'Cuz, just like with everything else, men are just better than women at it. There are tons of would-be female mass-murderers, of course, but they just weren't good enough at it to rack up a high enough number to be entered into the mass-murderers books. Truly pitiable creatures.
"Quack, quack, Mr. Bond."
Men are biologically more likely to commit crimes.
It's okay for me to say that, right? Because we're not talking about a perceived minority group?
Women usually prefer to manipulate male partners into doing it for them or kill those who are unable to fight back or run (think all the female doctors and carer's that have murdered etc...). There are female mass murderers too, they're just more sneaky and clever about it and usually get more sympathy from people.
Also stop trying to bait people.
its not even that, both sexes have the same level of aggression its the paths that aggression takes that is different.
women are more prone to trapping and poisoning then outright killing someone.
we're all killers born and bred, but we use the means most fitting to our strengths and weaknesses.
Why are most child murderers women?
They're not always male.
-In recent history the San Bernadino killings were a male/female duo.
-Several suicide bombings have been carried out by females in Israel, Turkey, Iraq and Pakistan.
-Google Andrea Yates.
A more correct question might be 'why are mass murders usually males'?
This is actually incorrect. In ME countries females are used as suicide bombers quite frequently.
For starters, what more could they ask for in concealment garments for the explosives?
They are not.
Also, I like the first reply to this thread.
"It's just like I always said! You can do battle with strength, you can do battle with wits, but no weapon can beat a great pair of tits!"
first off, i'm talking about the actual commitment of violence, not the biological drive which yes men have more test thus have more of a biological drive towards it.
but biology is rather rarely what causes the confrontation, isn't it?
no, instead i'm talking about the violence that is actually spilling blood.
which if you look at really any countries crime reports, for example the FBI crime reports for the US, you'll notice that women tend to kill someone they know while men typically kill strangers or only acquaintances.
and if you look at the majority of the means of these murders you'll see knives and poison thrown around more often then in a den of rogues.
now it comes down to a question, which is more aggressive? plotting to kill someone over a period of time or simply shooting someone in the moment?
i tend to think that intent matters, so i go with the former not the latter.
Last edited by Adarian; 2016-07-23 at 05:03 PM.
It's just another thing men do better than women.
Because men and women are not equal.
It's not just mass murderers either, it's most if not all crime btw.