He did not approach them. When they said something to him, he turned around, and was shot instantly.
Thinking he might approach them is very different from him approaching them.
Therefore, anyone who claimed he approached them isn't a credible witness. You would think a defense lawyer would be able to remind a jury every time such an officer is called to testify, that there is documented evidence of that officer's willingness to lie. Without camera footage, how could that officer justify their actions and arrests, when their testimony is worthless? Seems like it would be a major conflict with their ability to perform their duties.
You basically have no idea what you are talking about. See my previous response. This is cold weather season, a taser is a single shot all or nothing tool that might not even make contact through heavier clothing. Then the officer is fucked per the 21 foot rule because his real gun is holstered while his now useless taser has fizzled out on him.
- - - Updated - - -
Actually most soft body armor is not rated at all for piercing damage. A hard armor type will, but no idea what they had on, if anything in this instances.
Last edited by Crissi; 2015-11-25 at 02:45 AM.
He was moving towards them but yeah he wasn't close enough to use the knife. I can see a case being made that ignoring a officers instructions with a deadly weapon as grounds for lethal force. I don't agree it was warrented in this case at least not at the point it was used but I can understand how the argument could be made.
No he was moving away.
They had their cars and full control the decision how to engage and with what distance was up to them.
They can't irresponsible get themself into dangerous situations and outsource the risk to normal people who
while being suspicious didn't pose an imediate threat.
Not having stab proof vests in stock seems bad too.
Last edited by mmocd79acbf389; 2015-11-25 at 02:46 AM.
Gonna be a different kind of Black Friday in Chiraq this year
Maybe you should try to be a bit less edgy on the internet then. :P
They handled the situation poorly had bad equip and training.
This is not the poor guys fault the person who has to uphold the law has to meet a higher standard.
If 20 foot or whatever is the deadly distance why did they engage within 20 foot?
Why did officer darren let a guy come so close that this person touched his fucking gun?
How irresponsible can you be?
Last edited by mmocd79acbf389; 2015-11-25 at 02:51 AM.