Originally Posted by
Nixx
You give the ability of colleges to shape and control someone's world view too much credit. Attendance at these types of events is totally voluntary in the first place, which right off the bat means they're likely going to serve more of a purpose reinforcing existing views than introducing new ideas to people, since the people most inclined to go listen to someone speak are those already favorable to the things that person represents. Frankly, I never attend them because they're an inefficient use of time. If I am interested in hearing more about the types of things they have to say, I can just as easily research it on my own and acquire the information faster than listening to them speak, not to mention have total freedom to pursue whatever aspect interests me the most. That's a result of my own motivation to seek out dissent and expand my view though, not a product of simply putting talks on campus, and rest assured there are many tools available to broaden one's perspective, of which a speaker is arguably one of the least effective. If someone wants to push the boundaries of their view point, not allowing a speaker to give a talk will do as much damage to their ability to do that as flicking a pebble at a mountain. You can take issue with them not allowing him to talk or capitulating or whatever, but the exposure of college students to new ideas is not at risk here.
I don't care about Shapiro in and of himself and have no interest in him one way or the other.