Follow along,
Much hay is made politically about the need for minority representation in everything. For example, half of congress isn't female and this is seen as a truly appalling fact. Isabel Allende for example is a fairly notable feminist activist whose spoken such things at TED talk conferences. We are told we need these unique perspectives, these unique voices, these unique people because they will have perspective that others don't. My perspective my brothers perspectives are different.
In writing and culture this is effectively the recent calls for more art and media by basically non-white, straight, men ect. These voices we are told will enrich the culture and enrich everything by bringing needed diversity. But is that what is really going on here? I bring to the floor the example of fakes. As an example, recently a white man published a poem under a pin name that was Chinese. The guy whom published it even admitted it was well received because he perceived it as a "Chinese," persons work. Or as a more distant example, a white upper class woman wrote a book about growing up as a Latina in the poorer parts of LA. Well received book, considered a really authentic piece of culture, then it was later found out to be fictional.
It begs a question though, if women right like women, black people write black, ect ect, and that is why we need these topical lens' these diverse perspectives, than why are they so easy to fake? Why can't people, particularly progressive people and activists with strong eyes and hearts for social justice and progressive politics, spot the fake?
Is the pursuit of diverse voices genuine? It seems that people are more looking for a diverse looking image to state pre-agreed upon stereotypes of what people already think. Certainly my Womans Studies Class (That I am made to take for credits) wants a woman president, but probably would not want say Sarah Palin as that woman president.