross people do the swingers shit.

So no I would certainly not want to join them.

[The Butt Witch]

I would be missing about 3 parties in this relationship.

[Puupi]

Nope. Never.

[Ashnazg]

Probably to some degree - I wouldn't see it as cheating if we always played together.

I also used to date a girl who had a husband, and I did it for about 5 months, so I am clearly not very possessive.

[Sunseeker]

Why get married if you want to sleep around?

[Ashnazg]

Why get married if you want to sleep around?

Because the primary point of marriage is not to get exclusive access to one set of genitalia.

[Katchii]

Because the primary point of marriage is not to get exclusive access to one set of genitalia.

That is entirely dependent on who you ask though, and I'd wager the vast majority of people would agree that it's part of the package. Primary point or not, it IS a stipulation in most marriages and "accessing other sets of genitalia" is grounds for a divorce due to infidelity.

[downnola]

Nah, it would kill the relationship for me.

[Ashnazg]

That is entirely dependent on who you ask though, and I'd wager the vast majority of people would agree that it's part of the package. Primary point or not, it IS a stipulation in most marriages and "accessing other sets of genitalia" is grounds for a divorce due to infidelity.

I'd wager that the true underpinning of most of those cases of divorce is the breach of trust and the lying/cheating/sneaking around that the other person is doing. Its not the fact that the other person is fucking someone else.

Which is why talking about it / doing it openly allows marriages to stay intact that may otherwise have collapsed.

[Katchii]

I'd wager that the true underpinning of most of those cases of divorce is the breach of trust and the lying/cheating/sneaking around that the other person is doing. Its not the fact that the other person is fucking someone else.

Which is why talking about it / doing it openly allows marriages to stay intact that may otherwise have collapsed.

Fair point, I suppose. The breach of trust is a huge thing, but when it's coming from the understanding that you won't be fucking someone else and you actually do I'm not sure the two are mutually exclusive. Trust is certainly broken, but in most cases it's supposed to be a monogamous relationship.

In some cases maybe they are mutually exclusive, but in the vast majority of cases marriage is about love and companionship between you and your spouse. Fucking someone else isn't part of that bargain. Not saying that's the only way it works, but that's the primary reason most people get married.

[Doctor Amadeus]

Fuck and No, I am far too possessive and so is my fiancee thankfully.

[Bodonius]

Never, do you but yes good luck your the problem. You think your kids will think what you doing is great? And how can you tell your kids for what ever they decide to do?

[Zan15]

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/20...g-swingers.cnn

For me, i'd only give it a go if my wife wanted to try it. I think it would only be a one time thing for me.

Has anyone ever tried it?

ba-ba-booooieeeee


Nah, I am not good looking enough to be so secure that I would not be driven insane with jealousy

[Mistame]

Because the primary point of marriage is not to get exclusive access to one set of genitalia.

On the contrary, if there was a rational reason to get married, that would be it. The entire point of a relationship is exclusivity.

[LilSaihah]

I have an interesting enough time with one partner. Hard pass.

[Stormspark]

Basically. "Fuck no". That's like telling your partner "eh, I'm tired of you and you aren't enough for me, so I'm going to go screw around".

On the contrary, if there was a rational reason to get married, that would be it. The entire point of a relationship is exclusivity.

I agree...if you don't want an exclusive relationship...don't get into one?

[PC2]

Maybe but it seems weird as hell. What if you end up liking your new sex partner better than your SO, or vice versa.

Low reward, high risk of creating problems.