People still bitching about Jurassic World

[yetgdhfgh]

As long as the movie entertains me i dont give a shit if the dinosaurs can talk let alone not looking right

I know they are just jumping on the bandwagon and this just native advertising so iam not sure why to even get upset!

[zorkuus]

The only pet peeve I have with it is the Mosasaur. It's like 5 times the size of a blue whale, that's a big stretch even for a genetically engineered themepark monster.

[Deleted]

The problem is that people see movies, and believe the information in them. This is especially problematic for films with an air of historical accuracy about them like Selma or the Imitation Game.

Yeah but the film goes out of it's way saying THESE DINOSAURS ARE INTENTIONALLY DIFFERENT

- - - Updated - - -

The only pet peeve I have with it is the Mosasaur. It's like 5 times the size of a blue whale, that's a big stretch even for a genetically engineered themepark monster.

No it isn't - you see it's full body and it's more spermwhale lengh

[Puupi]

I uh... I don't even... Why did someone even bother to draw that? ... I mean, you can't even really see anything!

Why? This is why:

[GennGreymane]

they died doing what they loved.......













































pornography

[Eldar45]

They spliced the DNA with that of frogs. It removed the feathers and let them grow penises. Boom.


By the way, the "Velociraptors" of Jurassic Park are Velociraptors, but they are Gregory S Paul's idea of Raptors as he thinks the small raptors of Mongolia and the large raptors in the USA are the same species both of which he calls Velociraptor. Whether they are or not, or had feathers or not is really just a matter of opinion.

My personal opinion is that they are both the same species, with the smaller ones obviously being Juvenilles that have feather like scales that they lose as they grow older.

[Deleted]

They spliced the DNA with that of frogs. It removed the feathers and let them grow penises. Boom.

Frogs have no penis.

[Deleted]

Wow, I always thought they were nearly as tall as people.. Though that silhouette makes it look like a duck with a really long tail.

Spielberg changed the appearance of Velociraptor to a Deinonychus because he felt it was more scary, the only reason he didn't correctly name them is because again he felt Velociraptor sounded more fierce and easier to pronounce. It's where the joke "It looks like an oversized turkey" stems from because Velociraptors essentially are oversized turkeys

[Eldar45]

Frogs have no penis.

It was a joke. They changed from female to male in the movies.

[Deleted]

Agreed, it bugs the shit out of me when these purists come in and complain about that kinda stuff. Same thing with 300. "Oh that's not how the battle happened in real life" Oh really? No shit. I thought Xerxes really had monsters at his command during the battle of thermopylae

While I agree that people should shush about Jurassic Park, because its a movie not a documentary, and while I really wasnt a fan of 300... It's a different thing.

300 is a soldier's story about what happened. It's one of those "unreliable narrator" things. The entire movie is one guy telling the story of a battle that only he is alive to see -he's bigging up what happened to look cool in front of his friends, so it makes sense that it's all bullshit. Jurassic park doesn't have that to hide behind.

[idunnowatdo]

but its just a fantasy movie D: why cant i just accept that thats what it is.

[Kailith]

Great movie, and they even mention why the dinos are different then they actually are thought to have been like. "If we took what they actually were they would have been much different looking. You wanted them bigger, scarier." (Not exact quote but close enough.)

[Deleted]

While I agree that people should shush about Jurassic Park, because its a movie not a documentary, and while I really wasnt a fan of 300... It's a different thing.

300 is a soldier's story about what happened. It's one of those "unreliable narrator" things. The entire movie is one guy telling the story of a battle that only he is alive to see -he's bigging up what happened to look cool in front of his friends, so it makes sense that it's all bullshit. Jurassic park doesn't have that to hide behind.

It doesn't hide behind it, it's a social commentary on genetic engineering, the ethics and corporate greed. The dinosaurs are intentionally designed to look scary for $$$

[Deleted]

Wait what, I thought Dinosaurs looked like:

[Alopex]

Wait what, I thought Dinosaurs looked like:

Are you sure it's not this?

[robomatticus]

The problem is that people see movies, and believe the information in them. This is especially problematic for films with an air of historical accuracy about them like Selma or the Imitation Game.

Selma wasn't very accurate at all.

[Armbre]

Why? This is why:

Thats some hardcore boning *ba dum pssst*

[Reeve]

Better?

[Deleted]

Wish Chris Pratt talent could've been used in better made movies. Guardians and Jurassc World were pretty average and he was the best thing about both of the movies. I wish the new Indiana Jones movie will have proper script and director so Pratt can finally score a good movie. And ofcourse NO MORE FUCKN CGI!

[Deleted]

No those feathered T Rexes still look ridiculous