its not some random guy (unless you meant me as the random guy). Its a gaming journalist working for a Norwegian gaming/IT site. Just as credible as the one you linked. But everyone has their own taste and opinion i guess. I take most of these sites with a grain of salt anyways. I will decide when i play the game myself
Ah ok, thought it was just one of those random non-gaming journos that visit E3 just because it's a convention with a lot of people. Well, that is probably the only overall negative response I've read about the game from E3, but I think I'll stay optimistic for now. Hopefully CDPR will reveal some gameplay footage soon for us to see it for ourselves.
4/12/292277026596 15:30:08
This is the generation of cosmetics, not deep rpg games. Don't worry though CDPR, I'll buy anything you make, as it doesn't have the slime of Silicon Valley on it.
Hmm, I never saw that when I played through on my PS4, though I am not denying it happens. I never got to finish the game because it saved game got corrupted amid the many many many many bugs. Figured I'd wait till it got better and go back. Hearing good things lately. More stable.
He had a lot of positive things to say. Don't get me wrong. But he wrote that the gameplay he saw was mostly run and gun and no one taking cover or anything like that. But maybe what he saw was a bad player or just a unlucky sequence for all i know. Don't exactly know how these things are handled.
But we will find out soon enough. Hopefully gonna see more gameplay from gamescom in august.
According to the CDPR guy in one interview, the person playing the demo was some Counter-Strike pro.
Also, just to be clear, in case you didn't listen to every single interview they gave (which you really should, and not to some random Norwegian glorified blogger), they made it abundantly clear that most, if not all situations have several ways available for the player to go through them. You can choose to try to play a complete pacifist and never draw your gun, but that'll require some sweet speech skills and such.
So no, despite what this Norwegian blogger said, it's definitely apparently not going to be a "run and gun" game, although that is, as it obviously should be, an option.
Really worth a listen, really enlightened me more...
I love Warcraft, I dislike WoW
Unsubbed since January 2021, now a Warcraft fan from a distance
Totally gonna watch a "10 lies about this current trending topic" a game that isnt even out yet.
Totally gonna do it man.
I really need my fill of click bait youtubers.....
I got to the first lie, which was press lazily referring to the game as a "FPS" game rather than just a "first person" game. Seems pretty clickbaity.
https://www.vg247.com/2018/06/15/cyb...y-good-reason/
Awww yis, full nudity. And I actually dig their reason for it, it makes sense in the context of a sci-fi future where humans are augmenting and changing their body parts etc.
I'm sure the ESRB/PEGI/whatever AUS rating agency is called will love it : D
Its like when people tried to nude shame ex machina while missing a key aspect of the story. Nudity is actually very important to some story aspects. Changing body parts is one. Also, making things more human, IE more relatable and in the case of ex machina it was about sexuality and attraction are a big driving force in the reason we communicate in the first place.
You can create a more effective AI experience with an AI that looks human. More than you can with a robot that is just nuts and bolts so to speak.
Censorship people wont care though, pixels that look like nipples, ban it all!!!
Last edited by szechuan; 2018-06-15 at 09:48 PM.
A Fetus is not a person under the 14th amendment.
Christians are Forced Birth Fascists against Human Rights who indoctrinate and groom children. Prove me wrong.