I mean people are seriously acting like "pay everything yourself or abort because I don't want to care for this child" is the same as "I don't want to carry this child so I'm aborting and neither of us will pay anything".
this is why mens rights is regarded as a joke.
"we want fairer treatment in family courts..."
fair enough
"... so we will be able to gain custody of our children..."
alright
"... so we can abandon them anonymously at the fire station to avoid paying child support."
yeah... no.
Even if we don't take the emotional side of the abortion equation into consideration, the woman takes a much greater risk by having the abortion than does the man. He might not sleep that night, she might bleed to death or be left sterile for the rest of her life. Seems not so equally happy ending to me.
Seriously. It's ok for men to unilaterally decide that they don't want to pay for a kid that they helped to create, but it's not ok for a woman to unilaterally decide that she's keeping the kid and they both have to pay for it. That isn't equality at all, that is making the system better for men and far, far worse for kids.
Yeah, termination of a fetus (and the obligations that would come from it) is dealing with it. But apparently terminating rights and obligations are not?
---------- Post added 2012-11-26 at 11:10 PM ----------
You make the grave error of assuming that because a guy declines, she will change her mind.
After a hundred pages, it seems the answer to the topic question is "The MRM can stop being treated like a joke once they ask this question of themselves instead of angrily shouting it at everybody else."
No. The MRM needs to pick its battles better. Because there are real issues out there that they can fix. The one we are currently talking about just isn't one of them. If you can't see that you aren't making the situation equal, you're making it better for only the men, then there really isn't anything else I can say to you on this matter. You are just willfully not seeing it.