If thats what you got from either my post or the Gamers Nexus review (you know, those well known Intel shills..) then you have serious mental damage.
Uhh... whut? It isnt a win or a loss. It just is what it is.this is a win.
The fact that this is suddenly relevant to people after not being relevant at all for 20 years as some desperate grasp to try to find SOME way to denigrate the competition has always amused me. Especially given that which camp is in the right/wrong has shifted half a dozen times. AMD was the enemy because Bulldozer was a furnace. nVidia was the enemy because of XYZ, AMD again because of etc...dont need a huge amount of energy,
Even if the difference in system draw was super significant (it isnt), the total difference in cost to run the machine might be like 40$ a year if you live someplace where electricity is expensive like CA; if you're spending 2,000$+ on a rig, you can affford the difference. If you cant, then you need to not be spending 2k on a rig. And that assumes you're running the thing flat out all the time, which no one realisticaly does.
Not that it matters, because you know what else doesnt require a ton of energy? The 7700. You know what performs within the margin of error at resolutions people paying 2000$ for their rigs are actually playing at? The 7700. This wasn't about (ever) Intel vs AMD, this was about.. AMD vs AMD.
Neither does anything else, so what the fuck are you even on about?don't need expensive 7200+ mhz memory
Id hardly call my B660 motherboard "top of the line". Seems to work just fine, and it was 60$ cheaper than the B650 equivalent., don't need top of the line motherboard,
Neither does anything else. You must have investments in straw companies, what with all the strawmen.dont need 1000+ watt power supply.
The exact same can be said of Intel, though, FWIW, I wasnt even comparing them to Intel chips, but rather their own chips. And uh.. good luck putting that into A620 and having it perform well. Been participating in /buildapc a lot lately on reddit and that place is FLOODED with people having massive issues with the 5800X3D in budget-ish boards. It aint all hookers and sunshine. Not that its a serious issue, as decent midrange boards are perfectly fine and available for similar-enough prices that that isnt really the issue.just get a cheap 6000mhz memory kit, b650 or a620, and off you go to top fps.
"Even cheaper" at 450$and if you want to wait for 7800x3d, prices are going to be even cheaper then.
For no actual performance gain over even their own much cheaper (and quite good) chips.
Thats the issue.
Its expensive - substantially more expensive than their own vanilla CPUs - performs worse in everything that isnt gaming, and provides no meaningful performance gains at resolutions people who are spending that kind of money actually play at.
Again, i never said it was a bad chip (it isnt), merely that it is underwhelming that AMD hasn't figured out a way to make the vCache relevant for actual enthusiasts.
The Venn Diagram of "people who love playing at 1080p low details" and "people who spend thousands on their rig" doesn't overlap more than a few pixels.
And thats the issue.
Because even with the 7800X3D at 450$, what AMD is saying is:
"Please spend 450$ to enjoy a 15% performance difference over our 200$ chip at 1080p, and have no serious benefits at any resolution above that."
Thats a pretty hard sell for anyone who is actualy paying attention.
Thats my issue. I need AMD to make this technology relevant to people actually spending this kind of money on their rigs. Id be more than happy to buy it if it gave the same performance uplift to 1440p; hell, despite just upgrading my rig to a 13600K, i'd turn around and sell it and buy the 7800X3D .... if it were actually going to do anything.
But I game at 1440p.