if this is true im gonna be so happy cos battlegrounds are fulla bots and not many people like to cap arena as 2v2 is imbalanced is there also any gear/weapon restrictions if its true
if this is true im gonna be so happy cos battlegrounds are fulla bots and not many people like to cap arena as 2v2 is imbalanced is there also any gear/weapon restrictions if its true
where did you get 350 a day from? As far as I could see 50 points a day is your revenue for an entire day. In all honesty I'm not convinced PvE should reward conquest points at all. Do we get PvE points for doing Arenas/RBGs and PvE loot?
I thought so too, but it's probably the last quest that gives you this
what so blizzard thinks you get 50 points for doing 7 quests a day thats fucking shit, it shud be 350 a day cos arena 2v2 is imbalanced and battlegrounds are just bot infested. if its 50 per day its not even worth doing the qwests for the rewards
how about you try doing some PVP to get your PVP gear?
and don't start with the damm valor gear! thats for the few pieces of gear that you never see dropping.
still blizzard is already going crazy with pvp atm...
malevolent elite gear thats upgraded is bis gear till ppl get 27K conquest earned.
so old pvpers get a huge advantage for months?
also dumbing down the itemlevel of pvp gear. so ppl can't get into LFR with em? hell i thought there wasn't THAT much of a difference in pvp to pve gear.
now where getting a ton less stats that are supposed to be balanced by giving em more pvp power and resi?
wheres the old model? new season means new pvp gear sets that have alittle more itemlevel?
screw these pvers that are fucking up pvp.
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/4...4841599821.jpg the boy that will forever be named the HHD wiper. R.I.P
Why don't you do just, you know 2 arenas, and win your 360 points (180*2) I mean, I get that it's nice to have a way to get some by yourself, but if it's 50 instead of 350, who cares? do 2 arenas, and win, or 1 RBG and win, and you got those points. If you're ONLY getting your points from Unrated BGS you don't really need the gear, do you?
To be competitive in BGs.
9,6 Mio play this game.
AWESOME, lets do 2v2!!!
Back in the days there were world pvp, city sieges with hundres of players, and AV 40x40.
Now they force us to do 2v2.
I do not find Arena fun. I find objective BG fun.
I could go RBG, but then I need to use hours to find a team. And they probably say my gear is crap.
Then I'm forced to BG anyways where I lose 80% of the time.
If you like BGs = dont play WoW.
If you like clan wars 2v2 go WoW.
Just seems wrong to me.
Tbh I have never found av fun and world pvp sounds pretty boring too. I mean whats the point of doing something that requires barely any skill atall and its all about just nuking the hell out of every1. AV barely has that, mostly its claim the towers, kill the boss. If I want to pvp I want to have 1 v 1 fights, or 2v2 because those are allowing you to win using your skill alone instead of outnumbering the opponent.
AV, SotA, IoC are extremely poorly designed.
There aren't any realm pools anymore and I'm not aware of any EU language that would lose 80% of the time. I'm on the EU servers myself and even after losing a lot at the start of MoP I'm still around 70-75% win ratio for most battlegrounds.
Actually they are not, people just refuse to play them as they were thought to be played completly ignoring objectives and mechanics and then scream and cry when they're losing.
You need two people for 2on2, assuming you are one that means you need ONE, ONE other person for that.
Death grip the tank out of the room on IoC, if he doesn't run in back immediatly he's going to die. If the boss decides to throw daggers at that point, nasty.