That's... sickening. I'm speechless. Those laws need to change - that's ridiculous! >.<
That's... sickening. I'm speechless. Those laws need to change - that's ridiculous! >.<
Oddly enough people tend to get upset when you try to look on the bright side of a child rape case. This one in particular is pretty bad because he's with CYF meaning other than the therapists they send to him he probably doesn't have any forms of support (no family and after they move him, no friends).
Wow....11...really!?
I felt compelled to chime in on this subject as there seems to be some misunderstanding about these laws.
Rape is in some countries defined as the "penetration of the body without consent" now since rape by woman doesn't usually happen through penetration (unless you are the girl with the dragon tattoo) there is a different law of abuse that protects man from woman and usually the sentence is of equal severity as the male counterpart.
In this case though what is more interesting to me is the ramification for the child's parenthood. See if a woman gets raped she has a choice wether or not she can keep the child (usually and understandably resulting in abortion). Now in this case the choice lies with the woman since it is her body, Yet the child has to live with the results that he is a father willingly or not.
I laughed way too hard at that.
Since the article linked is inaccurate, thus making the OP inaccurate, and the topic really having no where constructive to go, closing.