Originally Posted by
Garnier Fructis
It's not a theory. It's speculation without a basis in any physics or math, it just freely borrows words from both and combines them in ways that make progressively less sense.
For instance, carrying his analogy to time as the 4th dimension, he regards an element of the 4th dimension as a moment in the universe. This is a Newtonian way of looking at the world, where you could separate configurations of space into well defined moments in time. But this isn't possible in Special Relativity, where something can happen before or after something else, depending on choice of reference frame. This means that time itself is part of the description of events and you can't partition the universe into set slices of time anymore. This is basically a fancy way of saying that time doesn't behave like spatial dimensions, physically or mathematically.