Heh, point is. A guy that is 80-90kg, throwing a defensless 45k girl on the floor trying to take her cloths off is unacceptable.
Its "worse" because she couldnt defend herself, because she was obv not as strong as him.
"person vs person", sure you shouldnt attack someone, but if you are going to.. Pick someone your own size. So i say again, men should not attack women. If that makes me a knight, well thank you for that kind title.
“The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that.”
You don't know the definition of white knight, I posted it above for you.
The person I quoted directly said that if a guy beats another guy up it's just men being men, but a woman who is pinned down by her partner and cannot say no due to fear is a poor damsel in distress that needs saving.
Both people are victims, both need support in the same way. The white-knight only wants a womans affection as his reward.
Go and work on your blog.
I know dozens of women who could kick the shit out of you and every single man on this forum.
What about a guy that is 90kg throwing a 90kg man onto the floor, then kicking his head in, or beating it with a metal pole for 3 hours while he begs for them to stop. Is that ok? Because they're both the same size, he picked on somebody his own size. So that's ok?
Go away.
Edit: All women are "defenseless" right? You're disgusting. You are actually being more sexist than some of the people in this thread, and that's amazing.
Last edited by Choptimus; 2013-02-12 at 02:15 AM.
I'm not really sure where people have said that rape is worse than any other crime, other than the people accusing others of white knighting justifying their name calling by saying that we believe rape is worse than other crimes... which we don't.
It is however wrong to say that women are being judgmental and sexist when they cross the street to avoid any potential hazards, yet when a man takes caution and measures to stay out of situations that prevent him from being mugged, he's being cautious.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
You even quoted the context that proves I didn't say what you claimed.
Unless you really do get so frustrated that you force women into sex, I didn't call you a rapist. Since you hadn't confessed to such, I don't see why you'd think it applied to you.
And you making comments that seem to be aimed at justifying rape isn't quite the same as condoning rape. The latter suggests a moral approval that the former word does not.
It would really help if you stuck to what I actually said, rather than deliberately misquoting me. I mean, you even quoted the relevant context that made it clear I didn't say what you claimed I did.
No i knowpeople who even work as and are licensed therapists who have been around alot longer then you and other things. They all agree there ARE times when one CANNOT control themselves..It is VERY rare and often never happens in a modern humans life but it CAN happen.
---------- Post added 2013-02-12 at 02:14 AM ----------
It is not ALWAYS about power and violence is my point. And yes there ARE times when people do lose control. It is ironicaly a natural phenomenon..Not that people here seem to respect nature.
---------- Post added 2013-02-12 at 02:15 AM ----------
Yes and i did. But it is also VERY hard to do and i can EASILY see some people not being able to.
---------- Post added 2013-02-12 at 02:16 AM ----------
I didn't say raging boner....Seriously you guys often show a serious lack of even semi basic neurological/hormonal traits especially in regards to the most primal/basic parts of the brain.
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...1#post19508224 (Sorry, didn't feel like making a new post since I already had made a post about it before)
I was 13-17 years old during that time, my teen years were awful. Wasn't all of them I didn't want to have sex with, I liked some of them a lot. The ones I didn't want to have sex with but still did because I was afraid to say no messed it up real bad for me, they're the ones who got me drunk or on drugs and had sex with me. I liked the company(The good ones that was), don't regret the time but did get messed up by the bad ones.
I'm already in a relationship with the bestest boyfriend in the world and have been for some time by now.
Last edited by mmoc506e44f6eb; 2013-02-12 at 02:26 AM.
There's a reason we criminalize it.
If they literally couldn't stop themselves, they'd lack mens rea, and it wouldn't be a crime. At worst, they'd be able to plead temporary insanity, for the very thing you're claiming.
That doesn't happen, because what you're claiming is not true.
Well i said "blueeye" to the "tiny part".. Ofc beaten/stabbed, murder is just as bad, i didnt say that because i thought it was obv to everyone. But the higher % of men being involved in violence, (What i think, have experienced). Is that we fight for the smallest thing, as in, think 2 drunk men outside a club. 1 of them just happend to bump into the other, without doing it on purpose. And the other will the turn around start hitting around and be "all manly". Almost like teenagers. Silly example, but i have seen people fight over the smallest things. Wich then goes into the % of being involved in violence etc.
But i still stand by being raped is a whole lot worse than a "blueeye", mugged. Atleast i would gladly take a beatdown, instead of getting raped from behind, and im sure most men would:S
“The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that.”
Justification=/=reason. That is a key point here. Nor does reason mean excuse. We are merely saying there are more reasons that someone might do something aside from the "me must show dominance" argument.
---------- Post added 2013-02-12 at 02:22 AM ----------
Pretty much man...So many emotions.
I believe that being the victim of a sexual assault would be horrible. I also believe that being the victim of a shooting, stabbing, beating, murder, attempted murder, etc. would be horrible. You want to talk about sexual assault but you want to ignore every other type of violent crime, because men are more likely to be the victims of those types of crimes, so they don't concern you.
So we've established two things: You believe that sexual assault is worth talking about, and all other violent crimes are irrelevant and meaningless. You believe that female victims are not to blame for their choices, but male victims are.
Essentially, you're suggesting that violent crimes that are perpetrated against women are bad, but violent crimes that are perpetrated against men carry no weight. Flip that around for a second and ask yourself this: if a man suggested that violent crimes against men are bad, but violent crimes against women carry no weight, would you call that sexism? Of course you would, and you'd be right. What's good for the goose is good for the gander -- your sexism is showing.
Yes sorry i should have edited it. I was referring specifically to the last line in it...Some people here have assumed i condone/support rapists for saying that understanding reasons behind something can be good and that naming reasons means i justify/make excuses for it.