More around 150 years ago. Not really actually, the law is still very much so the same on said matters. This is getting ridiculously off topic. You're using a defaming argument against the USA to prove what exactly? That you find your country to be better? I'd argue that there is a bit of bias in that, but at any rate you continue to try to lead away on merry go round tangential arguments, so this isn't worth debating anymore.
Its even worse than it seems. If the U.S. spent very little on healthcare then it might be understandable that its low ranked, but on a per person basis it spends the most of any nation in the world by a significant amount, and yet has abysmal outcomes.
The european systems cost much less per person and are way better. Yet the U.S. right foam at the mouth about this saying that national health systems are the devil incarnate. I just don't get it. Are they that willfully blind?
Congratulations and welcome to the civilized world, where you don't need to be rich to get healthcare if you are unfortunate enough to get a sickness that needs to be treated with expensive medicine and/or treatment.
And they are somehow preventing you from seeking private alternatives if you truly want...? Anyhow, any surgery that is truely urgent will be taken care of immediately in all of those countries. If your surgery is NOT that urgent, do you really think they'll take you in before those who have a more urgent need?
Health insurance is the reason for the "high costs" per person.... if we let free market run the health care like it should be, we would be able to get the best health care for the lowest cost, and would force new technologies to be built, and new advances to be made in the medical field that would help lower the costs for the world in general. but since we still have insurance companies, rates are what they are, and health care is what it is.... we need a true free market that is not touched by the government and our health care would be far better off.
No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.
I am guessing you refer to this part?
Notice that is says foreign state. That was not the case in the discussed event.If a U.S. citizen serves in the armed forces of a foreign state or as a
commissioned or noncommissioned officer of a foreign state engaged in
hostilities against the United States the administrative presumption of
intention to retain U.S. citizenship does not apply
This sums up my feelings on the matter. Good on paper, bad in practice. All this free relief for the lazy crap needs to go. And before anyone says it, yes, I know some people truly are unfortunate and laziness had nothing to do with their state. But until the system separates them from the lazy and the ones who abuse the programs (having kids while unable to afford them just to draw from these systems that others have to pay for) I will be firmly against it. Health care is no different. I agree with certain points of this, such as insurance not being able to turn people away for dumb reasons. But it should not be mandatory, and should not be a tax on the working.