Unigine Valley is released.

[Saithes]

My GTX 660 Ti has a 980MHz base core clock, then goes even beyond the 1059MHz Boost Clock that it was rated for hitting upwards of 1.2GHz. This is without even an overclock on it yet or the power percentage being raised in EVGA Precision/Afterburner.

[n0cturnal]

Afterburner said 1070, so it's ~130MHz off from reality. (2*66MHz off to be exact... Seems like it's misreading the multiplier of the core clock.)

Third run was 6 points higher than first one after rebooting, so ~1300 seems to be the normal score for stock speed 660ti.

Well clearly the way they read the clock speed is not working, when I did my 1372MHz run it read something like ~1440MHz.

---------- Post added 2013-02-15 at 01:37 AM ----------

My GTX 660 Ti has a 980MHz base core clock, then goes even beyond the 1059MHz Boost Clock that it was rated for hitting upwards of 1.2GHz. This is without even an overclock on it yet or the power percentage being raised in EVGA Precision/Afterburner.

Yes that is Kepler boost in effect.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1265110/t...#post_17391119

[Shruikah]

Gave it a quick run through, crossfire 7970s at stock.

[Jaynith]

Stock Asus 660ti DC2O-2GD5

[Lathais]

Just so I can get laughed at for my older shitty system, here ya go:


will have to run again later this month after I get my 3570k and OC it a bit.

[Saithes]

Yes that is Kepler boost in effect.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1265110/t...#post_17391119

Yes, I'm aware. I was stating it for vesseblah wondering why it may have been listing 1.2GHz. Thanks for the link though I was actually trying to find that lol

[n0cturnal]

Just so I can get laughed at for my older shitty system, here ya go:

[.IMG]http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd104/Waldo863/Benchmark_zps11d32f09.jpg[/IMG]
will have to run again later this month after I get my 3570k and OC it a bit.

Overclocking the CPU will most likely not do any difference in a benchmark like this. Overclocking the GPU however can make a huge difference.

[DeltrusDisc]

What I was meaning was I don't get off on numbers anymore it's a costly habbit. And my opinion the old test looked better.

From what I can tell... this isn't as high-level graphically as Heaven.

[Deleted]

That's quite a frame rate hitch there, i guess I should run it again without background processes later on.

I suppose it is decent for a PC I bought four years ago, apart from the recent GPU upgrade.

Edit: Posted new score, old one is here.

[n0cturnal]

All the GTX 660TI cards seems to sit pretty at about ~1300 points, you should be pretty happy with your 1176 points Deltrus.

[DeltrusDisc]

/img
That's quite a frame rate hitch there, i guess I should run it again without background processes later on.

I suppose it is decent for a PC I bought four years ago, apart from the recent GPU upgrade.

For a 660 Ti, compared to the other 660 Ti's in this thread - it looks about right.

---------- Post added 2013-02-15 at 01:35 AM ----------

All the GTX 660TI cards seems to sit pretty at about ~1300 points, you should be pretty happy with your 1176 points Deltrus.

I'm honestly rather shocked.

The 660 Ti's should be doing... better.

Granted my max fps was like 49. lol These folks are seeing about 60 fps max.

Also, did you run quality at ultra? I guess I'll run quality at ultra to be sure.

[Shiromar]

I like it, it's a change up from Heaven. Here's my score with i5 2500k @ 4.2 and Gigabyte 7950 @ 1100/1400.

[n0cturnal]

For a 660 Ti, compared to the other 660 Ti's in this thread - it looks about right.

---------- Post added 2013-02-15 at 01:35 AM ----------



I'm honestly rather shocked.

The 660 Ti's should be doing... better.

Granted my max fps was like 49. lol These folks are seeing about 60 fps max.

Also, did you run quality at ultra? I guess I'll run quality at ultra to be sure.

I'm fairly certain it sets it to Ultra when you pick Extreme HD.

[DeltrusDisc]

Yeah I guess I didn't save it to run it at the custom setting I'd thought I made.

Just ran Extreme HD.... and got 1175. lol

Well shit.

[Deleted]

For a 660 Ti, compared to the other 660 Ti's in this thread - it looks about right.

Well, it indeed does, but the min FPS was rather low. I'm struggling when it switches scenes. Anyways, my new run was better.

[Sting]

Hm, that fps low was when it started with the rainy part, otherwise if went fine as far as I could see. Should I be worried that I'll have to upgrade for, let's say, GTA V?

[Shiatan]

Sapphire 7970 oc

[DeltrusDisc]

/img

Hm, that fps low was when it started with the rainy part, otherwise if went fine as far as I could see. Should I be worried that I'll have to upgrade for, let's say, GTA V?

I would never suggest upgrading GPU for a single game, unless you know you're going to play it more than anything else - and a lot.

Your score looks pretty good to me, though I wonder why it is taking into account the Intel HD 3000 graphics as well... You running a Z68 board with your 2500K (or Z77) and running the integrated graphics with your discrete graphics?

[Cyanotical]

[n0cturnal]

[.IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ggUkJGS.png[/IMG]

Dat score!

I would never suggest upgrading GPU for a single game, unless you know you're going to play it more than anything else - and a lot.

Your score looks pretty good to me, though I wonder why it is taking into account the Intel HD 3000 graphics as well... You running a Z68 board with your 2500K (or Z77) and running the integrated graphics with your discrete graphics?

It is the same for me, I guess it is just that the GPU is activated in BIOS on a Z series board or possibly that the drivers are installed as well.