Stay classy MMO-C. "14 year old knows what sex is so it's not rape"
Meanwhile in every thread about male-on-female statutory rape ever: "CUT THAT MAN'S BALLS OFF AND FEED THEM TO HIM, WOMEN SHOULD NOT GO THROUGH THIS KIND OF HORRIBLE STUFF APEHPERAGER7H AWP WERGHWR"
Yes, a 20 year old is not nearly as susceptible to being coerced into something they don't understand. A 20 year old is expected to be able to take responsibility for his decisions.
Desiring to have sex with someone who looks like a child is not really something people choose and generally speaking we don't really have much choice regarding what turns us on. There are hundreds (if not thousands) of weird fetishes out there, and no matter how strange or crazy or even repulsive some of us may find them, unless they result in that individual harming someone else, who are we to judge?
However, going ahead and engaging in the act is a choice. Since having sex with a minor would be a choice that has a massive potential to harm a child it is wrong and people who feel such desires would do well to seek professional help before they end up harming a child.
This whole thing man... still got 8 pages to read through, but I mean what the hell.
Yeah bud... that's how it works.. The article mentions how they did not charge the guy with the violation.. They very well could have though..
How about you stop trying to act like a dick, and instead quote me entirely??
I do it for you...
Ripping one sentence part out of an entire statement...... Great tennis.. Falsify statements much?How can it be called rape, when the applicable state law demands from you the under aged person to not engage into such activity?
Statutory rape makes only sense when the minor is clearly incapable to make any such decision at all.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Depends on your state, the source explains it better than i.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...shauna-prewitt
How did she not get charged with Statutory rape to begin with? In Arizona there's no statute of limitations on either rape or sexual abuse of a minor.
WTF is this I don't even.
/shakeshead
I have a better one:Originally Posted by goblinpaladin
14 yr old girl rapes a 20 yr old man, gets pregnant, and later sues for child support...
Who wins?
Last edited by Eroginous; 2014-09-03 at 10:31 AM.
My Gaming Rig: Intel Core 2 quad q9650|ASUS P5G41-T M|2x4GB Supertalent DDR3 1333Mhz|Samsung 840 Evo 250GB|Fractal Design Integra R2 500w Bronze|ASUS Strix GTX 960 4GB|2x AOC e2770s 27" (one portrait, one landscape)|Bitfeenix Phenom Micro ATX
Don't hate my rig, there's nothing quite like the classics.
Last edited by mmocfd561176b9; 2014-09-03 at 10:32 AM.
The child support issue..... careful..
While it might seem unjust... Those are done for the child. The third person involved in such event.
People, we, tend to always focus on the two people that had sex.. The one that should suffer the least from such circumstances is the third person, the child. Hence why the courts usually rule in favor of them.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
I know you disagree with the law, but at the end of the day it IS the law and you are wrong. Xanjori's recent post explains quite well why a 14 year old can never really have consensual sex with an adult.
- - - Updated - - -
Of course there is a slight difference between statutory rape and actual rape. But newsflash: they are both crimes. He is right.
You show zero sign or will to even acknowledge anything of reason, even when you're presented with the applicable law..
Instead you only try to enforce your own made up mind onto those that discuss with you.. That's not discussion. That's acting like a dick.
The second quote was only a suggestion.. Could as well have said "think about this for a moment"..
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Saying something is good because it's law isn't exactly a good argument. By law I couldn't buy stronger alcoholic drinks at Systembolaget until I was 20 for consumation at home or parties, but I could've driven a car at 18, could buy cigarettes at 18, could go to a bar and get drunk as fuck when I was 18, legally.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm referring to the woman giving birth as opposed to demanding custody of an already existing child.
Also, guys & girls, he could have the CS payments waived completely if he pursues legal action over his allegation of rape, and as a result he could even have her stripped of custody if successful in prosecution.
Which again depends upon state, she could sue for visitation rights or even be prohibited straight off the bat from custody/ visits after conviction.
So far though he hasn't actually pressed charges, only commented on it and how he wants to try and enter the child's life, so in the eyes of the law (So far) he isn't viewed as a (Statutory) rape victim yet.
It's an interesting scenario.