Blizzard doesn't even know and doesn't keep count. "Some belong to the Jailer" is a total cop out explanation to justify showing more, making a finite number to begin with now meaningless.
Blizzard doesn't even know and doesn't keep count. "Some belong to the Jailer" is a total cop out explanation to justify showing more, making a finite number to begin with now meaningless.
that's a whole lot of wrong there.
only valkyr queens are capable of granting ascendance, she only has one kind of valkyr with her now, the lower kind their leader was the one who died to take the bitch queen's place in 'edge of night', and no, she cannot make new valkyr period, that was the entire goal of enslaving eyir who is Odyn's current valkyr queen.
Last edited by Malikath; 2019-11-16 at 08:32 PM.
post-explanation from a expansion release announcement doesn't matter when the entire power-up plays out prior, sorry.
if this shit didn't begin at BFA's start and play the role it did in the makgora with Saurgfang you'd have a point, but as usual you fail to muster a logical argument and resort to childish ad hom like a chimp with shit.
[Infraction]
Last edited by Rozz; 2019-11-16 at 10:23 PM. Reason: Minor Flaming
Technically All 9 of them now the Shadowlands has been riped open.
I did often wonder why would the valkyr would so willingly take her place in the maw to bring her back every times she died.
Guess if this was part of her plan all along then it makes sense as there death was always gonna be temporary if she pulled it off.
If you take being pointed out that you have to actually pay attention to understand something as a personal attack then I don't know what to tell you.
It was obvious for quite some time Sylvanas was gaining power, hell Kosak said all the way back in Cata that Sylvanas would gain power over time due to her pact with the Val'kyr. Granted we didn't know every detail, but to wave your hands and say there was no explanation is simply false.
He who argues with Sygmar has no respect for his own time.
I'M JOKING AUCALD, RELAX. No red text pls.
On topic,
Danuser said, and I quote, "What makes you think Sylvanas can't just make more Val'kyr?"
So trying to figure out how many Sylvanas has left is an exercise in futility.
I'm not sure why Danuser felt it necessary to throw Sylvanas' main motivation since Cataclysm under the bus for no discernible reason, but
here we are. Again. Writers seem to be more interested in big, cinematic set pieces rather than a coherent story.
That sort of writing strategy worked out real well for Game of Thrones. Who needs consistent themes, plot or character motivations?!
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Val%27kyr
Multiple lesser Val'kyr maidens were spotted in the skies during the Battle for Andorhal, and though they can raise corpses[19] these lesser Val'kyr are not part of the original pact and are thus not strong enough to revive Sylvanas.
I am right, the only thing not confirmed there is that the lesser val kyr are created by the "greater" val kyr, but it is the most likely thing
...We are going to the realm where they were taught to be created from...I don't think it matters how many she has left at this point?
- - - Updated - - -
But I do think those were Servants of Jailer in the features trailer
Both the terms and their meanings that you wrote here? Because entities that had been in the lore for over a decade are not even remotely unexpected. And last time I checked Sylvanas has been villain-batted the entirety of BfA and had the traitors to the Horde ran around unchecked.
There's very little wrong in what @Nephys said. That Scourge's Val'kyr can create lesser Val'kyr. That is explicitly explained in the Alliance conclusion to WPL questline. Those spawned ones are also literally called "Lesser Val'kyr". Indicating that the Nine aren't the lower kind. On top of that, only the Nine can resurrect Sylvanas, who is a higher kind of an undead, which shows how the Lesser Ones can't do that. And it's outright hinted at in the quest where Aradne dies that if the one of the Nine dies then perhaps the lesser Val'kyr spawned by her would dissipate. So what they got wrong is that the lesser Val'kyr die for sure when one of the Nine does.
As for Sylvanas being able to create Val'kyr herself or not, if you could read the post you replied to in full, you'd have noticed that it was @Nephys speculating. Though given how that it was their speculation about Sylvanas as she is in Shadowlands, using Legion's events is a poor argument against that. It's even poorer in light of the statement by Danuser that @Oneirophobia mentioned.
Except for the part where her power up is literally explained. Also, since when is Bolvar one of the more powerful beings on Azeroth? Arthas himself paled in comparison to pretty much any other end boss of an expansion with exception of maybe Garrosh. And Bolvar is like a dollar store knock-off version of that.
Yeah, no. An explanation doesn't magically cease to be an explanation because it happened after the fact. Expecting all explanations to be prior or at least during the fact is rather bizarre. It would make for a truly terrible storytelling, robbing the story of any potential for mystery and later reveals. And with how poor WoW's story already is, that's not exactly needed.
So sorry to burst your bubble, but @Friendly already has a point. You on the other hand, not so much. Let alone a logical one, because cherry-picking which explanations count and which don't with some arbitrary rules you made on the spot to pretend your position is valid is a clear-cut of a logical fallacy. There's also no ad-hominem in what they said. As opposed to your own post.
I feel like there was a specific amount that she had but then as she lost them the plot dictated that she needed more. So how many she has left is however many she'll need until she is defeated.