I would never have paid (in any setting/format) to see that movie.
I also did not pirate it.
I am mildly curious but the fact is, for me, even pirating it is 'too inconvenient'. When it comes out on Netflix, maybe I'll catch it then
I would never have paid (in any setting/format) to see that movie.
I also did not pirate it.
I am mildly curious but the fact is, for me, even pirating it is 'too inconvenient'. When it comes out on Netflix, maybe I'll catch it then
I don't have the potential to be a paying costumer. I'm a student struggling with rent and food and shit. I can either not consume content, or consume it. And in both cases, it hurts no one. Actually helps content creator since I can, again, recommend content to others. Morally, there's nothing wrong with what I'm doing. So the law can pretty much go suck a dick here.
To steal is to deprive the rightful owner of. To make a copy of something illegally you have committed copyright infringement. Both are illegal, only one is stealing.
Copyright infringement is not stealing, just because you want to word it as "taking" a copy. You didn't take the copy, because it is still at the source location, in the rightful owners possession.
Oh, and if they don't release it in your location, fuck em, they weren't going to get any money off you anyway if they can't be arsed releasing it where you can buy it, so there's no lost profit there.
The idea that someone who creates something does not deserve credit nor rewards to creating it...is simply going to lead to people ceasing to create and share things.
People that make film don't do it pro-bono. Your childish views on ownership just reinforce that most people just want a free ride.
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutesOr should I?
It's public opinion at work. People download because they are not willing to pay for the movie they downloaded. There are tons of movies I would watch if they were free but would not watch if I had to pay for them. Some movies are worth paying for. Some aren't worth watching at all. That's how it has always been. The ratio if downloads to purchases is only an indicator of how terrible a product is with some inflection for hype. Movie got popular because of news, but is still a terrible movie, so lots of people wanted to see it without paying for it.
I have the internet, I pay for it, it is on said internet, the person distributing it is doing something illegal, not me I am just watching something made available to me through which the medium I pay for makes available. Watching something is not illegal.
Processor:Intel I5 8600 @ 3.5Ghz
Ram:G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) ddr4
GPU: EVGA SC 1070
some other stuff i can't remember eh
Still I cry, tears like pouring rain, Innocent is my lurid pain.
The discussion ITT:Call it what you will, priating is taking a copy of something and not paying for it. Every pirate needs to be aware of this, or grow up.Copying is stealing. No copying is not stealing. No copying is stealing. No it is not. Yes it is. Semantics, semantics, semantics, semantics.
Everyone has to decide for himself if he thinks it's the right thing to do.
I see it as a demo version most of the time. Before I buy something, I'd like to try it. If I like it, I will support the producer in the future. Given I don't really try a lot of things nowadays - and back in the older days demos were a given. Today, not so much anymore.
In case of The Interview - it was an idiotic dick move to make the movie US only with US only credit cards. Too bad for you Sony. The movie wasn't even worth paying for in my eyes.
You're saying you'll gladly pay for a digital item that's available for purchase to >YOU<, but it's not available for purchased to >YOU<, you'll just take it?
So you're saying "I'd like to do things legally, but instead of waiting X months for it to legally be purchased by my fellow countryman I'll illegally obtain it"?