Poll: Do you Support Assault Weapons Ban?

  1. #20221
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Wow, you don't mind insulting millions of vets, do you?
    Yes, I insult them with my links and everything.

    I suggest you read about nuclear ships before commenting again.

  2. #20222
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Aelia Capitolina
    Posts
    59,362
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Wow, you don't mind insulting millions of vets, do you?
    Not particularly, no, since a lot of them vote Republican.
    Quote Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
    The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don't know each other, but we talk and understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same.

  3. #20223
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    No, the crew is deployed for 6-8. Carriers are out for years.

    You really don't know much about the Navy at all.
    Refueling is a once in a lifetime overhaul, carriers undergo far more work over their lives than just that. Carriers have ONE crew, they do not have a blue and gold crew like boomers do. It is you that doesnt understan anything about the US Navy. The only surface ships that are getting blue/gold crews are the LCSs, and even those require coming to port on a regular basis.

  4. #20224
    I now have a mental image of a bunch of "rebels" waiting by the sea wall for years remarking: "Well dey gotta come back some time."

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Carriers have ONE crew
    They why is the crew rotated every 6-9 months?

    You didn't read my link. At all.

  5. #20225
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    Yes, I insult them with my links and everything.

    I suggest you read about nuclear ships before commenting again.
    I am willing to bet I know far more about Nimitz Class carriers than you do.

  6. #20226
    Epic! Gemini Sunrise's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Caulking the river
    Posts
    1,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinykong View Post
    Right, because you didn't just say your .30-06 rounds "out class" everything but a few "sniper rounds" the military uses.

    ...and then forgot to mention all the cannon rounds and other ordinance that they would actually use against your imaginary rebellion force.
    And then you forgot if they aren't concerned about collateral damage (which they probably would if they are bringing out the big guns), collective punishment is also a possibility.

  7. #20227
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    I am willing to bet I know far more about Nimitz Class carriers than you do.
    *Looks at your post history*

    How much? TinyKong, Didactic, place your bets now.

    Because you didn't even realize a "deployment" refers to the crew, not the ship. Your "knowledge" of the USN makes me giggle.

  8. #20228
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    I now have a mental image of a bunch of "rebels" waiting by the sea wall for years remarking: "Well dey gotta come back some time."

    - - - Updated - - -

    They why is the crew rotated every 6-9 months?

    You didn't read my link. At all.
    I dont recall seeing anything concerning carrier crew rotaions in that article, quote it for me please.

  9. #20229
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Refueling is a once in a lifetime overhaul, carriers undergo far more work over their lives than just that. Carriers have ONE crew, they do not have a blue and gold crew like boomers do. It is you that doesnt understan anything about the US Navy. The only surface ships that are getting blue/gold crews are the LCSs, and even those require coming to port on a regular basis.
    Is there really a point to this discussion?

    They aren't going to need an overhaul, because after they destroy our infrastructure within 24-48 hours, they can just wait and after the water and food is gone, people will quickly lose interest in a rebellion.

    They don't even need to destroy the infrastructure, just send a few SF troops to take over major power plants and turn them off, and thats it, the rebellion is over.

    Good luck getting 20 million people pissed off enough to live without food or water for 45-60 days and then saying "oh yeah, go ahead and pick up those arms and fight against the most effective killing machine in the history of human kind."

    FFS.

  10. #20230
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    I dont recall seeing anything concerning carrier crew rotaions in that article, quote it for me please.
    http://usmilitary.about.com/od/navyj...ments.-ur1.htm

    Those selected work outside of their regular Navy job, and are deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan (usually for 12 months) to assist the Army and Marine Corps with combat missions and patrols.

  11. #20231
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    *Looks at your post history*

    How much? TinyKong, Didactic, place your bets now.
    I'm going with "Armchair Commando."

  12. #20232
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    *Looks at your post history*

    How much? TinyKong, Didactic, place your bets now.

    Because you didn't even realize a "deployment" refers to the crew, not the ship. Your "knowledge" of the USN makes me giggle.
    Funny thing, I was stationed on the USS Lincoln, CVN-72. I'm pretty sure I would remember if another crew swapped out with mine. Carriers have ONE crew. The US Navy does not have the manpower to provide multiple crews to carriers and airwings.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinykong View Post
    Is there really a point to this discussion?

    They aren't going to need an overhaul, because after they destroy our infrastructure within 24-48 hours, they can just wait and after the water and food is gone, people will quickly lose interest in a rebellion.

    They don't even need to destroy the infrastructure, just send a few SF troops to take over major power plants and turn them off, and thats it, the rebellion is over.

    Good luck getting 20 million people pissed off enough to live without food or water for 45-60 days and then saying "oh yeah, go ahead and pick up those arms and fight against the most effective killing machine in the history of human kind."

    FFS.
    Destroying the infrastructure only works if you are talking about a civil war with easily defined geographical splits. Else its a good way to make the general populace hate you.

  13. #20233
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Funny thing, I was stationed on the USS Lincoln, CVN-72. I'm pretty sure I would remember if another crew swapped out with mine. Carriers have ONE crew. The US Navy does not have the manpower to provide multiple crews to carriers and airwings.
    It's not polite to veterans to lie. You aren't one.

    Because if you had even but the slightest inkling on how nuclear vessels work, you'd know they could stay out to sea for years.

  14. #20234
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    ROFL, that is not the article you posted, and it isnt even talking about ships!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    It's not polite to veterans to lie.

    You aren't one.
    Lol, great come back.

  15. #20235
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    ROFL, that is not the article you posted, and it isnt even talking about ships!
    Because you asked me about crew deployments. Are you illiterate?

    That mission on BF3 doesn't count as naval service.

  16. #20236
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    It's not polite to veterans to lie. You aren't one.

    Because if you had even but the slightest inkling on how nuclear vessels work, you'd know they could stay out to sea for years.
    Oh dear god man.... You have ZERO clue about just how much other stuff is on a carrier that breaks, wears out, etc. Yes the hull can steam for years, but it can't FIGHT for that long. The airwing can't last that long either, as as we have few airwings than carriers....

  17. #20237
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    Oh dear god man.... You have ZERO clue about just how much other stuff is on a carrier that breaks, wears out, etc. Yes the hull can steam for years, but it can't FIGHT for that long. The airwing can't last that long either, as as we have few airwings than carriers....
    Yeah you've already demonstrated your "breadth" of knowledge to the rest of us.

  18. #20238
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    Because you asked me about crew deployments. Are you illiterate?

    That mission on BF3 doesn't count as naval service.
    The really funny thing is the paragraph in that article right above the one talking about deploying to Iraq says this: "The ships and subs also spend a significant amount of time docked at their home port. Most ships deploy to sea duty for months at a time (usually for six months, but up to nine months). Then they return to their home port for four or five months (during which time there will be several one or two week cruises for training purposes)."

    Check-mate, using your own article.

  19. #20239
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellhound View Post
    The really funny thing is the paragraph in that article right above the one talking about deploying to Iraq says this: "The ships and subs also spend a significant amount of time docked at their home port. Most ships deploy to sea duty for months at a time (usually for six months, but up to nine months). Then they return to their home port for four or five months (during which time there will be several one or two week cruises for training purposes)."

    Check-mate, using your own article.
    Apparently you don't know what "most" means. I guess that answers my earlier query about your literacy.

    Are most ships in the USN nuclear powered?

  20. #20240
    Deleted
    Gun control is useless if people are culturally violent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •