logical? your statement is far far far from logical friend.
again, illegal drugs are making it into my nation (logical statement), so would the illegal weapons (again another logical statement).
AND just to clarify, your statement was far from logical champ.
oh and btw, there are already a shit ton of very illegal weapons making it into my nation.
i'm done with this thread, because fuzzy loves to hand out bans, and i'm not about to piss him off and getting myself banned when i just came back from vaca, and would like to be able to post more than a week of getting home.
Last edited by Shinoashi; 2012-11-10 at 06:30 AM.
Crime rates up? Let's not work on better police funding! Lets worry about giving random people guns to just kill the criminals! That will sure show them!
...
Gun control is stupid. If you think banning guns will fix anything, then that's wrong. The reality is that you are disarming law abiding citizens while criminals can still obtain guns. It is not hard to obtain a weapon illegally, even if someone is hindered they can make one if they want to. Guns should be legal, the owner should be responsible with it to keep it away from kids and locked up in case of emergencies. I lived in MA for 7 years and know 3 people that got robbed excluding my parents. The robbers KNOW there is no risk from the home owners, yet after being 5 years in New Hampshire I haven't met or heard of a local robbery yet (Guess what? The gun laws are not strict).
As far as I know, the places with more lax gun controls are statistically less prone to domestic crimes. I think letting a community arm themselves is a right everyone that is qualified should have... Assuming they are not lunatics.
There is risk everyday I walk outside.
I don't mind spending that small price of risk or statistic for my freedom.
Look at post 28 explaining how his logic makes sense.
If an action has harder and easier methods of happening. Hard=A Easy=B the average difficulty is C
If we remove the hard one then the average difficulty becomes C-A which is less difficult than C
I know its not a perfect mathmatical equation but it gets the point across I hope.
Here is the logical implications I said:
Item X is available by method A and B. Now we enforce the restriction not B. eg B is 0 or invalid. Hence now X is available only by method A.
In worst case scenario the amount of X will stay the same. But it is IMPOSSIBLE for X to increase. If you fail to understand logic, stop insult us who do understand logic.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.