Originally Posted by
wolfen
I am against Vol'Jin, and have been from the start. There were three reasons why Garrosh was a failure as a warchief: thrall, cairne, and Vol'jin.
Immediately from the get go, of Thrall stepping down and choosing Garrosh over Saurfang or Cairne, he chooses the worst choice, the choice easiest to go to war with the Alliance rather than simply talking and negotiating. So what right does Thrall have to choose the next warchief? None. He was the cause of this damn fiasco to begin with, after him pussyfooting out of the Horde.
Next is Both Vol'Jin and Cairne. Lore states that Thrall tells them to help advise the Garrosh, to help him, as Etrigg alone cannot do it, (shown in the Siege.) Nope, they were disgusted with the choice, just as much as most of the Horde players to begin with, that they abandoned ship before Thrall even stepped down. Cairne going into a Deathmatch with Garrosh, only to be written out for the badly written Garrosh. Vol'Jin telling Garrosh he was already planning to kill him. They did not advice him at all. They are the cause of all this. Being badly written characters, and immediately trying to kill a warchief immediately after his empowerment does not constitute cool points, rather, they are the reason Garrosh turned out this way.
If he had both Vol'Jin and Cairne advising him, we would not have had this "war." But rather, after "defeating" Garrosh, we empower the worst one, who immediately did not give Garrosh a chance. Vol'Jin deserves death for his actions, and only the Honorable deserve to be Warchief, Ie. Nazgrim (though his oath led to his death) and Saurfang, not someone who tried to backstab Garrosh at the very beginning. All three deserve consequences for their actions, Thrall the least, as he did not know his friends would immediately abandon Garrosh, and as much as I hate to say it, Cairne got what he deserved, he should have at least waited a few months, while trying to advice him, before actually going "Thrall make you warchief, I killz you!" Vol'Jin deserves death for his actions as well, but being a major lore character, and the amount of "casualties" the Horde has taken, he is not even going to get a smack on his wrist.
The best candidates for warchief are/were Saurfang, Nazgrim, Lor'themar, Baine, and even Sylvannas over Vol'Jin. Saurfang because he has the knowledge of knowing war, and understands the meaning behind it, and would never ever push for war after everything that has happened to him. Plus, he is wise beyond his years( as old as he is), and even stood behind Garrosh, being an honorable Orc all the way up to point where Garrosh had become a menace to the world. Nazgrim is in a similar situation with Saurfang, being bound by his oath, which in the end killed him, even though he knew his Warchief was wrong. Lor'themar, since the expansion, showed such evolution, leadership, and worry for his people that he simply made the list of being the best Non-orc warchief. Baine, while new to leading the Tauren, has already handled the reigns pretty well, and stood behind Garrosh, but kept a weary eye on him, and abandoned ship when they knew the ship was sinking. Sylvannas over Vol'Jin... You may question me this, but at least she made it known she never liked Garrosh and planned to do everything in her power to keep HER people alive, even using plague when told not to, as she saw Garrosh as incompetent, and unlike Vol'Jin, Thrall did not tell her to advice Garrosh to make him a better leader. She was true to her nature, and that being a complete "bitch" (garrosh's words) towards them. While she would have been the least likely to ever be Warchief, ever, she makes more sense than Vol'Jin, lorewise.
Me, I was hoping for Lor'themar, as they said someone we would not expect, as everyone... Everyone expected Vol'Jin, and they lied to us.